The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection

[BillsFanNC]

16 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Here’s What The Jan. 6 Show Trials Are Really After

BY: MARGOT CLEVELAND    JULY 01, 2022

 

 

The Jan. 6 Committee’s Stalinist show trial serves many purposes, but truth is not one of them. On Wednesday, the House committee holding hearings on the violence that broke out at the capitol on Jan. 6, 2020, issued a subpoena to former White House counsel Pat Cipollone. Cipollone, who had voluntarily participated in a closed-door interview in April, “decline[d] to cooperate” further with the committee, according to the letter subpoenaing him to testify before the committee on July 6.

 

It is unclear whether Cipollone will comply with the subpoena, but from the committee’s perspective, it doesn’t matter. The Democrat-stacked committee seeks to score political points, not secure the truth, and subpoenaing Trump’s former White House counsel serves that objective: If Cipollone refuses to testify, his assertion of executive privilege provides the committee a fresh opportunity to condemn Donald Trump while the committee provides the public its own version of the events the former White House counsel supposedly observed.

 

Scoring partisan points is not the only goal of the Jan. 6 Committee. Rather, the carefully massaged hearings seek, at minimum, three broader political objectives.

 

Propagandize Americans About Election Integrity

 

Silencing Complaints About Election Irregularities

 

Safeguard the Swamp

 

Much more at the link;  https://thefederalist.com/2022/07/01/heres-what-the-jan-6-show-trials-are-really-after/

 

 

 

 

 

Great read.  Linked inside that piece is an article from a few weeks ago.  It completely dismantles the BS that the J6 committee is trying to shovel on us.

 

But remember it's all been debunked as crazy Kraken conspiracy theories!!

 

https://thefederalist.com/2022/06/17/jan-6-committee-ignores-clear-evidence-of-mass-illegal-voting-systematically-broken-election-laws/

 

Georgia provides a peach of an example. President Biden won Georgia and the state’s 16 electoral votes by a margin of 11,779 individual votes, but before the state certified the results of the November 2020 election, Trump challenged the outcome, raising several issues both in and out of court. Trump hammered accusations of fraud in Fulton County, claiming counterfeit ballots secreted in suitcases and vote-flipping by Dominion Voting Systems gave Biden the victory. But Trump also contested the Georgia results based on evidence indicating that tens of thousands of illegal votes were improperly counted.

 

.....

 

Trump’s legal team argued illegal votes in some 30-plus categories were improperly included in the final election tally, violations of Section 21-2-218 of the Georgia election code alone closed the gap between the two presidential candidates. That section provides that state “residents must vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election” and “outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, ‘their vote in that county would be illegal.’”

 

...

 

After excluding individuals who moved within 30 days of the general election, Davis “identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.”

 

(Then a bunch of shenanigans by Georgia state officials that amount to essentially running out the clock on Trump's legal challenges so the data is never reviewed let alone brought to court.)

 

“We never were able to present our evidence to the court, however, because the chief judge of Fulton County, Chris Brasher, failed to appoint a judge eligible to hear the election contest for a month,” Mitchell said.

 

None of those 30-plus categories involved the Dominion Voting System, claims of counterfeit votes, or ballot harvesting, but concerned specific violations of the Georgia election code. And those numbers far exceeded Biden’s 11,779-vote margin of victory.

 

Yet the January 6 Committee and their cohorts in the press cast all the challenges to the November 2020 tabulations as crazy conspiracy theories of fraud peddled by Trump to steal the election.

 

 

 

[BillStime]

5 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Great read.  Linked inside that piece is an article from a few weeks ago.  It completely dismantles the BS that the J6 committee is trying to shovel on us.

 

But remember it's all been debunked as crazy Kraken conspiracy theories!!

 

https://thefederalist.com/2022/06/17/jan-6-committee-ignores-clear-evidence-of-mass-illegal-voting-systematically-broken-election-laws/

 

Georgia provides a peach of an example. President Biden won Georgia and the state’s 16 electoral votes by a margin of 11,779 individual votes, but before the state certified the results of the November 2020 election, Trump challenged the outcome, raising several issues both in and out of court. Trump hammered accusations of fraud in Fulton County, claiming counterfeit ballots secreted in suitcases and vote-flipping by Dominion Voting Systems gave Biden the victory. But Trump also contested the Georgia results based on evidence indicating that tens of thousands of illegal votes were improperly counted.

