Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, DRsGhost said:

 

How about from The Paper Of Record?

 

 


Did not realize that the New York Times was a member of the committee.

 

I know you’re dumb as rocks and have reading comprehension issues, but people analyzing what impact the committee may or may not have on the midterms is not the same as the committee being established with the purpose of helping the Dems in the midterms.

 

Nuance is hard, but maybe take some time to clean the drool off your keyboard and think things through. 

Edited by ChiGoose
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ChiGoose said:


If you think the purpose of the committee is for ratings or to move the needles on the midterms, then you have no idea what you’re talking about.

 

Then again, I’m not sure what I would expect from such illustrious outlets as… Donsurbur.blogspot and  tvline…?

 

Did you say this? Calling out a source?

 

 

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


Did not realize that the New York Times was a member of the committee.

 

I know you’re dumb as rocks and have reading comprehension issues, but people analyzing what impact the committee may or may not have on the midterms is not the same as the committee being established with the purpose of helping the Dems in the midterms.

 

Nuance is hard, but maybe take some time to clean the drool off your keyboard and think things through. 

 

I present a different "trusted" source that says the exact same thing that you claimed only people who have no idea what they're talking about believe because they read your unapproved sources....

 

Yep, you're a clown.

 

The only institution less trusted than media? Friggin congress.  And that's where you place your trust?  :lol:

 

You're a blathering world salad spewing ideologue moron.

 

Absolutely worse than @BillStime and @Tiberius.

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Did you say this? Calling out a source?

 

 

 

I present a different "trusted" source that says the exact same thing that you claimed only people who have no idea what they're talking about believe because they read your unapproved sources....

 

Yep, you're a clown.

 

The only institution less trusted than media? Friggin congress.  And that's where you place your trust?  :lol:

 

You're a blathering world salad spewing ideologue moron.

 

Absolutely worse than @BillStime and @Tiberius.

 

 

 


LOL. You truly cannot read, can you?

 

I said the committee was not created for the purpose of helping the Dems in the midterms. I also said that people may try to analyze what impact it may or may not have on the midterms, but that was not why it was created. 
 

Then you bring analysis about what impact it may or may not have and then hold that up as evidence of the purpose of the committee.

 

At this point, I’m not even sure if you could pass the Turing Test. Your posts are no different than if someone created a bot to scrape Breitbart comments and try to reproduce them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

LOL. You truly cannot read, can you?

 

I said the committee was not created for the purpose of helping the Dems in the midterms. I also said that people may try to analyze what impact it may or may not have on the midterms, but that was not why it was created. 
 

Then you bring analysis about what impact it may or may not have and then hold that up as evidence of the purpose of the committee.

 

At this point, I’m not even sure if you could pass the Turing Test. Your posts are no different than if someone created a bot to scrape Breitbart comments and try to reproduce them. 

 

You would be wrong.  Why do you think they waited until this time to hold them, and then bring them back in another 2 months, close to the election (while trying to tie every Republican to Trump).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


LOL. You truly cannot read, can you?

 

I said the committee was not created for the purpose of helping the Dems in the midterms. I also said that people may try to analyze what impact it may or may not have on the midterms, but that was not why it was created. 
 

Then you bring analysis about what impact it may or may not have and then hold that up as evidence of the purpose of the committee.

 

At this point, I’m not even sure if you could pass the Turing Test. Your posts are no different than if someone created a bot to scrape Breitbart comments and try to reproduce them. 

 

Stupid absolutely should hurt.

 

I know what YOUR ridiculous take on the purpose the committee is. You believe it's purpose is impartial to arrive at the truth about J6.  That take alone qualifies you as a mouth breathing moron.

 

What YOU said is that if OTHERS think the purpose of the committee has anything to do with impacting the midterms then they have no idea what they're talking about.  YOU said this and then you attacked the posters source to bolster your argument. 

 

The tweet I presented wasn't to prove the purpose of the committee.  It was to show that "trusted" left wing sources have said THE EXACT SAME THING as the sources you attacked... you friggin cretin.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by DRsGhost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Stupid absolutely should hurt.

 

I know what YOUR ridiculous take on the purpose the committee is. You believe it's purpose is impartial to arrive at the truth about J6.  That take alone qualifies you as a mouth breathing moron.

 

What YOU said is that if OTHERS think the purpose of the committee has anything to do with impacting the midterms then they have no idea what they're talking about.  YOU said this and then you attacked the posters source to bolster your argument. 

 

The tweet I presented wasn't to prove the purpose of the committee.  It was to show that "trusted" left wing sources have said THE EXACT SAME THING as the sources you attacked... you friggin cretin.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Where in the NYT article you posted does it say the purpose of the committee is to affect the midterms?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

You would be wrong.  Why do you think they waited until this time to hold them, and then bring them back in another 2 months, close to the election (while trying to tie every Republican to Trump).

