Jump to content

TNF 8:20pm : Eagles (1-2) @ Packers (3-0)


whatdrought

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

That's because they're subjective comments. He's giving the benefit of the doubt to the reports and saying, if someone on his team see's him that way or interprets him that way, he's not going to stomp on their perspective, but rather, he's going to be responsible for who he is. Of course he can be a better teammate. Everyone can be better at everything. 

 

As for the dinner, I still don't see how it's directly related, and even then it could be as I said before- him being sure that everything is good. Not proof that he's repenting from anything. 

 

I just don't see it. I also don't understand your last sentence above. :P

 

 

LOL typo.

 

Anyway, as you know say, the comments were likely made.

 

 

 

1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

K ...  WEO your position on this topic is clear.

 

try and enjoy the game. Mmmk? 

Who is Hyoun..  and why can’t it be me? 

 

 

I got this new MacBook and the keyboard is a mess.  Or maybe its the jack and cokes

Edited by Mr. WEO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

LOL typo.

 

Anyway, as you know say, the comments were likely made.

 

I figured.

 

No. I'm not saying that. Not at all. I'm saying that he isn't going to assume that they weren't. He isn't going to defend himself. He isn't going to say "Nah bro, I'm a great teammate. I'm the best damn teammate anyone's ever seen." If he did that he would be a d-bag, as you called him. Instead he said "I know I have room to grow as a human, so I'm not going to defend myself if there are people that feel that way- instead, I'm going to seek to improve myself." 

 

Then, his teammates, and a billion other people with inside information, did defend him and said directly that there was absolutely no ground for the comments. So I'm confident saying they either didn't happen, or that they were vendetta based and don't specifically speak to him as a person. 

 

Anyways- you're fighting with everyone tonight, as is the norm for you. ;) But if you're basing your "he's a d-bag" comment on this one situation, I think you're incredibly wrong. 

Edited by whatdrought
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, Aaron Rodgers just had good back to back drives stall for FGS around the red zone.

 

The Pack have completely dominated the game except special teams. Should be up 21-7 or 17-7.

 

Remember that the next time we see someone b!tch about the Bills dominating a game but the score not showing it, or a drive stalling and blaming Allen.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

I figured.

 

No. I'm not saying that. Not at all. I'm saying that he isn't going to assume that they weren't. He isn't going to defend himself. He isn't going to say "Nah bro, I'm a great teammate. I'm the best damn teammate anyone's ever seen." If he did that he would be a d-bag, as you called him. Instead he said "I know I have room to grow as a human, so I'm not going to defend myself if there are people that feel that way- instead, I'm going to seek to improve myself." 

 

Then, his teammates, and a billion other people with inside information, did defend him and said directly that there was absolutely no ground for the comments. So I'm confident saying they either didn't happen, or that they were vendetta based and don't specifically speak to him as a person. 

 

Anyways- you're fighting with everyone tonight, as is the norm for you. ;) But if you're basing your "he's a d-bag" comment on this one situation, I think you're incredibly wrong. 

 

You are denying these things were said, he isn't.  Now you say if they WERE said, it's because of a "vendetta" one of his teammates has against him?  That's something you just fabricated.

 

And his supportive team mates didn't deny that six other players made the comments....they were disagreeing with the comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:

Just get rid of replay altogether. No reviews, no fan replay, just live and die by the moment, and hope the refs get it right

 

 

This play's the perfect example of how bad it is.  It may or may not have been a fumble, but don't call it and let them play it like a fumble, because if they play it like a fumble and it's not a fumble, they can bring it back, but if they play it like it's not a fumble and it is a fumble, Green Bay gets screwed.  

 

The only thing that could make it worse is if they introduced the old "in the grasp" rule.  Imagine what a ***** show that would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

Two guys get bashed in the head at the beginning of the game and no call, but some kind of goofy offensive pass interference 2 yards from the LOS gets a flag. Makes no sense.

Yeah I didn't like how this game started with the helmet to helmet hits, and there was a lot of face mask grabbing too. Some of that was called, and some wasn't

 

It's inconsistent and the priorities are out of whack.

 

Godell needs to go IMO.

Edited by RocCityRoller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...