AKC Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 (edited) With a high snap yesterday that "pass" was up in McKenzie's faceguard. Since we pull the OC on those a defender sitting on the play could fire through the A gaps and knock the ball up for grabs. We seem to have a little more air on our exchange than I see with KC for instance. Probably be a good idea to start working to reduce the arc on that since it's clearly an ongoing weapon and stage setter for other plays. Edited October 7, 2019 by AKC 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Billieve Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 You're worried that's a pass that will get picked off? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 I like there being some space there that way the refs can't ***** us and call it a fumble again. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fansince88 Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 Well, if it is just you and me....yes you are the only one 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat68 Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 6 minutes ago, AKC said: With a high snap yesterday that "pass" was up in McKenzie's faceguard. Since we pull the OC on those a defender sitting on the play could fire through the A gaps and knock the ball up for grabs. We seem to have a little more air on our exchange than I see with KC for instance. Probably be a good idea to start working to reduce the arc on that since it's clearly an ongoing weapon and stage setter for other plays. You dont understand why it's done that way. It's a shovel pass. If it is dropped it's an incomplete pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalScotts Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 yes...im only concerned when it doesnt work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 I think so yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plano Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 I didn't get a chance to see him play, I was too busy WINNING! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUSE Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 (edited) YEP, YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE . AND YOU WIN..... A NEW CAR!!! 634 × Edited October 7, 2019 by HOUSE 2 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vorpma Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 Yes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InLondon Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 Others have said it, but yes this is the way the play is designed. If you put too much velocity the receiver has a smaller window for reaction and positioning. The idea is he runs "onto" the ball. The 2nd problem with velocity at close quarters is the pass bouncing off the hands or shoulder-pad of the receiver. The danger of a lineman intercepting when they are not looking for a pass in that range, and to be honest, are probably not as good at catching balls as a wide receiver, is slim. So I think it is a play that looks more dangerous then it is. And look, not to be glib, it did go for a lot of yards. I am more concerned with another play of ours called the "mad scramble and throw off the front-foot into a crowd play." I think the opposition has seen it enough now. Let's take it out of the play book. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyjj Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 Am I the only one uncomfortable with the hang time on our Jet Sweep exchange? By AKC, 32 minutes ago in The Stadium Wall Apparently so. In the spirit of full disclosure, I have consternation over the RPMs on our long snapper's punt snaps! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaninSarasota Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 After a lot of careful consideration, yes, you are the one uncomfortable with this phenomenon ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 16 minutes ago, freddyjj said: Am I the only one uncomfortable with the hang time on our Jet Sweep exchange? By AKC, 32 minutes ago in The Stadium Wall Apparently so. In the spirit of full disclosure, I have consternation over the RPMs on our long snapper's punt snaps! ? Honestly the snap against to bojo against the pats didn't have enough rpm. Ferguson is too inconsistent apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 Yes. Yes you are. Congratulations (?)? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan1959 Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 Well, I guess it is a little concerning when the hang time on the Jet Sweep exchange is greater than the hangtime on our punts... 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 57 minutes ago, fansince88 said: Well, if it is just you and me....yes you are the only one Lmao...for sure...its the safest play they run... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real McClappy Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 Only Sweep that concerns me. Kobra Kai!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 Why yes, yes you are. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freddie's Dead Posted October 7, 2019 Share Posted October 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Warcodered said: I like there being some space there that way the refs can't ***** us and call it a fumble again. This ^^^^ We have to clearly make it a forward pass so we don't get colonoscopized again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts