Jump to content

Big Tech/Social Media Censorship. Musk: Blackmailing Advertisers Can ***** Off.


Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

This story is not about Trump…it’s about making sure people have all the information they need to make informed decisions- whether it’s about elections, Covid, War, whatever the issue…information should NOT be censored by the government! 👍

 

Life is about Trump with him.  It can't be good for him to be that angry at one person.  But then again neither can psychosis.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

This story is not about Trump…it’s about making sure people have all the information they need to make informed decisions- whether it’s about elections, Covid, War, whatever the issue…information should NOT be censored by the government! 👍

 

hes not here to converse. hes here to derail the corruption of his priests. he wants to go pages of nonsense so real info gets lost in his garbage pile. that is his only purpose on this board. he will create his own threads and be the only one posting in it to bump relevant topic down. im sure the voices are explaining to him how trump censored the ny times story on twitter lol

 

 

recycled trump meme reply in

 

3.

2.

1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

We all know that it's CHAOS you're after - not the actual substance, right? After all, how many times can you run into a brick wall defending Trump?  

 

If 2022 told you idiots one thing - it's that America doesn't care what the MAGA cult thinks or does.

 

 

You should be on Twitter with all the people who are mentioning that Twitter was censoring it due to nudity or drug pictures, or that Twitter has no obligation to tell the truth. How does this story relate to Trump except that the lies allowed Biden to win 

1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Q. If Elon were to try to take Twitter public again today (new IPO) what would it be valued at?

Remember, he paid $44 billion.

How much do you think? And how are you basing your numbers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

You should be on Twitter with all the people who are mentioning that Twitter was censoring it due to nudity or drug pictures, or that Twitter has no obligation to tell the truth. How does this story relate to Trump except that the lies allowed Biden to win 

How much do you think? And how are you basing your numbers?

I don't have numbers, and I'm not basing it on anything other than Musk trying to weasel out of his original offer, and the flow of advertisers out of Twitter. And the fact that it certainly wasn't a consistently profitable enterprise before he bought it, and the balance sheet is certainly worse now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

It is so amusing watching you fight to stay afloat on a sinking ship…😉

 

But Ive got a life jacket for ya, Billsy…all ya gotta do is say you are against government or political suppression/intimidation of information on Big Tech from both sides…

 

See how easy and fair and balanced that is? Don’t let your stubbornness drown you…we are all wrong from time to time- take the life jacket…👍

 

 

 

Quote

“The burdens of preparing and sitting for any wide-ranging deposition are significant, let alone the deposition of a former senior administration official,” Psaki’s legal team wrote in a November 3 motion to quash the subpoena. “And imposing that burden on Ms. Psaki, a nonparty private citizen, is entirely unwarranted on this record.”

 

Perhaps we should use the Kavanaugh hearing legal standard in this case?  If you didn't do anything wrong, why not agree to an investigation?  If you don't agree to an investigation then that means you probably did some thing wrong so we need to investigate.

 

Still boggles my mind to this day that this was the argument United States Senators most with law degrees were making. Senator Dick Durbin especially comes to mind, but most if not all of the Democrat Senators used it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I don't have numbers, and I'm not basing it on anything other than Musk trying to weasel out of his original offer, and the flow of advertisers out of Twitter. And the fact that it certainly wasn't a consistently profitable enterprise before he bought it, and the balance sheet is certainly worse now.

As you state you have no numbers, and while many advertisers have frozen their ads I bet most of it is virtue signaling. Elon took over a company that losing 4 million a day and had no long term plan for profitablity. We will see where the company is in in 3 years but right now I would not be surprised if it is worth less money but that will happen when your income is based on 20% bots but you only admit 5%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

This story is not about Trump…it’s about making sure people have all the information they need to make informed decisions- whether it’s about elections, Covid, War, whatever the issue…information should NOT be censored by the government! 👍

 

Except when Trump colludes with Fox News, right? That's okay.. we got it.

 

 

lmao

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I don't have numbers, and I'm not basing it on anything other than Musk trying to weasel out of his original offer, and the flow of advertisers out of Twitter. And the fact that it certainly wasn't a consistently profitable enterprise before he bought it, and the balance sheet is certainly worse now.


I really don’t think he bought it to make money.  He bought it to do exactly what he’s doing now. Shining a bright light on the shenanigans that Twitter was involved in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Except when Trump colludes with Fox News, right? That's okay.. we got it.

 

 

lmao

 

 

Billsy, I’m on your side if Trump colluded with media to censor information…I am STRONGLY against that…

 

But the question remains- Are you on my side if the Dems colluded with Big Tech to censor true stories, and ban political opponents?

