Jump to content

Defenses led Brady to his last two rings


NewEra

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Big Turk said:

 

As much as people talk about how great a receiving TE Gronk is, they often overlook just how amazing he is as a run blocker as well...Gronk was sealing the edge against DE's routinely on those outside runs and that is a HUGE benefit to an offense when you have a TE that can not only hold their own in those run blocking matchups, but actually WIN versus a DE.  Usually a TE trying to block a DE is laughable and the TE gets destroyed.  Knox got blown up a few times trying to do that for losses against KC and it happened a lot during the season as well. Gronk won most of those matchups yesterday, and that is very very hard to find.  

 

Gronk might be the most complete TE to ever play the game.  He has no weakness.  He is exceptional at everything.


Turk, we are having the same brain here.  I listened early morning the wrap up last night and the MTC guys on NFLR stated one of Gronks nice add, is exactly what you said.  This also then allows Brate who is awesome to be the pass catching guy, and then after Gronk takes the initial add block, he can step forward and be the release for Brady in short yardage and he gets a ton of YAC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, machine gun kelly said:

I agree.  It’s hard to say last night that the Bucs didn’t have a solid running game, good O Line, and excellent TE’s.  The pats, yes, but that’s a reason why Brady is here (sorry I’m in Tampa).  Here he came into a very good O Line, Evans, Godwin, AB, Miller, Brate, and Gronk.  Let that talent and of course Brady is going to be good.  BB let that part of the game go, and Brady said enough.  The Bucs were the #1 rushing defense, and improved consecutively throughout the year in the secondary.  Those guys are young and they improved tremendously throughout the year.

 

 

Brady never had that much talent on Offense at one time with NE.  Still won 6 rings though.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Ray Stonada said:

It's hard to overestimate the impact he had on them as a leader though. Getting them to realize they can win it it all and staying focused enough to do it, not getting complacent after each achievement including the huge upset in the NFC championship.

 

This wasn't the Giants squeaking by the Pats twice.

 

Defense AND excellently opportunistic offense won this game, in a blowout.

 

 

This post is for anyone who doesn't understand why Tom Brady is Superbowl MVP.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ray Stonada said:

It's hard to overestimate the impact he had on them as a leader though. Getting them to realize they can win it it all and staying focused enough to do it, not getting complacent after each achievement including the huge upset in the NFC championship.

 

This wasn't the Giants squeaking by the Pats twice.

 

Defense AND excellently opportunistic offense won this game, in a blowout.

 

 

 

 

Huge upset?

 

They were only +160/+3.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Buffalo Ballin said:

Great defense wins championships. Always.

 

Even Trent Dilfer and Jim McMahon got rings and they're not all time great QBs.

The niners defense was much better than KCs last year.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Buffalo Ballin said:

Great defense wins championships. Always.

 

Even Trent Dilfer and Jim McMahon got rings and they're not all time great QBs.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle IMO. Special teams can also play a vital role in a football teams victory IMO. So you have 3 aspects of the game to consider IMO. Generally speaking to make the playoffs I think most teams are at the very least above average in at least two out of the 3. Sufficient in the 3rd. Most of the advancing teams in the playoffs are going to be good in all 3 phases of the game and to continue advancing probably going to be great on one side of the football IMO. Or very good in all 3 and well balanced between all 3 in coordination with each other IMO.

 

So to me the world champs can come in differrent forms IMO. I think when you have a upper echelon defensive guru on one side of the football. A franchise QB and good OC on the other anythings possible. If you have the GOAT on one side of the football. Upper echelon defensive guru on the other, well, Tom Brady and 7 Championships... 

 

Regardless of who you may have wanted to win the Superbowl. I hope everyone who enjoys football realizes the history in the making we are all witnessing in real time. I think the game of football this season gave us all a little break from reality when we really needed it most in my humble opinion.

 

Thank you NFL, way to finish the show...

 

Well done...

Edited by Figster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not one or the other.

 

The defense continued to stop KC and that gave TB more confidence on offense. They did not have to press and could continue to mix run and pass.

 

The offense made sure they rewarded the defense by sustaining drives and scoring points.

 

Complimentary football.

 

Brady did not have to play great and his rather pedestrians QB stats back up that argument.

 

However, he is horribly efficient and generally does not make mistakes that will tilt the field and put his defense in a bad position, or take available points off the board.

 

He will throw it away, or just lay on a fumbled snap, or turf the ball at a covered receiver's feet. He does not try to do things that can turn small miscues into momentum changing mistakes.

 

TB's offensive line kept his uniform clean and their running game either moved the chains or helped keep them in manageable down & distance situations allowing them more playbook options.

 

When in striking distance they put up TD's not FGs.

 

Brady does not accomplish this with most teams out there. It is no fluke that he chose Tampa Bay. They had a loaded roster and were just missing that field general behind center.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great, high fireworks offenses really seem to struggle in the SB lately.

 

Even last year, KC was held down for 3/4 of the game until Mahomes connected with Hill on a ridiculous low % play that if it didn't work would have been game. 

 

I think part of it is that "fancy offenses" tense up when it doesn't go well. They are used to everything working, and when it doesn't they get tight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

Great, high fireworks offenses really seem to struggle in the SB lately.

 

Even last year, KC was held down for 3/4 of the game until Mahomes connected with Hill on a ridiculous low % play that if it didn't work would have been game. 

 

I think part of it is that "fancy offenses" tense up when it doesn't go well. They are used to everything working, and when it doesn't they get tight. 

Get tight or try to force the issue. Andy Reid has a good run game and could have used it more. Perhaps part of it is Mahomes is still a young gun like Allen. Wants to make the big throw everyone is in awww of while Tom Brady on the other hand, is content to hand the ball of, manage the game to his best capabilities. Win in the process. Allens smart, he's watching it all, I'm sure he gets it.

 

Buffalo will climb its way back... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Figster said:

Get tight or try to force the issue. Andy Reid has a good run game and could have used it more. Perhaps part of it is Mahomes is still a young gun like Allen. Wants to make the big throw everyone is in awww of while Tom Brady on the other hand, is content to hand the ball of, manage the game to his best capabilities. Win in the process. Allens smart, he's watching it all, I'm sure he gets it.

 

Buffalo will climb its way back... 

 

Brady is someone Allen studies and looks up to. You can already see it in his game. Be smart, survive. 

 

Allen has learned to take the small stuff this season, and look what it did for the entire offense. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2021 at 7:11 AM, NewEra said:

Zero TDs given up by Brady’s defenses in his last two Super Bowl wins.  Let that sink in.  

 

He’s the GOAT, no question...but his defenses led him to his last two rings and his first.  The Bucs DL deserved the MVP last night 💯 

 

 

 

I have NO love for Brady, but he had a 125.8 rating that should have been higher given the dropped TD pass by the lineman in the EZ. He should have had 4 TD throws.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

Great, high fireworks offenses really seem to struggle in the SB lately.

 

Even last year, KC was held down for 3/4 of the game until Mahomes connected with Hill on a ridiculous low % play that if it didn't work would have been game. 

 

I think part of it is that "fancy offenses" tense up when it doesn't go well. They are used to everything working, and when it doesn't they get tight. 

 

I think if you look over the history of SB wins you will find that it favors teams that have balanced efficiency on offense and have strong defenses - there are always statistical outliers.

 

By offensive balance, I am not thinking 50/50 run/pass but the ability to successfully take what defenses are giving up - it's efficiency. If efficiency dictates calling more passes because that is what the defense is giving up, then you pass more. The key is effective efficiency. If a team keeps only 4 d-linemen and one LB in the box and you cannot run against it - you are not efficiently running and they can cheat towards coverage all day and take away your passing efficiency as well. Queue the fat lady.

 

By strong defense I mean defenses that do not have to rob Peter to pay Paul. Defenses that do not have to sacrifice coverage to stop the run, or sacrifice stopping the run to effectively pressure and cover receivers.

 

Our coaches did a good job this year maximizing our strengths and covering up for a lot of our weaknesses over the course of an injury-plagued season, but when playing the best teams you can't slap enough lipstick on the pig; They will always expose you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is pretty drastic. As much as we want it to be over, Tom looked pretty good on Sunday. When you say a defense carried a Super Bowl Victory, I am thinking something closer to the 2015 Broncos where Manning completed like 50% of his passes for like 150 yards.

 

Brady in his last 2 Super Bowls was a total of 42/64, 463 yards, 3 TD's, and 1 INT. At worst he has been efficient on two pretty good/well rounded teams. And in both games, that efficiency seems to have been the difference between rings 6/7 and no rings at all. And that stone cold efficiency/consistency is what makes Brady the GOAT. He is an accurate passer with the right stuff between the ears, who hardly ever waivers in performance. There are 100 other QB's with higher highs, that if they could hold a higher/more steady midline, would be just as good or better than TB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dave mcbride said:

I have NO love for Brady, but he had a 125.8 rating that should have been higher given the dropped TD pass by the lineman in the EZ. He should have had 4 TD throws.

 

Being fair, I can see the argument that the refs took a KC Int off the board that probably should have stood. The receiver was initiating as much if not more of the contact as the defender.

 

That led to one of those TDs and had it stood it would have put a dent in that QBR storyline.

 

His numbers could have easily changed to something more like 20 of 29 passing for perhaps less than 200 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT, and 1 Sack.

 

Not exactly world-beating, but those kind of officiating judgement calls happen and as an opposing team you have to rise above them, and as an offense take advantage of them.

 

The Bucs did and KC didn't.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2021 at 9:11 PM, NewEra said:

Zero TDs given up by Brady’s defenses in his last two Super Bowl wins.  Let that sink in.  

 

He’s the GOAT, no question...but his defenses led him to his last two rings and his first.  The Bucs DL deserved the MVP last night 💯 

 

 

 

Looking at the Super Bowl games - in isolation - is nearly always greatly misleading. 

 

Individual games are deeply affected by matchups, but bad bounces, by the way the refs call pass interference, by stuff.

 

The 2018 Patriots were the 21st ranked D. They were better than that, Belichick's always been a bend-but-don't-break guy, but they weren't great.

 

And this year's Bucs were a very good defense but not elite. Not sensational at 6th.

 

I don't especially buy Brady as the GOAT, it's not all that obvious how to compare guys like Unitas, like Otto Graham to modern guys, but he's certainly one of the best of all time. Unfortunately. Very glad to get him out of the division.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...