Jump to content

SI Predicts 2019 Records


Recommended Posts

On 7/19/2019 at 11:23 AM, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

"This roster needs to be seriously overhauled"...........said no one when Rex was fired.

 

McBeane created that narrative from scratch..........much to the delight of SB contending teams all around the NFL.:thumbsup:

 

Same with the salary cap nonsense..........Beane in an interview the other day said that he "warned" The Pegs it would take "2-3 years" to clean up the salary cap "mess".........and then patted himself on the back for getting it done in just 2.?    The guy created the LARGEST AMOUNT OF DEAD MONEY by one team in one offseason in NFL history!...........OF COURSE he totally re-set the Bills cap in 2 offseasons.:doh:   Hilarious.  :lol:   

 

The Bills salary cap issues were relatively minor........they still had average money to spend in FA and they always figured to have plenty of extra cap space in 2019-2020 when the old men McCoy/Wood/Clay type contracts would surely all be off the books.   But somehow ended up having to replace all of Nix and Whaley's remaining top picks(except Shaq!) AND doubled down on Wood and McCoy and lost. 

 

 

I hope these guys make it but if not expect a lot more of that kind of manipulating of the truth from McBeane as they try to buy more time to learn from their mistakes.

But McBeane does make the draft fun ! It's the autumn where all hope ends, again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/18/2019 at 7:22 PM, LSHMEAB said:

That's exactly where I'm at. His FA acquisitions have not been good. Period. I get it. They chose to rebuild. But I expect to see serious progress this season. He's made a clear and distinct footprint on this team, so it's his now. If the FA acquisitions pan out and Allen/Edmunds progress, there's reason for optimism. If not, I'll probably lose faith in the process. But that's just me. I need to see it THIS season.

Revisionism is a "heck" of a drug. Results in 2019 should be EXPECTED. 

I expect Allen to improve. I am more worried about Edmunds. If his play regresses and he gets caught up in a situational need, he may be groomed for the outside.

Edited by Rocket94
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rocket94 said:

I expect Allen to improve. I am more worried about Edmunds. If his play regresses and he gets caught up in a situational need, he may be groomed for the outside.

Also concerned with Edmunds, but I don't think it would take much grooming time if it doesn't work out at MLB. His only issue is recognition and excellence in this category is not critical at OLB. He'd be an All Pro OLB IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LSHMEAB said:

Also concerned with Edmunds, but I don't think it would take much grooming time if it doesn't work out at MLB. His only issue is recognition and excellence in this category is not critical at OLB. He'd be an All Pro OLB IMO.

I agree (what do I know) but after last season's showing, I would get him on the outside now. I don't know if his recognition skills are inherently lacking, or will game experience help him as it should. Yeah...I believe that he would be a force on the outside.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

Also concerned with Edmunds, but I don't think it would take much grooming time if it doesn't work out at MLB. His only issue is recognition and excellence in this category is not critical at OLB. He'd be an All Pro OLB IMO.

Also. I know that we have discussed Joseph several times before, but I often think of him. I know from watching him that he possesses Pro Bowl talent. I hope the heck that he gets it and matures. Being instinctual and cerebral play a big part...can he follow assignments and stay in position. 

Edited by Rocket94
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/19/2019 at 2:23 PM, BADOLBILZ said:

"This roster needs to be seriously overhauled"...........said no one when Rex was fired.

 

McBeane created that narrative from scratch..........much to the delight of SB contending teams all around the NFL.:thumbsup:

 

Same with the salary cap nonsense..........Beane in an interview the other day said that he "warned" The Pegs it would take "2-3 years" to clean up the salary cap "mess".........and then patted himself on the back for getting it done in just 2.?    The guy created the LARGEST AMOUNT OF DEAD MONEY by one team in one offseason in NFL history!...........OF COURSE he totally re-set the Bills cap in 2 offseasons.:doh:   Hilarious.  :lol:   

 

The Bills salary cap issues were relatively minor........they still had average money to spend in FA and they always figured to have plenty of extra cap space in 2019-2020 when the old men McCoy/Wood/Clay type contracts would surely all be off the books.   But somehow ended up having to replace all of Nix and Whaley's remaining top picks(except Shaq!) AND doubled down on Wood and McCoy and lost. 

 

 

I hope these guys make it but if not expect a lot more of that kind of manipulating of the truth from McBeane as they try to buy more time to learn from their mistakes.

