Jump to content

There should be a national dialogue in getting back to work


Magox

Recommended Posts

If these numbers are true, expect a fast rethinking of "not going back to school" by the Democrats. The article goes into how the 18-24 year old group have been notoriously bad about voting, but the Obama machine shook the bushes and got them there. It goes on to explain how colleges have been very good lately about getting students to vote, etc...
 


 


 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

If these numbers are true, expect a fast rethinking of "not going back to school" by the Democrats. The article goes into how the 18-24 year old group have been notoriously bad about voting, but the Obama machine shook the bushes and got them there. It goes on to explain how colleges have been very good lately about getting students to vote, etc...
 

 

I must be getting old cause I hadn't thought of this... To a large extent aside from unions, this is also where the Democrats get their foot soldiers to put up signs and such. Republicans won't be as affected because "grown ups" do a lot of their work for them... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RiotAct said:

oh man, I was an undergrad at UB during the ‘08 election.  I was looked at like I had four heads if I dared tell anyone that I was planning on voting for McCain.


As you should have been. LOL

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2020 at 4:25 PM, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

ICE tells students on visas they must leave US if schools go online-only
 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced Monday that international students in the U.S. whose schools switch to online classes for the fall semester will have to leave the country or risk violating their visa status.
 

Under the new rule, foreign nationals enrolled in U.S. educational institutions will have to leave the country unless part of their course load this fall is taken in-person.
 

</snip>


 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My mother is thrilled to be able to see my father again soon.

 

New York to allow limited visitors to nursing homes again

 

Limited visits to residents in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities where there have been no Covid-19 cases for at least 28 days can begin in five days, State Health Department Commissioner Dr. Howard Zucker announced Friday.

 

Residents can have up to two visitors at a time. Visitors must have their temperatures checked, wear a face covering and maintain social distancing, Zucker said.

 

</snip>

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

My mother is thrilled to be able to see my father again soon.

 

New York to allow limited visitors to nursing homes again

 

Limited visits to residents in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities where there have been no Covid-19 cases for at least 28 days can begin in five days, State Health Department Commissioner Dr. Howard Zucker announced Friday.

 

Residents can have up to two visitors at a time. Visitors must have their temperatures checked, wear a face covering and maintain social distancing, Zucker said.

 

</snip>


IDK. That 28 day free requirement seems like a high barrier to pass nowadays 

 

I pray that they will get together 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, B-Man said:


IDK. That 28 day free requirement seems like a high barrier to pass nowadays 

 

I pray that they will get together 

 

 


AND they are only letting 10% visitors in. So, if the facility has 200 residents, only 20 visitors (per day? at a time?). She is going to find out if they have a list (appointment) and realizes she will not be able to see him daily until the restrictions are loosened (she used to go for 6 hours a day, every day).

 

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/8/2020 at 6:24 PM, Buffalo_Gal said:

If these numbers are true, expect a fast rethinking of "not going back to school" by the Democrats. The article goes into how the 18-24 year old group have been notoriously bad about voting, but the Obama machine shook the bushes and got them there. It goes on to explain how colleges have been very good lately about getting students to vote, etc...
 


 


 

 

 

 

 


 

This does seem to make sense.  The GOTV campus programs are powerful motivating factors for students to register and vote.  No matter what happens this fall the GOTV effectiveness won’t be at 100%.   Could end up playing a decisive factor in the elections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Housing construction sees 55% year over year growth.

 

Quote

 

It is the perfect storm for the nation’s homebuilders. A sharp decline in the supply of existing homes for sale, increasing consumer preference for brand-new, high-tech homes with all the amenities for working and schooling, as well as an accelerating flight to the suburbs and exurbs made for remarkable housing demand in June.

While the official government count isn’t out until the end of the month, sales of newly built homes jumped 55% annually in June, according to a monthly survey by John Burns Real Estate Consulting, which has historically mirrored the U.S. Census report. It was the largest annual gain since homebuilding began again following the epic housing crash a decade ago.

 

It is also the highest pace of sales growth since the height of the unprecedented housing boom in 2005. That expansion was driven by negligent lending in the subprime mortgage market. This boom appears to be driven by the coronavirus pandemic.

“The anecdotal evidence is overwhelming. Sales in the distant commuter areas are the most robust,” said John Burns, founder and CEO of JBRC. “I believe a lot of computer-oriented people have proven to their co-workers that they can be productive from home, and have sensed, or officially been given the green light, to work from home at least a significant portion of the time after a vaccine has been found.”

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/10/2020 at 5:12 PM, Buffalo_Gal said:


AND they are only letting 10% visitors in. So, if the facility has 200 residents, only 20 visitors (per day? at a time?). She is going to find out if they have a list (appointment) and realizes she will not be able to see him daily until the restrictions are loosened (she used to go for 6 hours a day, every day).

 

 

The article said that 10 residents could have visitors at a time at a 100 home facility.  But a home like that would have to have at least 2 areas for visitors to meet residents as only 10 total people could be in 1 area at a time.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Taro T said:

 

The article said that 10 residents could have visitors at a time at a 100 home facility.  But a home like that would have to have at least 2 areas for visitors to meet residents as only 10 total people could be in 1 area at a time.


