Jump to content

Was Trading a 3rd For Kelvin Benjamin in 2017 a Good or Bad Move?


Kelvin Benjamin  

138 members have voted

  1. 1. Was trading a 3rd for Kelvin Benjamin a Good or Bad Idea

    • Good
      46
    • Bad
      92


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I'm So Happy for You that you have no issues with the trade, Phil.

 

But I'm curious by what metric you feel Benjamin was the best WR on the Bills? 

In 2017, Deonte Thompson had more YPG.  Jordan Matthews had a higher catch %.  Zay Jones and Clay had more targets.

In 2018, Bob Foster and Zay Jones had more YPG.  Every other WR who saw playing time had a higher catch %, including Zay Jones and Bob Foster.  Zay Jones had more targets.

 

Look, let's not polish a turd.  McDermott and Beane's roster decisions WRT WR blew chunks their first two years, and it goes far beyond drafting Zay Jones and trading a 3rd for Benjamin.  Other teams bring in late round draft picks who are more productive.

 

Brown, Beasley, and Knox (if he LOOKS THE BALL IN and stops butter-fingering the bunnies) look like good adds.  Come up with a good tall possession receiver and I'm all in.

 


First, I’m focusing on 2017 and the moment that they made the trade.  I’ll agree it was not “good” in the sense the returns from KB didn’t equal what they gave up.  This is especially true in 2018.  When you release a player mid season that you traded so, that’s probably not a good deal.  
 

My point is that the move to make the trade was actually a good idea and it’s not as lopsided as you make it seem to be.   
 

Hap, I swear, you must work for PFF because now you are using irrelevant numbers to push narratives that doesn’t exist.  

 

Using Jordan Matthews’ catch percentage is moot because he was on IR before Benjamin even joined the team.  And he played about 4 games that season.  So huge swing and a miss there.  
 

Also bringing in Clay’s number are again irrelevant because again, we’re talking the WR position.  Not TE.  
 

I don’t think that any defensive coordinator could watch Benjamin and Thompson and honestly say that Deonte Thompson was a better receiver.  KB was better that season, had more ability, and more experience.  Don’t pretend that fans and the media didn’t think so either, because there were several articles written questioning whether he was a #1 WR.  
 

 That’s not saying much, but again his specialty was the 50/50 ball and he had a QB that didn’t throw those passes.  So again using catch % is a faulty metric given those circumstances.  
 

He did love throwing short passes to Zay Jones, especially in garbage time (and there was a lot garbage time for opposing teams), which accounts for a higher catch percentages. 

 

Also while the Bills WR’s that season didn’t scare anyone, it’s clear that most of the attention in the secondary went to Benjamin.   They doubled or out their best player on him which again effected his productivity.  
 

Foster was a rookie in 2018, and again I’m talking about the 2017 season.  
 

 Your “polishing a turd” metaphor is A. Disgusting and B. shortsighted.  You can find fault with who the team put on the field at WR but you also have to remember they were turning over the roster.  They couldn’t address every position and they knew that 2018 would be a step back.  
 

I guess you are holding it against Beane that late round picks like Austin Prohel or Ray Ray McLeod didnt pan out?  That’s just silly.  
 

Here’s my question to you - if the Bills don’t make the trade for KB, do they still win enough games to make the playoffs?  Because I don’t think they do.  

Edited by Phil The Thrill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scott7975 said:

My take is that it was a move that could have turned out good but instead turned out bad.  Its not like the guy didn't have production before coming here.


Yep I can agree that.  Going back to my original post - this is why I don’t feel the trade was the disaster some fans pretend it was 

2 hours ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said:

I was never a big fan of this signing. Every time I saw Benjamin and Croom on the field it made me sick.

So when this trade was made in October 2017 the Bills 

 

- had not gone to playoffs in 17 years

- were 5-1 for the first time in years

- went “all in “ to make the playoffs but didn’t have to deal a first or second round asset for a player with decent production and a lot of potential.

 

You’re telling me, as this time you didn’t like this move and were cool with Zay Jones, Andre Holmes, and  Deonte Thompson at WR

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, MJS said:

Not sure the two are connected in any way. Daboll hasn't produced good offenses for the Bills. Maybe there's a coordinator out there who can.

They are connected because they are both counterintuitive to winning. Not surprised you couldn't recognize that ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ArtVandalay said:

They are connected because they are both counterintuitive to winning. Not surprised you couldn't recognize that ?

Getting a better coordinator is counterintuitive to winning?

 

Let me be clear, I don't really mind sticking with Daboll myself. I'm on the fence with him. But I can definitely understand those fans who want a better offense and think Daboll is a big reason why the offense isn't humming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MJS said:

Getting a better coordinator is counterintuitive to winning?

 

Let me be clear, I don't really mind sticking with Daboll myself. I'm on the fence with him. But I can definitely understand those fans who want a better offense and think Daboll is a big reason why the offense isn't humming.

Wishing to get rid of the coordinator who has done an outstanding job developing your #7 overall QB in his 2nd season is counterintuitive to winning, yes.

 

Kelvin Benjamin was absolute trash and a waste of a draft pick. The team cut him mid-year the following year. Counterintuitive to winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He won’t be perfect But this was a major miss on a guy he should’ve known well. 
 

the 3rd isn’t huge but the cap and more importantly the opportunity cost of getting someone else hurt a bit. 
 

Not the end of the world but a minor miss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Phil The Thrill said:


Yep I can agree that.  Going back to my original post - this is why I don’t feel the trade was the disaster some fans pretend it was 

So when this trade was made in October 2017 the Bills 

 

- had not gone to playoffs in 17 years

- were 5-1 for the first time in years

- went “all in “ to make the playoffs but didn’t have to deal a first or second round asset for a player with decent production and a lot of potential.

 

You’re telling me, as this time you didn’t like this move and were cool with Zay Jones, Andre Holmes, and  Deonte Thompson at WR

I didn't like Benjamin in the draft, his size was the only thing he had going for him. He was like a TE/WR tweener, like in the mold of Croom who I also think is worthless. I was not happy with our WR's at that time but I knew Benjamin was not going to improve our WR core.

Edited by Call_Of_Ktulu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Livinginthepast said:

At the time it seemed like a mild risk for a significant reward. Nobody could have foreseen how useless Benjamin was and how bad his attitude seemed to be. In the end it cost us a 3rd round pick and we cut our losses on KB pretty quick.

 

For sure at the time of the trade it looked good.  After seeing him play,  it looked real bad.  If it had worked out even a little better,  the trade could have had good value to get a big bodied wr. Instead,  we got a slob of a player with a big case of the dropsies.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...