Jump to content

Presidential Debates 2020


B-Man

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

First impressions - for the undecided and those in the Republican party in doubt. 

 

 

https://news.yahoo.com/trumpworld-worried-amid-debate-performance-220600606.html

 

Trumpworld 'worried' amid debate performance fallout

WASHINGTON — Some of President Donald Trump's allies said after his chaotic first debate that he had squandered one of his last opportunities to change the dynamics of a race in which he has long trailed by diverting from the strategy his team had laid out, coming off as mean and angry rather than confident and in command.

 

Advisers say Trump missed repeated chances to deal blows to Democratic nominee Joe Biden in areas they had prepped for, such as China and past comments Biden had made about race, while failing to lay out his own case for what a second term would look like. The mood around the campaign and the White House on Wednesday morning was described as "worried," "quiet" and "in shock," people familiar with the situation said.

 

"Trump lost one of the remaining opportunities he had to reshape the election and not walk into Election Day as the underdog," said a former White House official, who added a hopeful note: "But he walked into Election Day last time an underdog and won, so maybe he doesn't need to reshape the election."

 

``````````````````````````

So, Agent Chaos can say he won.   He didn't 

Notice a common theme in the bolded and red above? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Trump debate decoded: He won, and he won big

by Andrea Widburg

 

Original Article

 

With 24 hours having passed since the first presidential debate, it’s becoming clear that Trump won in a big way. It wasn’t an apparent victory, but it was a real one: He showed his base and ordinary Americans that he will always fight while forcing Biden to disavow both his hard-left base and the last of the old-fashioned Democrats who still support him

 

Don’t pay too much attention to the pessimistic pundits. The worriers worried, the haters hated, the ambivalent were ambivalent, the cheerleaders cheered. Personality may not be destiny, but it determines post-debates reviews

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No Hillary supports American values 

 

The Rising Democratic Majority will take care that American values are followed 

  Are the puppet strings attached to you at just the arms or legs or do you have additional ones that allow you to pull stuff out of your nether regions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

The Trump debate decoded: He won, and he won big

by Andrea Widburg

 

Original Article

 

With 24 hours having passed since the first presidential debate, it’s becoming clear that Trump won in a big way. It wasn’t an apparent victory, but it was a real one: He showed his base and ordinary Americans that he will always fight while forcing Biden to disavow both his hard-left base and the last of the old-fashioned Democrats who still support him

 

Don’t pay too much attention to the pessimistic pundits. The worriers worried, the haters hated, the ambivalent were ambivalent, the cheerleaders cheered. Personality may not be destiny, but it determines post-debates reviews

 

 

lol, oh shut up images-4.jpg.0ab2ce5a47a9a1e01ef50d8359ef526a.jpgimages-3.jpg.a06d8f8da43cb493a33d1f22287ffbc3.jpg

3 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Are the puppet strings attached to you at just the arms or legs or do you have additional ones that allow you to pull stuff out of your nether regions?

I just have strings. What's your game? Hand up the butt making your sock puppet talk? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

Gator, with his standard hysterics.

:lol:

 

 

 

 

KRUISER’S MORNING BRIEF: It’s Time That Democrats Are Asked to Condemn Some Things. 

 

“It’s farcical that Trump is being forced to condemn the violence in America when most of it is being directed at him.

 

In a sane world, journalists would be pressing Biden to disavow not only antifa, but the anti-cop, anti-American Black Lives Matter movement as well.

 

Both groups have become threats to national security.”

 
 
 
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, B-Man said:

The Trump debate decoded: He won, and he won big

by Andrea Widburg

 

Original Article

 

With 24 hours having passed since the first presidential debate, it’s becoming clear that Trump won in a big way. It wasn’t an apparent victory, but it was a real one: He showed his base and ordinary Americans that he will always fight while forcing Biden to disavow both his hard-left base and the last of the old-fashioned Democrats who still support him

 

Don’t pay too much attention to the pessimistic pundits. The worriers worried, the haters hated, the ambivalent were ambivalent, the cheerleaders cheered. Personality may not be destiny, but it determines post-debates reviews

 

 

If the MSM reported on a football game in which the Right beat the Left by a score of 52-3 their headline would read "The Left Mounts a Furious Comeback and Outscores The Right In The Final Minute of The Game".  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Gator, with his standard hysterics.

:lol:

 

 

 

 

KRUISER’S MORNING BRIEF: It’s Time That Democrats Are Asked to Condemn Some Things. 

 

“It’s farcical that Trump is being forced to condemn the violence in America when most of it is being directed at him.

 

In a sane world, journalists would be pressing Biden to disavow not only antifa, but the anti-cop, anti-American Black Lives Matter movement as well.

 

Both groups have become threats to national security.”

 
 
 
 

 

