Jump to content

Trump’s Post Presidency—What Will He Do?


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, aristocrat said:

 

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the story of catturd:

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/catturd2-maga-twitter-shitposting-king-1234674671/

You guys use only the best propaganda sources while mistrusting the "MSM"

The article is a summary of the entire far right misinformation ecosystem including Fox persona;lities.  An alternative reality "news" service to replace actual journalism that they disagree with.  Fascinating but dangerous...Seems many here rewrite the turd's themes.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Sure.  But he won't.  
Not showing any signs of stepping aside with his inflammatory rhetoric.  Look up the THIS IS THE TIME!  tweet today.  If you don't think that's a thinly veiled call to violence then I don't know further debate on anything is fruitful.  Billstime documented above that the dog whistle the mob heard was interpreted as call to action.  Ignoring these actions is the same as condoning them which you seem more than ready to do.  The jerk already incited an insurrection (riot is fine if you prefer).   You think violence in NYC, Georgia or DC might follow his comments?    How you can equate trump's comments now or before the insurrection to Biden's condemning the thugs that were involved is beyond my comprehension.  Keep minimizing the threat and we will see violence.  Perhaps that's what you want.

Many see a legal system that has been effectively weaponized by a political establishment clinging to power, while overseeing a controlled demolition of our country in every way possible, that prosecutes its enemies to fullest extent on even the most minor of offenses while allowing members of the political establishment to without exception skate on even the most egregious of offenses.  Personally, I agree with this assessment, and try as I may, I cannot make any intelligent argument to the contrary given the circumstances.  In this case making a $130,000 payment through an attorney instead of making it directly.  Given the litany of things Trump has been accused of I personally find it comical that his enemies need to settle on something so trivial.  if this fails what the next step?  Checking into a couple unpaid parking tickets?  Are they out to get him?  They sure are and it can't be any more obvious.  

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the story of catturd:

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/catturd2-maga-twitter-shitposting-king-1234674671/

You guys use only the best propaganda sources while mistrusting the "MSM"

The article is a summary of the entire far right misinformation ecosystem including Fox persona;lities.  An alternative reality "news" service to replace actual journalism that they disagree with.  Fascinating but dangerous...Seems many here rewrite the turd's themes.

You are clearly trolling us, right? No one is really gonna use a RS article to prove the other side is lying. They have made up whole stories and been caught lying several times about their "verifications". Only a naive person believes them without getting a LOT more info. I will state that Catturd is clearly a provocateur so everything he says should be taken that way.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

You are clearly trolling us, right? No one is really gonna use a RS article to prove the other side is lying. They have made up whole stories and been caught lying several times about their "verifications". Only a naive person believes them without getting a LOT more info. I will state that Catturd is clearly a provocateur so everything he says should be taken that way.

 

Wait until he/she/they cites Mother Jones and Southern Poverty Law Center with a straight face.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Many see a legal system that has been effectively weaponized by a political establishment clinging to power, while overseeing a controlled demolition of our country in every way possible, that prosecutes its enemies to fullest extent on even the most minor of offenses while allowing members of the political establishment to without exception skate on even the most egregious of offenses.  Personally, I agree with this assessment, and try as I may, I cannot make any intelligent argument to the contrary given the circumstances.  In this case making a $130,000 payment through an attorney instead of making it directly.  Given the litany of things Trump has been accused of I personally find it comical that his enemies need to settle on something so trivial.  if this fails what the next step?  Checking into a couple unpaid parking tickets?  Are they out to get him?  They sure are and it can't be any more obvious.  

Georgia and DC accusations are more profound. Still Gov McDonnell from Va was indicted for similar campaign activities 

https://ballotpedia.org/Former_Virginia_Governor_Bob_McDonnell_and_Star_Scientific

1 hour ago, Orlando Tim said:

You are clearly trolling us, right? No one is really gonna use a RS article to prove the other side is lying. They have made up whole stories and been caught lying several times about their "verifications". Only a naive person believes them without getting a LOT more info. I will state that Catturd is clearly a provocateur so everything he says should be taken that way.

Catturd is the troll. Yet many here clearly follow. What specifically in the RS article do you dispute given your familiarity?

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the story of catturd:

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/catturd2-maga-twitter-shitposting-king-1234674671/

You guys use only the best propaganda sources while mistrusting the "MSM"

The article is a summary of the entire far right misinformation ecosystem including Fox persona;lities.  An alternative reality "news" service to replace actual journalism that they disagree with.  Fascinating but dangerous...Seems many here rewrite the turd's themes.

Fun fact.  Dude has a radio show and you can just engage him. Not some dem pac paid operative.   Btw.  His book is pretty good 

17 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Georgia and DC accusations are more profound. Still Gov McDonnell from Va was indicted for similar campaign activities 

https://ballotpedia.org/Former_Virginia_Governor_Bob_McDonnell_and_Star_Scientific

Catturd is the troll. Yet many here clearly follow. What specifically in the RS article do you dispute given your familiarity?

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/dec/29/rolling-stone-rape-story-uva-five-years. Right off the bat   actually journalism and integrity go together.  Rolling stone has none of the latter.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Georgia and DC accusations are more profound. Still Gov McDonnell from Va was indicted for similar campaign activities 

https://ballotpedia.org/Former_Virginia_Governor_Bob_McDonnell_and_Star_Scientific

You're just proving my point.  The story says the Supreme Court vacated the conviction and DOJ declined to pursue the case.  So, no harm, no foul.  What about fast forwarding to the present to something like Biden's documented family run organized influence peddling operation with entities in places like China?  Millions transferred to family members.  In exchange for what exactly?  That's the concern.  Legal, illegal, that sounds like a national security issue.  Something that requires investigation.  The DOJ checking into it?  Forget about that happening anytime soon. 

 

The potential for a sitting President to be compromised by payoffs from our #1 adversary.  Not a peep about the situation in the media or Washington elites.  The story just doesn't exist.  You swap out Biden for Trump and I guarantee it's a 24/7 shitstorm.  Impeachment, treason, article 25.  The whole 9 yards.  I'm not making any case for defending Trump but merely pointing out there's one set of rules for insiders and another set of rules for outsiders.  Insiders get protection.  Outsiders face prosecution.  Tell me I'm wrong?  

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

 

Carried is the troll. Yet many here clearly follow. What specifically in the RS article do you dispute given your familiarity?

Catturd has yet to make up a story of a rape and lie about "verifications", so maybe he is less troll than RS. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37879151.amp

 

Where did I insinuate I knew anything about Catturd, beyond he is a provocateur? I simply know RS is usually garbage. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Orlando Tim said:

Catturd has yet to make up a story of a rape and lie about "verifications", so maybe he is less troll than RS. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37879151.amp

 

Where did I insinuate I knew anything about Catturd, beyond he is a provocateur? I simply know RS is usually garbage. 

You seem certain that catturd has never made up a story yet claim to not know much about him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

You're just proving my point.  The story says the Supreme Court vacated the conviction and DOJ declined to pursue the case.  So, no harm, no foul.  What about fast forwarding to the present to something like Biden's documented family run organized influence peddling operation with entities in places like China?  Millions transferred to family members.  In exchange for what exactly?  That's the concern.  Legal, illegal, that sounds like a national security issue.  Something that requires investigation.  The DOJ checking into it?  Forget about that happening anytime soon. 

 

The potential for a sitting President to be compromised by payoffs from our #1 adversary.  Not a peep about the situation in the media or Washington elites.  The story just doesn't exist.  You swap out Biden for Trump and I guarantee it's a 24/7 shitstorm.  Impeachment, treason, article 25.  The whole 9 yards.  I'm not making any case for defending Trump but merely pointing out there's one set of rules for insiders and another set of rules for outsiders.  Insiders get protection.  Outsiders face prosecution.  Tell me I'm wrong?  

 

Of course not.  It's how they sleep at night thinking Joke is some great, respected, coherent and chaste leader, to fight their nightmares about Trump.  It's really amazing to witness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the story of catturd:

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/catturd2-maga-twitter-shitposting-king-1234674671/

You guys use only the best propaganda sources while mistrusting the "MSM"

The article is a summary of the entire far right misinformation ecosystem including Fox persona;lities.  An alternative reality "news" service to replace actual journalism that they disagree with.  Fascinating but dangerous...Seems many here rewrite the turd's themes.


You literally made up nazis putting recruiting posters on a trailhead. At least admit you made that up

  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


https://heavy.com/news/alvin-bragg-george-soros/amp/

 

first story popped on google. Bragg did get money from Soros so story is true 

 

 

The story is true.

 

It is standard Red-Tail procedure to try and divert a story by claiming that the source is sketchy.