 

.....

 

Trump’s legal team argued illegal votes in some 30-plus categories were improperly included in the final election tally, violations of Section 21-2-218 of the Georgia election code alone closed the gap between the two presidential candidates. That section provides that state “residents must vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election” and “outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, ‘their vote in that county would be illegal.’”

 

...

 

After excluding individuals who moved within 30 days of the general election, Davis “identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.”

 

(Then a bunch of shenanigans by Georgia state officials that amount to essentially running out the clock on Trump's legal challenges so the data is never reviewed let alone brought to court.)

 

“We never were able to present our evidence to the court, however, because the chief judge of Fulton County, Chris Brasher, failed to appoint a judge eligible to hear the election contest for a month,” Mitchell said.

 

None of those 30-plus categories involved the Dominion Voting System, claims of counterfeit votes, or ballot harvesting, but concerned specific violations of the Georgia election code. And those numbers far exceeded Biden’s 11,779-vote margin of victory.

 

Yet the January 6 Committee and their cohorts in the press cast all the challenges to the November 2020 tabulations as crazy conspiracy theories of fraud peddled by Trump to steal the election.

 

 

 

What were the outcomes of the multiple lawsuits filed against Georgia by the Trump campaign?

 

[Tiberius]

So what was the deal with that "War Room" at Willards? That's where the connection between the WH and terrorists can be connected 

 

I mean even you Trump supporters have to see that as b pretty bad, if the president was using right wing terrorists, right? 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

Liz Cheney’s J6 Committee Show Trial Theatrics Are Further Exposed After ‘Concerning Messages’ Source Is Revealed.

 

https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/07/liz-cheneys-j6-committee-show-trial-theatrics-are-further-exposed-after-concerning-messages-source-is-revealed/

 

 

 

[Doc]

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

Liz Cheney’s J6 Committee Show Trial Theatrics Are Further Exposed After ‘Concerning Messages’ Source Is Revealed.

 

https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/07/liz-cheneys-j6-committee-show-trial-theatrics-are-further-exposed-after-concerning-messages-source-is-revealed/

When the House flips, I hope they charge her with perjury.  There need to be consequences. 

[Tiberius]

50 minutes ago, Doc said:

When the House flips, I hope they charge her with perjury.  There need to be consequences. 

You don't care that Trump tried to seize power illegally, do you? 

[SoCal Deek]

24 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You don't care that Trump tried to seize power illegally, do you? 

So knowingly committing a crime to stop an alleged crime is OK? Wonderful…at least we know the rules now. 

[Doc]

49 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You don't care that Trump tried to seize power illegally, do you? 

He did nothing different than his predecessors did. Most people realize that and that’s why nobody gives a crap about the J6 farce. 

[Tiberius]

9 minutes ago, Doc said:

He did nothing different than his predecessors did. Most people realize that and that’s why nobody gives a crap about the J6 farce. 

So that's a "no." He can be king for all you care 

[B-Man]

Cassidy Hutchinson's True Feelings About the January 6th Committee Revealed

 

Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony before the January 6th committee continues to take body blows after multiple statements she made were contradicted by eyewitnesses.

 

The most outrageous claim involved a supposed fight between Donald Trump and two Secret Service agents, culminating in the president grabbing the steering wheel of “The Beast” in an attempt to get to the Capitol.

 

But while that story would have been amazing if it were true, and it spawned many choice memes, the two agents involved have disputed the account.

 

Of course, the committee has shown no urgency in allowing contradictory testimony that pushed back on “the narrative.”

 

Regardless, while Hutchinson and her defenders have presented her as some kind of virtuous truth-teller, leaked text messages tell a different story.

 

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/07/03/leaked-cassidy-hutchinsons-true-feelings-about-the-january-6th-committee-revealed-n588275

 

 

 

 

 

 

[BillStime]

5 hours ago, Doc said:

He did nothing different than his predecessors did. Most people realize that and that’s why nobody gives a crap about the J6 farce. 

Yet half of America thinks Trump should be charged w a crime.

