Jump to content

Huge Bills contingent at Clemson pro day


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Reed83HOF said:

I will be bummed if we pick Higgins, just have no love for this guy. Gets dinged up, not good a releasing, can suffer from the dropsies, not great at seperation, not great at YAC = not what I want, especially at 22

Don't want to beat up on the guy too much (I've made several posts about him already), but I feel the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, par73 said:

Don't want to beat up on the guy too much (I've made several posts about him already), but I feel the same way.

I mean I don't hate him, just not a great for for us and see a skill vs need/want mismatch.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:

He misses time during the games, my best friend went to Clemson and is a huge fan (I have watched enough games), personally I see a Will Fuller type player in him.

 

What he does have:

 

1.) good catch radius

2.) makes contested catches

3.) body control

4.) good on the outside

 

What he doesn't have:

 

1.) struggles in tight spaces (dropsies) and

2.) does not get good separation,

3.) YAC is based on big plays and not on stopping making a defender miss and taking it to the house

4.) limited route tree - is this based on slower agility and he can only be effective on the outside (as Beane says are the coaches protecting the player?)

5.) double digit receptions 

 

 What we are missing on the team

 

1.) Separation

2.) YAC

3.) consistent catching

 

What Daboll requires:

 

1.) good route tree

2.) I am going to generalize here, but the WR needs to have a brain in his skull to read the D and change their route

 

Where I struggle is:

 

1.) a limited route tree (by far better on the outside than in,

2.) doesn't make players miss

3.) most of his success (stats) have been on downfield plays, which is not a staple of our offense. Josh as of now is a short and mid throw passer, our OL is not great and we want to get the ball out of his hands quicker. A slower WR who seems to be an outside only guy who plays better with the long ball than the short =/= what we are doing on offense. There are simply better players who fit the mold

 

Edit: forgot to mention this - Is he CJ Spiller/Sammy level clemson intelligent?

We could also use some height at WR.  A wr that is always open, regardless of separation.  He IS that.  He has tremendous hands and catches almost everything in his grasp (minus some lapses on easy grabs).  
 

I think his RAC is under appreciated to be honest.  It’s not great but he knows how to maximize yardage from what I’ve seen. 
 

When you have those hands and that size you don’t always need separation.

 

i get it.  You want more explosiveness and there are more explosive WRs in this draft.  Makes sense, I don’t blame you.  I just think Higgins is better than you  think he is.
 

A lot will depend on his QBs ability (as is with many WRs).   Allen might not be a good fit if he can’t get it close.  He’s gonna need a qb that can get it within range.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:

I mean I don't hate him, just not a great for for us and see a skill vs need/want mismatch.

 

 

Nor do I hate him.   I just don't want him at #22.

 

Now if he falls into Round 2, I won't feel bad if Beane trades up to get him in the #35-40 range, where I feel his value is more appropriate.

 

Just don't overdraft for need, which I trust this front office (if not TSW) to do...

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NewEra said:

We could also use some height at WR.  A wr that is always open, regardless of separation.  He IS that.  He has tremendous hands and catches almost everything in his grasp (minus some lapses on easy grabs).  
 

I think his RAC is under appreciated to be honest.  It’s not great but he knows how to maximize yardage from what I’ve seen. 
 

When you have those hands and that size you don’t always need separation.

 

i get it.  You want more explosiveness and there are more explosive WRs in this draft.  Makes sense, I don’t blame you.  I just think Higgins is better than you  think he is.
 

A lot will depend on his QBs ability (as is with many WRs).   Allen might not be a good fit if he can’t get it close.  He’s gonna need a qb that can get it within range.

 

With your top point on size and always open - I used to feel that way as well. I think I have evolved past that though. I need someone who can separate and catch. As McD says, I want someone who can catch the ball - we have had too many drops (higgins catches the ball). IIRC, Josh is better when he gets rid of the ball in under 2.5 seconds - so knowing what route to run based on the D (and be able to go in or out) and be open in 2.5 seconds is a skill I am looking highly at right now. In that short time frame, making a catch in tight quarters and being able to accelerate to generate YAC and make some people miss is at the top of my list for needs in a WR.

 

When I hear a WR who is big and open regardless of speartation I envision that player as the QBs best friend, a TE, which is where I like that profile a lot, someone who can be mean like Knox (when he holds on to the ball).

 

It's not that I don't like Higgins, just feel he isn't a match skill wise for what I see at least. I think he will be a solid WR in the NFL. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, thebandit27 said:


Simpson is a MAN.

