Buffalo_Gal Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 7 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: I was just busting your balls because normally your posts are really good and you don't make mistakes like that. With that said, you need to edit that post again. Busting my balls? Er, that would be impossible. I am almost afraid to look at what I didn't correct... meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: You wonder how he will defend this critical state. “A majority of Pennsylvania voters — 57% — support the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, though his supporters in the state back his claim that it’s a partisan ‘witch hunt.’ . . . Just 37% say Trump deserves reelection while 59% say it is time for a change. A majority, 54%, say Trump has done a ‘poor job’ as president.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: You wonder how he will defend this critical state. “A majority of Pennsylvania voters — 57% — support the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, though his supporters in the state back his claim that it’s a partisan ‘witch hunt.’ . . . Just 37% say Trump deserves reelection while 59% say it is time for a change. A majority, 54%, say Trump has done a ‘poor job’ as president.” You still believe the polling I see. Good luck with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, dubs said: You still believe the polling I see. Good luck with that. it's almost as if he learned absolutely nothing from 2016. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 Just now, Foxx said: it's almost as if he learned absolutely nothing from 2016. learned nothing since ever 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 1, 2019 Author Share Posted November 1, 2019 4 minutes ago, dubs said: You still believe the polling I see. Good luck with that. Yes, they are relatively accurate Just now, Foxx said: it's almost as if he learned absolutely nothing from 2016. What was suppose to learn? How accurate they were? They pretty munched nailed it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 51 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Extortion and bribery are crimes Which is exactly why the activities of Biden and others in Ukraine should be examined. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Чему можно было научиться? Насколько они были точны? Они довольно жевал прибил его 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 Does anyone else find it sad that it’s apparently now a crime to NOT give away your tax dollars to foreign countries? Only in America! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 1, 2019 Author Share Posted November 1, 2019 4 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: Which is exactly why the activities of Biden and others in Ukraine should be examined. Legally. No excuse for Trumps gross abuse of power and law breaking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 8 hours ago, Pilsner said: You are either truly delusional or are a paid troll. Paid troll. When he's not earning nickels posting stuff in comment sections of online publications, he earns a few extra nickels posting stuff at a website he frequents because he's a BIlls fan. Toss him on ignore. It's the textbook example of 'addition by subtraction.' 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Legally. No excuse for Trumps gross abuse of power and law breaking. Sweet! Which means the very moment Joe’s sworn in we can start the impeachment for his extortion and bribery of a foreign country for his personal gain while he was Vice President. Something to look forward to. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 There is almost no chance the Democrats are successful in their attempt to overthrow this administration via impeachment. Next to zero. After reading Peggy Noonan’s OpEd in the Journal (or as Michael Scott calls it, The Wall), it’s painfully obvious how out of touch and broke the media is. They still act as if the people don’t have access to information outside of them. It’s truly amazing actually. Do they really expect the American people to read a transcript, see that there is nothing in there, and change their minds because democrats, the legacy media, and partisan leaks tell them they don’t know what they read? I can’t wait until this blows up in all of their faces and Trump wins in a Regan landslide in 2020. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 8 minutes ago, dubs said: There is almost no chance the Democrats are successful in their attempt to overthrow this administration via impeachment. Next to zero. After reading Peggy Noonan’s OpEd in the Journal (or as Michael Scott calls it, The Wall), it’s painfully obvious how out of touch and broke the media is. They still act as if the people don’t have access to information outside of them. It’s truly amazing actually. Do they really expect the American people to read a transcript, see that there is nothing in there, and change their minds because democrats, the legacy media, and partisan leaks tell them they don’t know what they read? I can’t wait until this blows up in all of their faces and Trump wins in a Regan landslide in 2020. Their rationale is pretty basic. Since day 1 paint Trump as unstable and dangerous to the Republic. Continue to roll out allegations that keep painting him in that light. Use media supplicants to control the narrative. When Trump & DOJ fight back, drown it out with noise and charges of political retribution. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 20 minutes ago, dubs said: There is almost no chance the Democrats are successful in their attempt to overthrow this administration via impeachment. Next to zero. After reading Peggy Noonan’s OpEd in the Journal (or as Michael Scott calls it, The Wall), it’s painfully obvious how out of touch and broke the media is. They still act as if the people don’t have access to information outside of them. It’s truly amazing actually. Do they really expect the American people to read a transcript, see that there is nothing in there, and change their minds because democrats, the legacy media, and partisan leaks tell them they don’t know what they read? I can’t wait until this blows up in all of their faces and Trump wins in a Regan landslide in 2020. it's higher than zero, getting enough voters to turn on him in 2020 will be a major victory Peggy is still glorifying in the days she wrote speeches for Reagan.