 

Whatever makes you sleep better 

[BillStime]

 

[BillStime]

They all are - just look at the our resident cult members - lolz

 

 

[BillStime]

On 6/28/2022 at 7:16 PM, The Frankish Reich said:

Exactly. There was one target on Jan 6, and one target only: Mike Pence. Trump was following the John Eastman script where Pence would refuse to certify the electoral slate from certain states. Pence wasn't going to do it, unless .... unless he legitimately feared for his life or safety, both on Jan 6 and later. It was a desperation move, but that was the plan.

Oh, there was another plan too: shut down the counting of the votes and the certification of the election by storming the Capitol. That might just delay things long enough for Pence to accept an offer he couldn't refuse.

And yes, the senile and moronic (sometimes both at the same time!) advisors actually thought this could work.

🎯

 

Why wouldn’t Pence leave w his own Secret Service that day?

 

 

[BillStime]

 

[B-Man]

 

 

Last 5 posts to the thread.

 

 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options   

Posted 13 hours ago

 

 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

Posted 11 hours ago

 

 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

Posted 2 hours ago

 

 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

Posted 1 hour ago

 

 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

Posted 59 minutes ago

 

 

 

The panic at the "committee's" failure is obvious.

 

 

 

.

 

 

Edited July 4, 2022 by B-Man

[ChiGoose]

18 hours ago, Doc said:

He did nothing different than his predecessors did. Most people realize that and that’s why nobody gives a crap about the J6 farce. 

I do not seem to recall George W. Bush conspiring with a small group of aides to take actions they knew were illegal in order to delay or prevent the certification of the election. 
 

In fact, contrary to your statement, I have a hard time recalling any president who wanted to prevent the certification of the election, was told that doing so was illegal, and still pushed his people to try to make it happen. 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

 

 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[dickleyjones]

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But he got better!

[ALF]

'I hope you naturally die': Republican posts threats made against him

Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) posted a series of voicemail threats made against him and his family in response to his work as part of the January 6 committee. Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT) explains why this has him worried about the future of democracy.

 

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2022/07/05/adam-kinzinger-voicemails-jim-himes-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/
 

[BillStime]

 

[Nineforty]

On 7/4/2022 at 9:46 AM, B-Man said:

 

 

Last 5 posts to the thread.

 

 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options   

Posted 13 hours ago

 

 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

Posted 11 hours ago

 

 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

Posted 2 hours ago

 

 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

Posted 1 hour ago

 

 

You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options 

Posted 59 minutes ago

 

 

 

The panic at the "committee's" failure is obvious.

 

 

 

.

 

 

Mick Mulvaney

• former Chief of Staff under former President Donald Trump

Quote

 

"The significance of last week’s Congressional Jan. 6 committee hearings cannot be overstated.

For the first time, evidence was presented that former President Trump knew some of the protesters were armed before encouraging them to go the Capitol, that right-wing extremist rioters communicated directly with the White House, that key Presidential advisers requested pardons, that the chief White House lawyer was concerned about getting “charged with every crime imaginable,” and that someone within Trump world may be trying to tamper with committee witnesses.

Serious stuff. But roughly half the country — the Republican half — isn’t watching..."

 

 

 

source: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mick-mulvaney-on-jan-6-hearings-when-republicans-testify-against-other-republicans-republicans-should-pay-attention/ar-AAZgDpT?ocid=EMMX&cvid=453678d8ed924264948beb4cc39a9430

Edited July 6, 2022 by Nineforty

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Doc]

And was it really real?  Nope.

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

On 7/4/2022 at 9:49 AM, ChiGoose said:

I do not seem to recall George W. Bush conspiring with a small group of aides to take actions they knew were illegal in order to delay or prevent the certification of the election. 
 

In fact, contrary to your statement, I have a hard time recalling any president who wanted to prevent the certification of the election, was told that doing so was illegal, and still pushed his people to try to make it happen. 

You must have a short memory.  
 

Wasn’t W Bush the President accused of manufacturing evidence of WMDS to propel the country into a needless war, where young men and women died needlessly in pursuit of profit from oil?  
 