Simpson completely neutralized Quinnen Williams in last year's championship game. But .. he was not so good at the Senior bowl. So which Simpson will we get? I dont mind using a 4th rounder on him at all. Can probably fill in for Spain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said:

 

With your top point on size and always open - I used to feel that way as well. I think I have evolved past that though. I need someone who can separate and catch. As McD says, I want someone who can catch the ball - we have had too many drops (higgins catches the ball). IIRC, Josh is better when he gets rid of the ball in under 2.5 seconds - so knowing what route to run based on the D (and be able to go in or out) and be open in 2.5 seconds is a skill I am looking highly at right now. In that short time frame, making a catch in tight quarters and being able to accelerate to generate YAC and make some people miss is at the top of my list for needs in a WR.

 

When I hear a WR who is big and open regardless of speartation I envision that player as the QBs best friend, a TE, which is where I like that profile a lot, someone who can be mean like Knox (when he holds on to the ball).

 

It's not that I don't like Higgins, just feel he isn't a match skill wise for what I see at least. I think he will be a solid WR in the NFL. 

I feel Josh is wants a big target.  Duke actually plays vs the Texans and leads the team in targets with 10.  Maybe that was due to the Texans scheme, regardless, he threw the big mans way.  
 

I really like mims too.  Wouldn’t be upset if we took him before Tee.  Lots to like in this draft.  I think we’re going to get exactly the guy Beane and McD want.  
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Reed83HOF said:

He misses time during the games, my best friend went to Clemson and is a huge fan (I have watched enough games), personally I see a Will Fuller type player in him.

 

What he does have:

 

1.) good catch radius

2.) makes contested catches

3.) body control

4.) good on the outside

 

What he doesn't have:

 

1.) struggles in tight spaces (dropsies) and

2.) does not get good separation,

3.) YAC is based on big plays and not on stopping making a defender miss and taking it to the house

4.) limited route tree - is this based on slower agility and he can only be effective on the outside (as Beane says are the coaches protecting the player?)

5.) double digit receptions 

 

 What we are missing on the team

 

1.) Separation

2.) YAC

3.) consistent catching

 

What Daboll requires:

 

1.) good route tree

2.) I am going to generalize here, but the WR needs to have a brain in his skull to read the D and change their route

 

Where I struggle is:

 

1.) a limited route tree (by far better on the outside than in,

2.) doesn't make players miss

3.) most of his success (stats) have been on downfield plays, which is not a staple of our offense. Josh as of now is a short and mid throw passer, our OL is not great and we want to get the ball out of his hands quicker. A slower WR who seems to be an outside only guy who plays better with the long ball than the short =/= what we are doing on offense. There are simply better players who fit the mold

 

Edit: forgot to mention this - Is he CJ Spiller/Sammy level clemson intelligent?

Sammy it appears is s flat earther, not that many people are that willfully ignorant, so there is hope for Tee...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Reed83HOF said:

 

With your top point on size and always open - I used to feel that way as well. I think I have evolved past that though. I need someone who can separate and catch. As McD says, I want someone who can catch the ball - we have had too many drops (higgins catches the ball). IIRC, Josh is better when he gets rid of the ball in under 2.5 seconds - so knowing what route to run based on the D (and be able to go in or out) and be open in 2.5 seconds is a skill I am looking highly at right now. In that short time frame, making a catch in tight quarters and being able to accelerate to generate YAC and make some people miss is at the top of my list for needs in a WR.

 

When I hear a WR who is big and open regardless of speartation I envision that player as the QBs best friend, a TE, which is where I like that profile a lot, someone who can be mean like Knox (when he holds on to the ball).

 

It's not that I don't like Higgins, just feel he isn't a match skill wise for what I see at least. I think he will be a solid WR in the NFL. 

This basically sums up my sentiments on the matter. I think that as a whole we should be focusing on the wideouts with QB experience, advanced route running, exceptional separation skills, and/ experience in Daboll’s system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Remember this tweet, CLEARLY the Bills have an interest. You aren’t bringing your OL coach unless there was someone you wanted him to see up close. 

Reminds me of McDermott working Ed Oliver to death on all those d line drills at his pro day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, KOKBILLS said:

 

Maybe so...I know folks like Mims more for example, and he's got pretty good height and length as well as more explosion...No doubt you will not get a consensus on Drafting Tee...Especially at #22...

 

However I do get the feeling that is exactly what the Bills are going to do...I watched him a ton last year...Seemed open a lot to me and Lawrence threw it to him regardless...I have no issues with Tee assuming they don't take him ahead of the top 3 WR's......But I fully understand those who do, and why they do...We'll just have to see...?

Tee made a lot of catches that were off the Mark where Lawrence but the ball in awkward positions or off his stride....sound familiar?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Locomark said:

Tee made a lot of catches that were off the Mark where Lawrence but the ball in awkward positions or off his stride....sound familiar?

Yes there were frequent bailouts for Trev’s inaccuracies and “yolo” (no relation) passes 

Edited by YoloinOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...