Jump to content

The Impeachment Trial of President Donald J. Trump


Nanker

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

"But they have to call new witnesses, because the House was obstructed by Trump and couldn't hear from these witnesses!"

 

That'll be the excuse.

i'd tell 'im that the House should have filed with the court to get resolution. in fact, they still have that opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
-zEWdbBz_reasonably_small.jpg
 
 
 
 
 
Dershowitz and many Rs have tried to conflate maladministration and abuse of power. The Framers rejected maladministration—being ineffective or inefficient—as grounds for impeachment. In contrast, they saw abuse of power as central to the meaning of high crimes and misdemeanors.
2:20 PM · Dec 16, 2019·Twitter for iPhone
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
 
 
-zEWdbBz_reasonably_small.jpg
 
 
 
 
 
Dershowitz and many Rs have tried to conflate maladministration and abuse of power. The Framers rejected maladministration—being ineffective or inefficient—as grounds for impeachment. In contrast, they saw abuse of power as central to the meaning of high crimes and misdemeanors.
2:20 PM · Dec 16, 2019·Twitter for iPhone

 

...Alan Dershowitz included in a sentence citing "and many Republicans"?.....He's been a Dem supporting lib from day one, yet it is quite interesting to see his assessments of this mess as an anti-impeachment advocate, etc......how come?........Tibs nausea?..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...Alan Dershowitz included in a sentence citing "and many Republicans"?.....He's been a Dem supporting lib from day one, yet it is quite interesting to see his assessments of this mess as an anti-impeachment advocate, etc......how come?........Tibs nausea?..........

 

Alan is a very useful tool for the side that's writing his fee cheque

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/15/2019 at 2:41 PM, row_33 said:

Never understood why the coyote felt riding on the rocket was a good move

 

at best there was going to be that sudden stop at the end of the ride 

 

 

Well ol  Slim didn't seem to care:

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Rudy G, at the very least, should be called to testify. Barr, too, he was in on this. All this screaming about this not being fair? Well, stop hiding the truth, let these clowns testify. 

 

 

You want the Attorney General to testify to the Senate about why he’s doing his job? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Rudy G, at the very least, should be called to testify. Barr, too, he was in on this. All this screaming about this not being fair? Well, stop hiding the truth, let these clowns testify. 

 

 

 

Why? What useful information would they be able to provide? I thought the only acceptable witnesses were those who could give speculation about third-hand hearsay accounts based on their feelz.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so... if i understand this correctly, ***** u schumer wants to call his witnesses  but doesn't want Repubs to call any witnesses. in what god forsaken reality do these dimwits reside? i say let both sides call whatever witnesses they want and let the cards fall where they may. let the truth out or at least let any and all questions thereof, that might be the truth out so it can be examined in the light. what are the Dems afraid of? lets make this whole thing into an examination of all things 2016 related so we can once and for all put it behind us and move forward with correcting the wrongs.

 

Schumer says he wants impeachment trial focused on facts, not 'conspiracy theories,' as he balks at GOP calling witnesses

Edited by Foxx
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously, the founding fathers would have sided with the Democrats in this. They were against allowing foreign influence in our elections and the stone walking and obstruction by a branch of government. Trump has to turn over documents and allow witnesses to testify, and the Senate or Judge Roberts need to uphold their oath to the constitution 

 

Trump is is against a republican form of government, checks and balances, our security forces and the rule of law 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...