Trump could of changed his diaper on stage and you'd find some right wing pundit to say it was the greatest 

3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

If the MSM reported on a football game in which the Right beat the Left by a score of 52-3 their headline would read "The Left Mounts a Furious Comeback and Outscores The Right In The Final Minute of The Game".  

So you think Trump's debate performance was good? Just yelling like a maniac? 

 

Cult 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No Hillary supports American values 

 

The Rising Democratic Majority will take care that American values are followed 


Oh. My. God. 
 

Well the Democrats are not supporting the 1st Amendment. It specifically states the right of the people to peacefully assemble/worship and that’s being denied unless the people have Molotov cocktails and are screaming BLACK LIVES MATTER. 

 

The Democrats have forbade businesses from conducting business. 
 

Democrats via ‘hate speech’ laws are trying to destroy free speech. 
 

Democrats are pushing racist, Critical Race Theory. 
 

Maybe you need to learn about American Values because I don’t think they are what you think they are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said:

If you're going to post pictures of yourself you should post a recent one like this:

 

See the source image

Yes, that was me after listening to your HERO Trump ramble and yell through a PRESIDENTIAL debate. Disgraceful. 

 

You should follow him to Moscow after the election 

 

Just now, Dragoon said:


Oh. My. God. 
 

Well the Democrats are not supporting the 1st Amendment. It specifically states the right of the people to peacefully assemble/worship and that’s being denied unless the people have Molotov cocktails and are screaming BLACK LIVES MATTER. 

 

The Democrats have forbade businesses from conducting business. 
 

Democrats via ‘hate speech’ laws are trying to destroy free speech. 
 

Democrats are pushing racist, Critical Race Theory. 
 

Maybe you need to learn about American Values because I don’t think they are what you think they are. 

Democrats are expanding voting rights

Helping people get coverage to see a doctor

Taking the pandemic serious

Taking our sacred alliance with he other DEMOCRATIC countries seriously 

 

 

All that stuff you are complaining about is pure propagandistic nonsense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Yes, that was me after listening to your HERO Trump ramble and yell through a PRESIDENTIAL debate. Disgraceful. 

 

You should follow him to Moscow after the election 

 

Democrats are expanding voting rights

Helping people get coverage to see a doctor

Taking the pandemic serious

Taking our sacred alliance with he other DEMOCRATIC countries seriously 

 

 

All that stuff you are complaining about is pure propagandistic nonsense 

- Democrats are creating instability in ensuring that mail in ballots create havoc and chaos so they can dispute the election. 
 

- Democrats are trying to take money away from earners and force doctors to work for wages below fair market value

 

- Democrats are using the “pandemic” to inflame the masses through mass incarceration and destroying the economy to blame it on Trump. 
 

- What sacred alliances? My god. What nonsense. I gotta get off here, I got work to do 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This election and the debates aren't about convincing undecided voters.  There aren't any undecided voters in 2020, at least not enough to make a difference like in past elections.  Trump did energize his base though while getting Biden to make statements that destabilize his, such that it is.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BillsFanNC said:

This election and the debates aren't about convincing undecided voters.  There aren't any undecided voters in 2020, at least not enough to make a difference like in past elections.  Trump did energize his base though while getting Biden to make statements that destabilize his, such that it is.  

So his base was energized by that infantile performance? That says a lot 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

This election and the debates aren't about convincing undecided voters.  There aren't any undecided voters in 2020, at least not enough to make a difference like in past elections.  Trump did energize his base though while getting Biden to make statements that destabilize his, such that it is.  

I rate this statement as mostly true....except the part about Biden "making statements that destabilize his".  We all know, Biden was not the first choice of many on the left...but second to last overall.  Nobody went in to that debate wooed over by Trumps' idiocy.  He didn't let Biden speak enough to make any de-stabilizing statements...I know, all the conservative trump-suckers think him dis-avowing the "Green New Deal" was a big deal...it wasn't.  He has been disassociating himself from the GND from the outset.  People who aren't totally lost (ie: those not bowing before Trump) know that Trump is about the worst thing to happen to America since 9/11.  They aren't as myopic a group as you might think.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Buftex said:

I rate this statement as mostly true....except the part about Biden "making statements that destabilize his".  We all know, Biden was not the first choice of many on the left...but second to last overall.  Nobody went in to that debate wooed over by Trumps' idiocy.  He didn't let Biden speak enough to make any de-stabilizing statements...I know, all the conservative trump-suckers think him dis-avowing the "Green New Deal" was a big deal...it wasn't.  He has been disassociating himself from the GND from the outset.  People who aren't totally lost (ie: those not bowing before Trump) know that Trump is about the worst thing to happen to America since 9/11.  They aren't as myopic a group as you might think.  

 