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 “TESTIMONY:” John Lucas: Alex Vindman’s Impeachment Testimony Completely Rested On His Personal Opinions. “Alex Vindman’s testimony about the July 25 call between the two presidents does not add any new facts. So, what does he say? He offers his opinions about the wisdom of the call. That’s it.” . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 1, 2019 Author Share Posted November 1, 2019 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: Sweet! Which means the very moment Joe’s sworn in we can start the impeachment for his extortion and bribery of a foreign country for his personal gain while he was Vice President. Something to look forward to. Too bad you won't have the wealth of witnesses, documents and any evidence, but hey, that's never stopped the GOP clown car from going forward with investigations before. It's really nice to have the facts and truth on your side. You guys literally have no idea how that feels Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 1, 2019 Author Share Posted November 1, 2019 27 minutes ago, B-Man said: “TESTIMONY:” John Lucas: Alex Vindman’s Impeachment Testimony Completely Rested On His Personal Opinions. “Alex Vindman’s testimony about the July 25 call between the two presidents does not add any new facts. So, what does he say? He offers his opinions about the wisdom of the call. That’s it.” . Oh, and his witnessing of the shakedown and all...details Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 Regarding the reading of the transcripts in a “fireside” chat? Puppet....he really needs to use a puppet. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 20 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Too bad you won't have the wealth of witnesses, documents and any evidence, but hey, that's never stopped the GOP clown car from going forward with investigations before. It's really nice to have the facts and truth on your side. You guys literally have no idea how that feels 'We' have better than witnesses. We have your soon-to-be President on video tape bragging about committing this so-called crime while holding a government office. My suggestion? Pick someone you really, really like for the VP nomination because Uncle Joe will have to be impeached on his second day in office. It'll rival William Henry Harrison for the shortest time in office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 1 hour ago, IDBillzFan said: Paid troll. When he's not earning nickels posting stuff in comment sections of online publications, he earns a few extra nickels posting stuff at a website he frequents because he's a BIlls fan. Way overpaid, he's not that good. he's a BIlls fan. Is he really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 1, 2019 Author Share Posted November 1, 2019 7 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: 'We' have better than witnesses. We have your soon-to-be President on video tape bragging about committing this so-called crime while holding a government office. My suggestion? Pick someone you really, really like for the VP nomination because Uncle Joe will have to be impeached on his second day in office. It'll rival William Henry Harrison for the shortest time in office. Bragging about FIGHTING corrupt, ya, that will sure get him impeached. Thanks for for arguing the facts, though. Better than swatting down these silly conspiracy theories Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 Whistleblower’s Attorneys Make a Desperate and Pathetic Attempt to Silence the Free Press and a Free People https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2019/11/01/whistleblowers-attorneys-make-desperate-pathetic-attempt-silence-free-press-free-people/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 too bad this wasn't prior to the internet era back in those Dark Ages the 3 networks and 3 papers of record could make up whatever they wanted to with zero point zero oversight or rebuttal 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 22 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Bragging about FIGHTING corrupt, ya, that will sure get him impeached. Thanks for for arguing the facts, though. Better than swatting down these silly conspiracy theories Has anyone ever told you that you perceive your world with a stunning lack of logic and self awareness? It may just be your best quality....beyond your Hollywood-like good looks I'm assuming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 If Ciaramella is the Whistleblower, Democrats Have Made a Major Blunder and Their Credibility Will Evaporate https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2019/10/31/ciaramella-whistleblower-democrats-made-major-blunder-credibility-will-evaporate/ . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 1, 2019 Author Share Posted November 1, 2019 5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Has anyone ever told you that you perceive your world with a stunning lack of logic and self awareness? It may just be your best quality....beyond your Hollywood-like good looks I'm assuming. You are completely projecting. Stunning lack of self awareness on your part. Cultists are like that 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: If Ciaramella is the Whistleblower, Democrats Have Made a Major Blunder and Their Credibility Will Evaporate https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2019/10/31/ciaramella-whistleblower-democrats-made-major-blunder-credibility-will-evaporate/ . But everything the WB said has proved to be 100% correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: If Ciaramella is the Whistleblower, Democrats Have Made a Major Blunder and Their Credibility Will Evaporate https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2019/10/31/ciaramella-whistleblower-democrats-made-major-blunder-credibility-will-evaporate/ . He is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: He is. I don't know Ciaramella from Tibs, but if he truly is one of those embedded DC nutsuckers, you have to imagine he also has the intelligence of Tibs because you have to be one dumb effin' moron to willingly become a whistle-blower in DC when you KNOW the fate of virtually every whistle-blower in DC. The dude's life will be over in short order. If he doesn't suffer a double-tap Arkancide, he will surely be bankrupt and lonely in some crappy apartment in BFE where he'll be a schittstain footnote to this far-left schittshow. 49 minutes ago, Gary M said: Way overpaid, he's not that good. he's a BIlls fan. Is he really? Yeah, I don't think you find your way to TBD for its political discussion. He has a couple of usernames because he has gotten them confused and posted political stuff here under his TBD username, but wasn't smart enough to delete it before he signed out, signed back in as Tibs, and posted the exact same comment. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 Just now, IDBillzFan said: I don't know Ciaramella from Tibs, but if he truly is one of those embedded DC nutsuckers, you have to imagine he also has the intelligence of Tibs because you have to be one dumb effin' moron to willingly become a whistle-blower in DC when you KNOW the fate of virtually every whistle-blower in DC. The dude's life will be over in short order. If he doesn't suffer a double-tap Arkancide, he will surely be bankrupt and lonely in some crappy apartment in BFE where he'll be a schittstain footnote to this far-left schittshow. His judgment is even worse than you think. He's a CIA officer (not clandestine) who was known prior to this to be "over the top Never Trumper" by staffers on the Hill who I know personally. Literally, he wore his partisanship on his shoulder like a badge of honor -- worked for Biden, frequently met with Schiff (which alone isn't anything bad since Schiff is intel -- but he never would meet with the other side). This well known in DC, including in the media. That's how bad of a spook he is. And why Schiff is running from him now. He knows he can't spin his involvement to anyone in DC, including the press who WANTS to help him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 Democrats relying on 2nd/3rd/4th hand hearsay to connect dots not actually connected. This Soviet style show trial’s theme song should be the @kcreospeedwagon song “Take It on the Run” Heard it from a friend who Heard it from a friend who Heard it from another ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 4 hours ago, Chef Jim said: Why people even pay attention to polls these days is beyond me. Especially when they're consistently being caught oversampling Democrats. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 44 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are completely projecting. Stunning lack of self awareness on your part. Cultists are like that But everything the WB said has proved to be 100% correct upps... sorry, don't mean to harsh your narrative. https://twitter.com/ArdenFarhi/status/1189948192986714118 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 4 hours ago, Chef Jim said: Why people even pay attention to polls these days is beyond me. it's the only hope they have in life that someone is going to magically show up and change their miserable life into heaven on earth 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 Considering his background, if Ciaramella is in fact the guy, then he’s a confidential informant, not a “whistleblower.” Schiff is calling him a whistleblower because it’s harder for GOP members to treat one of them as a hostile witness and question motives than it is a CI. CBS News has learned NSC's Senior Director for European Affairs Tim Morrison was on the Trump-Zelensky call and told the investigating committees, "I want to be clear, I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed." cc @MajorCBS Morrison also testified that the memorandum of the call released by the White House is accurate to his recollection and he does not know the WB's identity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 1, 2019 Author Share Posted November 1, 2019 21 minutes ago, Foxx said: upps... sorry, don't mean to harsh your narrative. https://twitter.com/ArdenFarhi/status/1189948192986714118 Lol, even though he wanted the full transcript hidden away (cover up)? Even though he backed up what everyone else said. Hes great, he's willing to say how and when everything happened, so there is no disputing the facts. He just thinks withholding the aid in exchange for getting the Ukrainians to help Trumps election prospects was no big deal. Vindman, Ambassadors, the inspector general, and others (John Bolton) thought very much otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 56 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: He's a CIA officer (not clandestine) who was known prior to this to be "over the top Never Trumper" by staffers on the Hill who I know personally. Literally, he wore his partisanship on his shoulder like a badge of honor -- worked for Biden, frequently met with Schiff (which alone isn't anything bad since Schiff is intel -- but he never would meet with the other side). Does this type of connection shield him from the impending banishment and financial bankruptcy that follows all whistle-blowers? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said: Does this type of connection shield him from the impending banishment and financial bankruptcy that follows all whistle-blowers? The Agency protects its own -- for the most part. But I'd think not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts