Jump to content

McDermott Weds Presser: Sullivan asks whether Allen is an improvement over Tyrod


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, GG said:

 

No matter how much disdain you show for what the average fan sees, at the end of the day, bad players can't outrun their critics.    The conversations surrounding Allen are very similar to EJ, who also had a promising start.

 

When Allen can show that he can read a defense and defeat a blitz, then the converstations will end.

Genuine question: how football smart do people think Allen is? Has he developed his reading of defenses? 

Edited by london_bills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, FUTURIST said:

Jerry Sullivan is a narcissist.  Guy has always tried to make everything about him instead of the Bills.  Always asks stupid questions for attention.

I know what you are saying. Mike schopp too? 

 

I do think there needs to be people who will be somewhat 'provocative' in their opinions and they are entitled to them. 

 

I get more frustrated listening to John Murphy personally than schopp or Sullivan. I don't always want a positive spin put on bills talk. 

Edited by london_bills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Royale with Cheese said:

It's a combination of the questions and I think he's still pissed about the Cleveland game.  
He's not happy with the run defense, he's not happy with the lack of scoring on offense.  

He hired his second offensive coordinator- he and Beane moved up for JA. I am not saying McD is a bad coach but he gets some of the blame. He isn’t used to the media around these parts getting on him- imagine if he was in Philly with this ***** show?

Edited by billsfan_34
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoBills808 said:

But stats!


It has nothing to do with the stats for me. I think it’s fine to make comparisons.
 

It’s just the fact that he even bothered to ask the question knowing how McD speaks to the media. He just wanted to make a point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Josh Allens numbers are simiilar to Drew Brees's numbers at the beginning of his career. 

 

I guess reporters are to ask deuchy questions but the answer is obvious to the whole world.  No its not good enough.

 

I will say this, Tyrod was declining over his last 20 while Josh has been rising.  We need a lot more improvment or he will be just another in the long list of QB;s who did not make it here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bangarang said:


It has nothing to do with the stats for me. I think it’s fine to make comparisons.
 

It’s just the fact that he even bothered to ask the question knowing how McD speaks to the media. He just wanted to make a point.

Mcdermott generally deals with stuff like that quite well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, london_bills said:

Genuine question: how football smart to people think Allen is? Has he developed his reading of defenses? 

 

It depends if you ask people inside the 716 area code or outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GG said:

...let's just leave aside the fact that you lumped the two years together without looking at how they improved (or didn't), respectively. Because who has time for all that context nonsense.

 

Does the fact that in 9 less games Young threw ELEVEN more picks and only ONE more TD than Allen mean anything to you, at all? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

No they are not. He did not play well on Sunday. When I said it after the game you all jumped on me and countless people have come out and said it since. I didn't say bench him, or move on, or he is done. I said he played poorly on Sunday and he needs to play better. 

 

Allen needs to play better than he played on Sunday, but to compare how he played to Tyrod's play is IMO (having watched Sunday's film, and watched Tyrod) mistaken.

 

Allen did a lot of things on Sunday that I never saw Tyrod do. 

 

Allen also didn't do some things Sunday that he needs to do.

 

He also had passes hit guys in the hands and get dropped or knocked away, and that has to change too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a reason a lot of fantasy football leagues draft QB's much later then they used to. They realized there isn't much of a difference week to week between the 4th best QB, and the 15th best QB. I only bring up fantasy because we are talking about Stats. Decision making, and completing drives when it matters, is the difference between good QBs and bad QBs. Allen is still a work in progress, and he needs at least the full 2020 season before you start thinking its never going to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a Taylor fan.  Specifically a Taylor fan in Roman/Lynn's offense.  The complete inability to keep pass catchers around Taylor was the biggest hindrance to his time here.  This defense and Taylor and that offense would be a pretty good combination.  All that said bringing in Dennison was the nail in the coffin.  Daboll is definitely a step up from Dennison and I really feel like the OL and Allen's growing pains are fixable problems.  The one thing Taylor didn't bring enough of that Allen seems to already have is that "clutch" factor.  There's no real stat for it.  Allen just seems to make his best and biggest plays late in games.  Even the Cleveland game he made plays that could and should have won that game.  I think that mixed with his physical talent make him good.  Give him enough time with (hopefully) one offense (I'm alright with Daboll) and I think Allen can be the QB we thought we were drafting.

 

ps I love it when people argue pass catchers not helping Allen like the guys we have now are not miles better than the guys Taylor threw to with Dennison here.

Edited by Maine-iac
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...