Dude, we have elections all the time. You can't hearings or trials or anything that are not close to some election time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


Where in the NYT article you posted does it say the purpose of the committee is to affect the midterms?

 

:lol:

 

Maybe ask someone nearby to read it to you if you're having trouble.

 

The purpose of the committee is what the members of the committee tell us that it is, right?  Or maybe the only valid take on the purpose of the committee is what you tell us that it is?

 

That oceanfront property in Iowa is still available at a great price btw.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

:lol:

 

Maybe ask someone nearby to read it to you if you're having trouble.

 

The purpose of the committee is what the members of the committee tell us that it is, right?  Or maybe the only valid take on the purpose of the committee is what you tell us that it is?

 

That oceanfront property in Iowa is still available at a great price btw.

 

 


Got it. It doesn’t say what you said it does so now you need to dodge and hope nobody notices. Well done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Dude, we have elections all the time. You can't hearings or trials or anything that are not close to some election time 

 

They easily could have held them towards the end of last year.  Or the beginning of this year.

Edited by Doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


Got it. It doesn’t say what you said it does so now you need to dodge and hope nobody notices. Well done!

 

Uh huh.

 

Because giving  "Democrats a chance to recast midterm message" has absolutely zero to do with trying to impact mid term election results.

 

Dude, just take the L.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ChiGoose said:


If you think the purpose of the committee is for ratings or to move the needles on the midterms, then you have no idea what you’re talking about.

 

Then again, I’m not sure what I would expect from such illustrious outlets as… Donsurbur.blogspot and tvline…?

I am curious what you think is the purpose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

I am curious what you think is the purpose?


To investigate the attempt to overturn the 2020 election. What happened? Who was involved? What changes can we make to prevent a future attempt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ChiGoose said:


To investigate the attempt to overturn the 2020 election. What happened? Who was involved? What changes can we make to prevent a future attempt?

So it is to cover things we already know? We know who was involved, we know what happened, and we know how to prevent it. Next time we have a publicly announced rally with people on TV stating they want to invade the capitol we actually have more police present than usual. The fact that the FBI and capitol Hill police are not the focus of the committee proves they are not doing what you claim. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

So it is to cover things we already know? We know who was involved, we know what happened, and we know how to prevent it. Next time we have a publicly announced rally with people on TV stating they want to invade the capitol we actually have more police present than usual. The fact that the FBI and capitol Hill police are not the focus of the committee proves they are not doing what you claim. 


We know everybody involved in the fake electors scheme? We know everyone in on the Eastman plan and their roles?

 

There was more to this than the riot. There was a plan in motion and the rioters were not the only aspect of it. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

So it is to cover things we already know? We know who was involved, we know what happened, and we know how to prevent it. Next time we have a publicly announced rally with people on TV stating they want to invade the capitol we actually have more police present than usual. The fact that the FBI and capitol Hill police are not the focus of the committee proves they are not doing what you claim. 

 

Exactly. 

 

Kash Patels testimony would be interesting to hear given he was the DoD point person trying to get congressional leadership or Mayor Bowser to sign off on Trumps National Guard request. The National Guard not being present seems like a major failure that allowed events of J6 to spiral out of control. Yet the committee seems uninterested in probing that aspect....

 

Why I wonder if they are interested in leaving no stone unturned in determining why it happened and preventing it from happening again?

 

 

 

Edited by DRsGhost
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Exactly. 

 

Kash Patels testimony would be interesting to hear given he was the DoD point person trying to get congressional leadership or Mayor Bowser to sign off on Trumps National Guard request. The National Guard not being present seems like a major failure that allowed events of J6 to spiral out of control. Yet the committee seems uninterested in probing that aspect....

 

Why I wonder if they are interested in leaving no stone unturned in determining why it happened and preventing it from happening again?

 

 

 

 

Let's examine a few passages...

 

By their own admission, Democrats set up the hearings to evade such scrutiny. They declared any questions about what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi knew about the potential for Jan. 6 violence and when she knew it were off limits.

 

What you say? Why would asking Pelosi and her staff questions about J6 be off limits in any universe that wants the whole story?

 

A Capitol Police timeline obtained by Just the News shows the Trump Pentagon first offered National Guard troops to the Capitol Police on Jan. 2, 2021, four full days before the event. The police turned down the offer but then began to have second thoughts. The Capitol Police then asked their political minders — the House sergeant at arms chief among them — for permission to accept the troops on Jan. 4 but were turned down on the ground that such a show of force would create bad "optics," the records show.