It’s hard to remember because not long after the D leadership accused him and a small group of aides of doing just that, and the election decided, we got these images of him not being investigated by a bi-partisan committee looking to flush out the facts.  
 

It’s weird how all this works. 

 

 

[ChiGoose]

30 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

You must have a short memory.  
 

Wasn’t W Bush the President accused of manufacturing evidence of WMDS to propel the country into a needless war, where young men and women died needlessly in pursuit of profit from oil?  
 

It’s hard to remember because not long after the D leadership accused him and a small group of aides of doing just that, and the election decided, we got these images of him not being investigated by a bi-partisan committee looking to flush out the facts.  
 

It’s weird how all this works. 

 

 

 

Are you equating the actions taken by a president in the duties of their office (even if they are controversial) that they believe may help them get re-elected with the president acting against the advice of his lawyers to try to change the outcome of an election after it had been conducted?

 

Because those are totally different things.

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

24 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

Are you equating the actions taken by a president in the duties of their office (even if they are controversial) that they believe may help them get re-elected with the president acting against the advice of his lawyers to try to change the outcome of an election after it had been conducted?

 

Because those are totally different things.

Oh no, sir, I’m not talking about something controversial. I think we would all agree that energy policy, for example, can be controversial depending on who is offering the analysis. 
 

I’m talking specifically about a politician you mentioned by name, and your inability to recall allegations of “conspiring with a small group of aides”, in this case with respect to creating a false narrative of WMDs that lead to a war and the deaths of thousands of Americans and between 150,000-1,000,000 + Iraqis and others.  
 

Though, in fairness, the allegations related to “war for oil” had nothing to do with contesting an election.  For that type of allegation, you have to go back to Gore contesting his election loss in 2000 and allegations of disenfranchised voters and serious  irregularities in the process. 

I’m surprised you’d take issue with this sort of thing, but maybe you’re a Bush man. 

 

[BillStime]

Idiots

 

 

 

lolz

[SoCal Deek]

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

Idiots

 

 

 

lolz

Wait…what? You were under the impression that the people were gathering to offer their support of Biden? Okie Dokie 

[BillStime]

4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Wait…what? You were under the impression that the people were gathering to offer their support of Biden? Okie Dokie 

Um what?

[SoCal Deek]

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

Um what?

Exactly! 

[Tiberius]

Really? Are they sure they want to put this loon in front of an open mic? 

 

 

[ChiGoose]

31 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Really? Are they sure they want to put this loon in front of an open mic? 

 

 

 

This is like the Mo Brooks offer. It's an offer they know that no committee would accept and they expect it to get rejected. Then they can claim bias or whatever. I wouldn't be surprised if he ends up fundraising  off of it.

[Doc]

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Really? Are they sure they want to put this loon in front of an open mic? 

 

 

 

Why not?  I'm sure they've got Trump now...

[Orlando Tim]

11 hours ago, BillStime said:

Idiots

 

 

 

lolz

We have new video from January 6th 2021? Wow that is amazing that it only took like 18 months to put in the special effects and edits.

[BillStime]

13 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

We have new video from January 6th 2021? Wow that is amazing that it only took like 18 months to put in the special effects and edits.

Oh is THaT what they are doing?

 

smfh

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

This should be the standard for anyone appearing before a Kangaroo Court

 

 

Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes AGREES to Testify Before Liz Cheney and Jan. 6 Committee Next Week

— BUT ONLY IF IT IS AIRED LIVE

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/breaking-exclusive-oath-keepers-founder-stewart-rhodes-agrees-testify-liz-cheney-jan-6-committee-next-week-aired-live/

[Orlando Tim]

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

Oh is THaT what they are doing?

 

smfh

 

 

That is the most logical explanation according to Occam's Razor, do you have a better explanation on how they just "found" this footage 18 months after recording it? 

[Doc]

13 minutes ago, B-Man said:

This should be the standard for anyone appearing before a Kangaroo Court

 

 

Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes AGREES to Testify Before Liz Cheney and Jan. 6 Committee Next Week

— BUT ONLY IF IT IS AIRED LIVE

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/breaking-exclusive-oath-keepers-founder-stewart-rhodes-agrees-testify-liz-cheney-jan-6-committee-next-week-aired-live/

 

So IOW...he won't be called to testify.