 

Just ignore it.

 

 

.

 

Meanwhile, back at the thread;

 

Trump will surrender to face charges if indicted, defense lawyer says

CNBC, by Dan Mangan

 

Former President Donald Trump will surrender to face criminal charges if indicted by a Manhattan grand jury, his lawyer said Friday evening. The lawyer, Joseph Tacopina, spoke on the heels of a report by WNBC that federal, state and local law enforcement agencies are preparing security arrangements for the possibility that Trump will be indicted as early as next week. “Will follow normal procedures if it gets to that point,” Tacopina told CNBC when asked what Trump would do if that possibility becomes reality.

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/17/trump-will-surrender-to-face-charges-if-indicted-defense-lawyer-says.html

 

 

 

 

 

George Soros Exposed as Major Force Behind Trump’s Prosecution and Imminent Arrest

by Kyle Becker

 

President Donald Trump reacted to the news of his imminent arrest in New York by pointing out that the Manhattan District Attorney’s office’s “leader is funded by George Soros.” Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg, whom Donald Trump is referring to in his post, was elected in November 2021 with indirect backing from left-wing billionaire George Soros, who gave $1 million to the Color of Change PAC, which spent it to elect Bragg.The Color of Change PAC is a radical activist group that describes itself as “the nation’s largest online racial justice organization.” Fox News reported that Soros has “funneled $40 million dollars into district attorney campaigns nationwide,” including Bragg’s

 

https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/creepy-old-dude-knab/

 

 

 

 

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, redtail hawk said:

You seem certain that catturd has never made up a story yet claim to not know much about him

You said he spreads "misinformation" by quoting people who have been proven in court to have lied. Can you show me where he lied or are you too stupid to engage? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

i think it's pointless to engage...read the article.  and tell me what you find false.

Reminiscent of you whining about Taibbi without being able to point to a single piece of his reporting that was false.
 

That’s different though. Right?

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, B-Man said:

Trump's coming arrest next week will only spur the 70 million voters that supported him to do so again.

 

Considering Biden got 81,000,000 votes in 2020 - and would no doubt get more in 2024 as young people continue to vote and your voters die off - good luck with these "threats"

 

lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Reminder - this BS has already been litigated ...

 

 

The end result ...

 

FridU-6XoAA_vku?format=jpg&name=small

 

 

 

.

You realize this is completely divorced from the case against trump?

6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Reminiscent of you whining about Taibbi without being able to point to a single piece of his reporting that was false.
 

That’s different though. Right?

Either your reading comprehension is subpar or your memory is.  I cited a story with multiple points of evidence.  @BillStime posted a clip of his testimony where his ethics were proven to be weak

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

i think it's pointless to engage...read the article.  and tell me what you find false.

You expect me to pay to read something from a group who has been proven to be liars? But you are right it is pointless, you made an accusation without evidence and then stated I had to prove a negative. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

You realize this is completely divorced from the case against trump?

Either your reading comprehension is subpar or your memory is.  I cited a story with multiple points of evidence.  @BillStime posted a clip of his testimony where his ethics were proven to be weak

What evidence did you provide? Why be so secretive. All I’ve seen from you is declaring the guy to be Kari Lake/maga. You would be better off just saying you don’t know the first thing about his reporting. Let’s discuss where his reporting has been false. Educate me. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

What evidence did you provide? Why be so secretive. All I’ve seen from you is declaring the guy to be Kari Lake/maga. You would be better off just saying you don’t know the first thing about his reporting. Let’s discuss where his reporting has been false. Educate me. 

https://news.yahoo.com/matt-taibbi-smirks-house-committee-000115911.html

read it and weep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Read it and weep? That article is your “evidence” that Taibbi’s reporting is false? Good god man. That article is nothing but a transcript of the hearing where bloviating politicians cut off “the witness” every time he speaks. Your blinders probably prevent you from noticing that every politician does the same regardless of party, and it’s pathetic. 
 

You have been told that Taibbi is bad and you are running with it. All despite not being able to highlight a single falsehood in his reporting. Someone your age should make more effort to think for themselves. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The twitter files are solid evidence.

 

Hysterical attempts to try and smear a decades long famous liberal reporter because he dared to write about them is such a obvious exposure of the 

weak minded posters that we have here on PPP.