Repeating the "Trump is a racist and so are all his deplorable supporters" strategy that worked so beautifully in 2016 suggests otherwise. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buftex said:

I rate this statement as mostly true....except the part about Biden "making statements that destabilize his".  We all know, Biden was not the first choice of many on the left...but second to last overall.  Nobody went in to that debate wooed over by Trumps' idiocy.  He didn't let Biden speak enough to make any de-stabilizing statements...I know, all the conservative trump-suckers think him dis-avowing the "Green New Deal" was a big deal...it wasn't.  He has been disassociating himself from the GND from the outset.  People who aren't totally lost (ie: those not bowing before Trump) know that Trump is about the worst thing to happen to America since 9/11.  They aren't as myopic a group as you might think.  

Well if he's been disassociating himself from the Green New Deal then he probably should revise his website. It clearly states that his environmental plans are based on the Green New Deal. If you would look through this thread you would see that statement quoted here several times. So, the conclusion is that you are just wrong, again. Why is it that you and some others arrive to the debate without ever knowing yourshit? Don't you ever get embarrassed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Well if he's been disassociating himself from the Green New Deal then he probably should revise his website. It clearly states that his environmental plans are based on the Green New Deal. If you would look through this thread you would see that statement quoted here several times. So, the conclusion is that you are just wrong, again. Why is it that you and some others arrive to the debate without ever knowing yourshit? Don't you ever get embarrassed?

I have been embarrassed for you plenty of times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/02/trump-has-condemned-white-supremacists/

 

Trump Has Condemned White Supremacists

 

how many damn times does he have to denounce it?  every speech?   

 

Not every speech, but when he is asked in a debate to condemn it, he probably should. It's a pretty easy thing to condemn.

 

Do you think participants in a debate should refuse to answer a question if they commented on it before?

Edited by wAcKy ZeBrA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

 

Not every speech, but when he is asked in a debate to condemn it, he probably should. It's a pretty easy thing to condemn.

 

Do you think participants in a debate should refuse to answer a question if they commented on it before?

 

so you agree that he has in fact condemned racism and all that goes with it in the past?  many times in fact?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, aristocrat said:

 

so you agree that he has in fact condemned racism and all that goes with it in the past?  many times in fact?

 

I'll answer your question after you answer mine.

 

2 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

 

Not every speech, but when he is asked in a debate to condemn it, he probably should. It's a pretty easy thing to condemn.

 

Do you think participants in a debate should refuse to answer a question if they commented on it before?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

 

Not every speech, but when he is asked in a debate to condemn it, he probably should. It's a pretty easy thing to condemn.

 

Do you think participants in a debate should refuse to answer a question if they commented on it before?

 

he didn't refuse he answered it by saying sure 3 times to decouncing racism, then said stand down, stand by.  then the next day said they should stand down and let the law enforcement people do their job.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/02/trump-has-condemned-white-supremacists/

 

Trump Has Condemned White Supremacists

 

how many damn times does he have to denounce it?  every speech?   


Yeah it’s pretty big deal - you don’t miss ANy opportunity to put out this fire.

 

There is a reason why he didn’t do it the other night - racists make up a good percentage of his base.  How sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

 

Not every speech, but when he is asked in a debate to condemn it, he probably should. It's a pretty easy thing to condemn.

 

Do you think participants in a debate should refuse to answer a question if they commented on it before?

Someone refused to answer if they would pack the SCOTUS, get rid of the Electoral College and won't take a stand on making Puerto Rico or DC a state. I think his reason for refusing to answer the question about packing the SCOTUS was that he didn't want to make that an issue. Defend that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

he didn't refuse he answered it by saying sure 3 times to decouncing racism, then said stand down, stand by

 

So he didn't condemn white supremecy?

 

Just now, 3rdnlng said:

Someone refused to answer if they would pack the SCOTUS, get rid of the Electoral College and won't take a stand on making Puerto Rico or DC a state. I think his reason for refusing to answer the question about packing the SCOTUS was that he didn't want to make that an issue. Defend that.

 

I agree. It's pretty obvious.

Edited by wAcKy ZeBrA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...