 

Since when have the dems ever needed to worry about optics with a friendly media? 

 

Even still the optics angle is ludicrous since had the National Guard been deployed on J6 and the right bellyached over it, they could have just released the documents showing that the NG request was initiated by the friggin White House. 

 

The very same documents that the committee refuses to show now in their hearings.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Did you say this? Calling out a source?

 

 

 

I present a different "trusted" source that says the exact same thing that you claimed only people who have no idea what they're talking about believe because they read your unapproved sources....

 

Yep, you're a clown.

 

The only institution less trusted than media? Friggin congress.  And that's where you place your trust?  :lol:

 

You're a blathering world salad spewing ideologue moron.

 

Absolutely worse than @BillStime and @Tiberius.

 

 

 


Trusted sources? 

 

Like judicial watch?

 

@galacticredpill?

 

lmao

 

idiots 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Democrats Really Suck At This Stuff

 

 

That headline could refer to so many things, nearly everything, as a matter of fact. Just about the only thing Democrats do well is lie with a straight face, and that’s accounting for the curve being ruined by Nancy Pelosi’s inability to move most of her face thanks to Botox. But no lie they’ve told comes close to the ones they’re casually tossing around regarding January 6th. Their sham hearings have taken me from someone disgusted by the events of that day to being more disgusted by the way these leftists are exploiting and lying about it.

 

Watching the events of that day, I was sickened. I love the Capitol building, for having crawled through every inch of it when I worked there, for its beauty and for what it represents. Watching jackasses trash it was awful. Watching these committee jackasses trash everything that building stands for is worse.

 

It was bad enough when, in desperation to get people to care, Democrats started calling January 6th the worst thing to happen to the country since the Civil War. Having lived through 9/11 and learned about Pearl Harbor, WWII, the Kennedy Assassination, the Carter administration, we all

knew that was BS. 

 

That realization didn’t deter Democrats. 

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2022/07/24/democrats-really-suck-at-this-stuff-n2610711

 

 

  • Agree 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/20/2021 at 2:47 PM, B-Man said:

Trump: In retrospect, he'd ensure that National Guard troops were deployed on January 6

 

 

Former President Donald Trump said Saturday that if he could do it over again, he would do more to ensure that National Guard troops were deployed on Jan. 6 to prevent the storming of the U.S. Capitol.

 

In a public question-and-answer session with former Fox News personality Bill O’Reilly, Trump said he had recommended a day before the riot that 10,000 troops be deployed at the Capitol, but it didn’t happen.

 

“I would have insisted they had proper protection,”

 

https://hotair.com/karen-townsend/2021/12/19/trump-in-retrospect-hed-ensure-that-national-guard-troops-were-deployed-on-january-6-n436551

 

 


@B-Man filled with hot air as usual

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/23/2022 at 9:58 AM, DRsGhost said:

 

When you absolutely know beyond any doubt that a leftist moron has nothing. 

 

 

 

 

 

What's your argument? Your source is completely biased trash.

On 7/23/2022 at 9:10 AM, Westside said:

I’m on my own time. One of the benefits of retiring young👍🏻

 

Well, young is relative, isn't it?

 

Honestly, if I stopped working I'd probably die of boredom. Hang out on message boards all day...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that this bullSchiff is called a hearing and there is NO cross examination means this Jan 6th crap is nothing but a sham to TRY and make sure that Trump doesn’t run in 2024.

 

What a waste of time and complete hogwash.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, njbuff said:

The fact that this bullSchiff is called a hearing and there is NO cross examination means this Jan 6th crap is nothing but a sham to TRY and make sure that Trump doesn’t run in 2024.

 

What a waste of time and complete hogwash.

You mean it’s nothing more than a publicly funded smear campaign intended to bloody up the DNCs opponent prior to the next election? No! Say it’s isn’t so. 😉

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, njbuff said:

The fact that this bullSchiff is called a hearing and there is NO cross examination means this Jan 6th crap is nothing but a sham to TRY and make sure that Trump doesn’t run in 2024.

 

What a waste of time and complete hogwash.

 

Another idiot biching about the select committee without acknowledging the FACT that their own party voted AGAINST an independent commission. 

 

Cry harder.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Another idiot biching about the select committee without acknowledging the FACT that their own party voted AGAINST an independent commission. 

 

Cry harder.

 


Says the biggest m0r0n on this message board.

 

I got news for. People in this country don’t give a flying flip about Jan 6th.

 

Jan 6th isn’t going to buy food, pay mortgage/rent, buy gas or pay other bills.

 

Trump being in jail or not isn’t going to change one person’s life, so get off your high horse and live your life instead of obsessing about someone who isn’t even in office.

 

Does this Jan 6th thing affect your life in any way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...