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Read it and weep? That article is your “evidence” that Taibbi’s reporting is false? Good god man. That article is nothing but a transcript of the hearing where bloviating politicians cut off “the witness” every time he speaks. Your blinders probably prevent you from noticing that every politician does the same regardless of party, and it’s pathetic. 
 

You have been told that Taibbi is bad and you are running with it. All despite not being able to highlight a single falsehood in his reporting. Someone your age should make more effort to think for themselves. 

Taibbi nor Shellenberger sought any "hidden" docs on twitter interference by trump or the right of which there is plenty to find.  They also received their info from an extremely biased source without question.   Hell, most of your haven't conceded that ol tuck is a liar despite irrefutable evidence.  Nothing I write will prompt your concession.  carry on with your bs...ugh, exhausting especially after helping host a party for over 200 last night.  There may have even been some MAGA's there.  We weren't wearing our Scarlet Letters (oops, has that book been banned?).

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Andrew McCarthy Lays Out What a Turkey the 'Nakedly Political' Case Is Against Trump

By Nick Arama

 

FTA:

 

Andrew McCarthy, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, into the phalanx of folks finding a big problem with such potential action. He’s not shy about it either. He wrote in his National Review column that the reported indictment against Trump was a “disgrace” and was a “nakedly political” move by a progressive prosecutor to benefit the Democratic party in the “long term.”

 

Bragg is engaged in bare-naked politics. The case is not merely unworthy as a prosecution of Trump (which is why federal prosecutors walked away from it years ago, as did Bragg before he was pressured by progressive Democrats into reviving it); it is also a case that everyone knows Bragg would never bring against anyone other than Trump.

 

Crime is rampant in New York, in part because Bragg’s default position is leniency and often non-prosecution when it comes to hardened criminals. Here, the case of falsifying business records against Trump…is, at best, a nonviolent misdemeanor that is stale and that could be inflated into a felony only by theories that are legally and factually dubious. This is a classic, invidious selective prosecution. It is being launched strictly for political purposes.

 

McCarthy also pointed out to Fox’s Brian Kilmeade that this case hinges on the testimony of Daniels and former Trump attorney Michael Cohen, both of whom have credibility problems.

 

“[Bragg] walked away from it Brian and my old office, the Southern District of New York, the federal prosecutors in Manhattan also wanted no part of this case, which hinges not only on the testimony of the porn star Stormy Daniels, who, you know, look, I think it’s credible for her to claim that this happened way back when, but at the same time, you know, she’s on record a couple of times saying it didn’t happen,” McCarthy said. “The other crucial witness here is Michael Cohen and I think, probably, the feds walked away from him because of his deep credibility problems. So you’re not starting out in a great place with those witnesses.”

 

Even folks like McCarthy who are not fans of Trump get what a ridiculous pile of bull cookies this case is and are willing to admit it. That says a lot about how desperate Democrats are with this move. There’s a lot of speculation as to what may be behind it — from trying to provoke the base to Democrats thinking that this will help Trump win the nomination and then they can defeat him in the general election. McCarthy speculates that the last point may be where Democrats might be going with this. That may be in someone’s mind. But that thought didn’t work out very well in 2016.

 

The bottom line is that whatever the move here is, it’s wrong, it’s political and everyone on all sides of the aisle should be calling it out.

 

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/03/19/andrew-mccarthy-lays-out-what-a-turkey-the-nakedly-political-case-is-against-trump-n718456

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/progressive-democrat-braggs-motivation-in-nakedly-political-indictment-of-trump/

 

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/03/18/jonathan-turley-destroys-the-d-a-s-case-against-trump-its-all-about-theatrics-n718332

 

 

 

 

 

.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Taibbi nor Shellenberger sought any "hidden" docs on twitter interference by trump or the right of which there is plenty to find.  They also received their info from an extremely biased source without question.   Hell, most of your haven't conceded that ol tuck is a liar despite irrefutable evidence.  Nothing I write will prompt your concession.  carry on with your bs...ugh, exhausting especially after helping host a party for over 200 last night.  There may have even been some MAGA's there.  We weren't wearing our Scarlet Letters (oops, has that book been banned?).

Qualifies as a superspreader event unless you confirmed everyone was vaccinated. If you took that common sense precaution, you can be certain nobody could catch nor transmit deadly coronavirus. At a minimum I hope everyone did their part and stayed six feet apart. 
 

I will continue waiting patiently for the evidence of Taibbi reporting false information. No rush. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...