 

Can we come together on this point?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

Except when Trump colludes with Fox News, right? That's okay.. we got it.

 

 

lmao

 

 

 

I remember when my Mom used to tell me two wrongs don't make a right.  I'm guessing either your Mom never told you that or you didn't listen.  Sad.

Edited by reddogblitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

I remember when my Mom used to tell me two wrongs don't make a right.  I'm guessing either your Mom never told you that or you didn't listen.  Sad.

Bingo…the thing I always ask myself, when I decide what position to take on a particular issue, is ‘would I be ok with my political opposition doing the same thing?’

 

And if the answer is ‘No’, I take a different stance…(And this also happens to be the only way people will respect you- even if they disagree with your point of view). 👍

 

Imo, every belief or political position people take should pertain to all…What’s good for the goose is good for the gander…👍

 

 

Edited by JaCrispy
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Billsy, I’m on your side if Trump colluded with media to censor information…I am STRONGLY against that…

 

But the question remains- Are you on my side if the Dems colluded with Big Tech to censor true stories, and ban political opponents?

 

Can we come together on this point?

 

 

That's the point of it all.  Whatever your views might be we all need to rally around and demand the truth.  No more lies.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

I remember when my Mom used to tell me two wrongs don't make a right.  I'm guessing either your Mom never told you that or you didn't listen.  Sad.


Yeah my mother also taught me critical thinking skills and the importance of having foresight.
 

Yet - here we are exposing the hypocrisy and lack of foresight by the cult and they don’t like it. 
 

MAGA tears - lmao
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Yeah my mother also taught me critical thinking skills and the importance of having foresight.
 

Yet - here we are exposing the hypocrisy and lack of foresight by the cult and they don’t like it. 
 

MAGA tears - lmao
 

 

 

Does it not bother you at all that your cult is doing same thing the other cult is doing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TSOL said:

 

 

Ew

 

16 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Something bad must be coming to their savior Conald Trump - they are clearly worried about something 

 

 

 

 

And you manage to stoop even lower by reposting them. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been saying they’ve been doing this as far back as January 2017 - and if you think it’s just them you’re a delusional communist. 
 

All of Silicon Valley is complicit and took orders from the DNC via the CCP 

 

The Kavanaugh hearings, the Me Too b.s. the 2018 mid terms, Covid, the 2020 election - all “rigged.”

 

The official coup was launched in March 2020

 

America doesn’t exist like you thought it did anymore.  
 

 

 

 


The Cold War never ended. 
 

The Maoists just shifted strategy 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

I’ve been saying they’ve been doing this as far back as January 2017 - and if you think it’s just them you’re a delusional communist. 
 

All of Silicon Valley is complicit and took orders from the DNC via the CCP 

 

The Kavanaugh hearings, the Me Too b.s. the 2018 mid terms, Covid, the 2020 election - all “rigged.”

 

The official coup was launched in March 2020

 

America doesn’t exist like you thought it did anymore.  
 

 

 

 


The Cold War never ended. 
 

The Maoists just shifted strategy 

 

pretty sure section 230 is toast. hopefully its aimed at fixing the laws editorial position they all claim not to have and not all of it. i have a feeling they will be aiming towards sites can be sued for any opinion that is posted by users part as well. in which case social media will no longer exist as censorship gets a jackhammer and anything not pre approved is not posted. the powerful can get back to the handful of stations putting out propaganda they dream about and even this small site will be gone.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Keep trying. 

We can go a night long…

 

You accused me of being a homosexual as an insult. Why are you so homophobic? That sounds like something President Trump would say.

 

And, have you found out what eras of history they teach K-5 in Virginia yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

You accused me of being a homosexual as an insult. Why are you so homophobic? That sounds like something President Trump would say.

 

And, have you found out what eras of history they teach K-5 in Virginia yet?

 

i think your confused. hes not calling you homosexual. read between the lines

 

7 hours ago, BillStime said:


You really try so hard 

 

keep trying, simp. It’s so cute 

 

6 hours ago, BillStime said:


 

We can go all night long…

 

hes ASKING if you are. he wants confirmation so he can take take you out to dinner.

 

Edited by Buffarukus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, TSOL said:

 

 

You're gonna go all night long doing what?

 

Giving the worst takes ever? 

 

Give it up man, you're spent. 😂


What’s funny is the whole Hunter story has been out there for 2+ years and had what impact on the mid terms?

 

giphy.gif?cid=5e214886mwngo7vghfuc9379un

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BillStime said:


What’s funny is the whole Hunter story has been out there for 2+ years and had what impact on the mid terms?

 

giphy.gif?cid=5e214886mwngo7vghfuc9379un

 

 

I agree, the collective intelligence of the American voting public does seem to be in the decline 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...