They sent out a press release before informing the nursing homes about anything. When my mother called, she was the second person they had heard from and the staff at his nursing home knew nothing. Starts Wednesday {crosses fingers} Since there is a limit of two visitors per resident (10/100, limit 2 people per resident), we all told her we would back off until she gave us the all clear.

The 10 total people in one area is going to really cause havoc at mealtimes.

 

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


They sent out a press release before informing the nursing homes about anything. When my mother called, she was the second person they had heard from and the staff at his nursing home knew nothing. Starts Wednesday {crosses fingers} Since there is a limit of two visitors per resident (10/100, limit 2 people per resident), we all told her we would back off until she gave us the all clear.

The 10 total people in one area is going to really cause havoc at mealtimes.

 

 

Spending the month in Saratoga Springs for a bunch of reasons. Driving on Saturday morning, I saw a bunch of people outside an apartment building on lawn chairs facing the building. I thought it looked odd until I realized it was a nursing home and they were talking to loved ones through the windows. I got choked up once I realized. 

 

I used to visit my brother in prison for 7 years. Our visits seemed better than that setup. I hope it doesn't last much longer.

Edited by shoshin
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, shoshin said:

 

Spending the month in Saratoga Springs for a bunch of reasons. Driving on Saturday morning, I saw a bunch of people outside an apartment building on lawn chairs facing the building. I thought it looked odd until I realized it was a nursing home and they were talking to loved ones through the windows. I got choked up once I realized. 

 

I used to visit my brother in prison for 7 years. Our visits seemed better than that setup. I hope it doesn't last much longer.

I’ve got to ask. What did your brother do? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, shoshin said:

 

Spending the month in Saratoga Springs for a bunch of reasons. Driving on Saturday morning, I saw a bunch of people outside an apartment building on lawn chairs facing the building. I thought it looked odd until I realized it was a nursing home and they were talking to loved ones through the windows. I got choked up once I realized. 

 

I used to visit my brother in prison for 7 years. Our visits seemed better than that setup. I hope it doesn't last much longer.


I am sorry to hear about your brother. I hope he is now out. 
 

My father’s nursing home has a large picture window and those that could see well enough and recognize people, did have those types of visits (my father can do neither most days). People would hold up signs for the residents they were visiting. No way could a conversation be had. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

I’ve got to ask. What did your brother do? 


It’s a really inspiring story in the end. I’ll send you a link. He’s been written up, interviewed, and even had some writers start to reach out. Who knows: Maybe my little brother will go Hollywood!

 

But it was a long 7 years and his story is the far extreme end of the bell curve outcome.  

Edited by shoshin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

 

Nut job housewife cook and blatherer  tries logic....fails...WTF does this even mean other than to support the concept that the virus is still relevant enough that closed public gathering places can’t open yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

 

 The source aside (Jesus really?), that goes against what they are seeing elsewhere with kids and transmission. 

 

Today will an interesting catchup day. I expect us to be well back above 1000 deaths, which is just a number but it was nice to be below it for so long. 

Edited by shoshin
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

“The emergency” continues in Minnesota. So declared Governor Walz by executive order extending his rule by decree for another 30 days yesterday. That would be executive order number 78 for the year. He won’t be yielding control back to his subjects any time soon. Indeed, he is mulling over a statewide mandate to wear masks.

 

Unfortunately for us, the end of one-man rule requires either self-restraint by the governor or the concurrence of both houses of the Minnesota legislature.

 

Only the Minnesota Senate thinks continued one-man rule is a bad idea at this point.

 

New deaths attributed to the epidemic have cratered. In the past three days, for example, the authorities have reported four (7/11), three (7/12), and two (7/13) new deaths. Six of the 9 new deaths occurred among residents of long-term care facilities. As I noted over the weekend, the median age of decedents as last reported is 83.6. The number of hospitalizations attributed to the disease would be unnoticeable under normal circumstances. It should be difficult to sustain the panic and to make the case that one-man rule is warranted on these facts.

 

New cases continue to accumulate, but the new cases are trending younger. The median age is now down to 37.6 — a good thing because the risk of serious health consequences is so much lower for the young.

 

That’s not quite the way Pulitzer Prize-winning Star Tribune health care reporter Jeremy Olson puts it in his daily reports, such as this one yesterday. Olson writes:

The two deaths reported Monday — both involving people 80 or older — represented the lowest daily total since April 13.

 

Deaths remain more common among people who are older or have underlying health conditions [translation: they account for some 98 percent of all deaths attributed to the epidemic]. People 70 and older make up only 10% of known cases but 81% of deaths. Only two deaths have been reported among people 29 and younger, even though they make up 35% of the state’s known infections.

 

State health officials worry that a recent uptick in COVID-19 cases among young adults and teenagers could spread the virus to people at higher risk — which would result in more deaths and hospitalizations.

 

 

Olson faithfully conveys the alleged state of mind of “state health officials.” He tacitly supports the reasonableness of their alleged fears. 

 

 

More at the link: https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/07/coronavirus-in-one-state-71.php

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, shoshin said:

 

 

Today will an interesting catchup day. I expect us to be well back above 1000 deaths, which is just a number but it was nice to be below it for so long. 

 

Unless CA or TX puts out a huge number of deaths, we may not be above 1000, which would be surprising and welcome data given the rise at the end of last week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...