Jump to content

The American Media Should Not Be Trusted


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Tibs, with all due respect, what your example shows is just how inaccurate the polling is these days, and has been for the last few election cycles. I cannot blame either the left leaning or right leaning media on this one. They don’t take the time or invest the resources to do much more than read the polls they’re given to read. The problem isn’t the media here.


Not necessarily, voting behavior on a hidden secret ballot or behind a curtain versus polling positions that are said out loud to a person. that matters…

 

point 1 trump always always always himself out performed polling. possible explanation people that couldn’t stand him told everyone they wouldn’t vote for him, but behind the curtain perhaps some element of policy was just enough.

 

point 2, Rs underperformed polls this time.. what was the top issue on the ballot that people might not want to be transparent about?? Abortion! So overtly: economy bad, abortion evil… privately behind a curtain maybe having that escape hatch from an undesirable situation is more influential. 

7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Rush Limbo profited off Conservatives, that makes him a liberal...or something 🙄


Aaaah that’s what you think of as mainstream media. Now the delusion adds up.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


Not necessarily, voting behavior on a hidden secret ballot or behind a curtain versus polling positions that are said out loud to a person. that matters…

 

point 1 trump always always always himself out performed polling. possible explanation people that couldn’t stand him told everyone they wouldn’t vote for him, but behind the curtain perhaps some element of policy was just enough.

 

point 2, Rs underperformed polls this time.. what was the top issue on the ballot that people might not want to be transparent about?? Abortion! So overtly: economy bad, abortion evil… privately behind a curtain maybe having that escape hatch from an undesirable situation is more influential. 


Aaaah that’s what you think of as mainstream media. Now the delusion adds up.

“ Rush Limbo” though, ya gotta give @Tiberius credit for slipping in a humdinger there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the polling for the midterms turned out to be excellent
 

Per The Economist:

Quote

“The Economist has built a statistical model to estimate vote-counts in each race based on the number of outstanding ballots in each county. This model shows Republicans on track to win roughly 50.8% of the total votes cast for either major party in the chamber. If so, pollsters will have come impressively close: our aggregate of so-called generic-ballot polls had the party winning 50.4%.”

 

Quote

The story is much the same elsewhere. Across 19 states that had competitive Senate races this year, polls for presidential and Senate races in 2020 overestimated Democratic candidates’ vote margin by an average of 4.7 points. This year they appear to have undershot the party by 0.9 points on average. 


 

Quote

It will take months for pollsters to probe why they did not suffer so badly this year from the methodological spectres haunting their methods last time. One theory is that Donald Trump’s presence on the ticket heightens turnout among lower-propensity voters who do not answer pollsters’ calls. That caused polls to underestimate Republicans in presidential years but not in midterms.
 

Another possibility is that aggregates were dominated by pollsters who are friendly towards Republicans, biasing our forecasts. Nine of the final ten polls released for the New Hampshire Senate race, for example, came from firms that our algorithms estimate were friendlier towards Republicans than the average pollster. That is a good reminder that, when it comes to election prediction, most prognosticators are at the mercy of the pollsters. This time round, they have done well. 


So if the polling was excellent, but everyone is surprised by the outcome, that does lead credence to the idea that our media sucks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:

Looks like the polling for the midterms turned out to be excellent
 

Per The Economist:

 


 


So if the polling was excellent, but everyone is surprised by the outcome, that does lead credence to the idea that our media sucks. 

No argument from me. Our media definitely sucks. The American people better get used to the fact that they’re not being fed what they used to think of as news reporting. Everything is just an opinion show now. Sad…and terribly exhausting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

China 100% agrees with this thread title! 

 

As reporters were being ushered out of the room, a TV producer called out to ask Biden if he would raise human rights during the talks. A man on the Chinese side yanked the producer backward by her backpack, and she lost her balance but didn’t fall. Two White House staff members then intervened and said the producer should be left alone.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/14/biden-xi-meeting-bali-g20/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

GENTLEMEN, YOU CAN’T COMMIT JOURNALISM HERE — THIS IS A NEWS SHOW! NBC suspends correspondent . . . . . . 

 

after network was forced to retract exclusive report on how Nancy Pelosi’s husband Paul, 82, calmly opened door to cops — and then walked towards ‘hammer intruder’ who bludgeoned him.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11428999/NBC-SUSPENDS-correspondent-network-forced-retract-exclusive-report-Paul-Pelosi-attack.html

 

 

 

Still awaiting the suspensions for the fake "dossier / collusion stories.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

I QUESTION THE TIMING, AS THEY SAY: 

 

Four Developments That Waited Until After the Midterms.

 

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/11/17/five-developments-that-waited-until-after-the-midterms-n1646639

So there is a conspiracy involving all the media companies working together? That's the gist of this post and the entire thread? 

 

Sounds a lot like something the authoritarian governments say about the free press 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

So there is a conspiracy involving all the media companies working together? That's the gist of this post and the entire thread? 

 

Sounds a lot like something the authoritarian governments say about the free press 

Before the last election every liberal news source lied about Bidens son laptop, in 2012 Candy Crowley lied during a debate to benefit Obama,  in 2004 CBS made up a whole story about GWB, so the accusation is not without precedent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

Before the last election every liberal news source lied about Bidens son laptop, in 2012 Candy Crowley lied during a debate to benefit Obama,  in 2004 CBS made up a whole story about GWB, so the accusation is not without precedent. 

So it is a massive left wing conspiracy! We are literally living in a country where the media is like in Soviet Russia, huh? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tiberius said:

 

So there is a conspiracy involving all the media companies working together?

 

That's the gist of this post and the entire thread? 

 

 

 

Nope.

 

Never has been.

 

It shows that you do not read (or understand) the multiple examples that are posted daily.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So it is a massive left wing conspiracy! We are literally living in a country where the media is like in Soviet Russia, huh? 

 

 

When did I mention government control? I literally said the media is known for lying to influence elections and you added in the part that Democrats are Communists, at least you admit who your side is!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Orlando Tim said:

When did I mention government control? I literally said the media is known for lying to influence elections and you added in the part that Democrats are Communists, at least you admit who your side is!

So the major corporations that run the media companies and pro-communism? 

 

Maybe try some of this: 

 

image.png.1b9f860563e14ae2256a80e6cf4ec0f8.png

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So the major corporations that run the media companies and pro-communism? 

 

Maybe try some of this: 

 

image.png.1b9f860563e14ae2256a80e6cf4ec0f8.png

When did I say that the media was communist? You are the only person who compared our media to the Soviet Union. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                             FiL-SBuVIAE3m7P?format=jpg&name=medium

 

 

 

.

It what definition of the word would this numbskull be considered a ‘journalist’? I would think his own network wouldn’t toss that word around so easily. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

It what definition of the word would this numbskull be considered a ‘journalist’? I would think his own network wouldn’t toss that word around so easily. 

 

Because in our new clown world where words are redefined at random, journalist means political activist for leftist causes, and half the nation is perfectly fine with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...