 

The Bills didn't have much cap space prior to the 2017 FA period ($18M) and had a bunch of FA's.  They made moves that many perceived as tanking, but they wound up making the playoffs.  Last year was a step back for several reasons, so instead of year 1 being the rebuilding year, year 2 was.  We'll see how year 3 goes after clearing tons of cap room and adding talent.

 

As for last season, the inordinate amount of dead cap was mostly the result of culture change (Dareus), an unexpected retirement (Wood) and trying to secure their QB of the future (Tyrod and Glenn).  Those 4 players accounted for almost 2/3 of the dead cap.

 

17 hours ago, MOVALLEYRANDY said:

But McBeane does make the draft fun ! It's the autumn where all hope ends, again

 

Did you think that way in autumn of 2017?

Edited by Doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s weird that some fans think a team can be built in a year.

 

Beane has a clear vision, imo.  We don’t know if it’s a successful one yet, but giving him 2 years is hardly giving too much “slack.”  

 

I like Ike the way he’s building the team.  Whaley was splashier and more top heavy.  Beane is all about building strong depth, which has clearly been a successful formula in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Rocket94 said:

Also. I know that we have discussed Joseph several times before, but I often think of him. I know from watching him that he possesses Pro Bowl talent. I hope the heck that he gets it and matures. Being instinctual and cerebral play a big part...can he follow assignments and stay in position. 

 

So, you wanna replace Edmunds in the middle with someone who hasn't played a down in the NFL yet?

 

Did I read this wrong? If not, Joseph will have to have a preseason for the record books if he is going to man the middle of the D instead of Edmunds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, njbuff said:

 

So, you wanna replace Edmunds in the middle with someone who hasn't played a down in the NFL yet?

 

Did I read this wrong? If not, Joseph will have to have a preseason for the record books if he is going to man the middle of the D instead of Edmunds.

In time Edmunds maybe moved outside. This team is still in the midst of a rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, LSHMEAB said:

Also concerned with Edmunds, but I don't think it would take much grooming time if it doesn't work out at MLB. His only issue is recognition and excellence in this category is not critical at OLB. He'd be an All Pro OLB IMO.

If moving Edmunds outside were to happen, who is ready to step up in the middle? This remains to be seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rocket94 said:

So you feel this team is set? In my opinion we need one more strong draft to fortify the roster leaving no doubt. As usual, there are a lot of question marks.

 

I think the defense is set.  ST's as well assuming Hauschka is back to form.  On offense, they rebuilt the OL and added weapons in the pass and run game and they got their QB last year.  It's up to Josh to become the franchise QB they envisioned.  Sure another off-season and draft should solidify it, but they have the pieces to be a playoff team at least this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

I think the defense is set.  ST's as well assuming Hauschka is back to form.  On offense, they rebuilt the OL and added weapons in the pass and run game and they got their QB last year.  It's up to Josh to become the franchise QB they envisioned.  Sure another off-season and draft should solidify it, but they have the pieces to be a playoff team at least this year.

Oh yeah...I like what is happening. Of course the progress of Allen is crucial, the new OL, Oliver's input and so many other factors. Allen has more weapons and I like John Brown. I am anxious to see how the defensive line performs. It is important that the Bills get off to a good start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/18/2019 at 12:20 PM, SoTier said:

 

The "more talent at O-line and WR" should make those units at least NFL-caliber in 2019.  That doesn't mean they'll be good or even average, just that they won't be nearly as poor as they were last season because for the most part, the Bills didn't sign top caliber OLers or WRs.   Moreover, there's no guarantee that Allen improves enough to make him a competent QB.  Trent Edwards was a well spoken, respectful hard working bust.  So was Nathan Peterman (which is really hard for a fifth rounder, but the Bills tried to make him into something he couldn't be and he failed, ergo, a bust).

 

Also, don't forget that the Bills opponents also added talent to their rosters, some significantly.

 

 

Why don’t you finally just have the stones to admit you want the Bills to lose so you can crow about it on a message board?

Some of his predictions are puzzling (like the Jets; Gase is a good HC??) but all meaningless.  No reason to get worked up about it.

Edited by oldmanfan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Doc said:

 

The Bills didn't have much cap space prior to the 2017 FA period ($18M) and had a bunch of FA's.  They made moves that many perceived as tanking, but they wound up making the playoffs.  Last year was a step back for several reasons, so instead of year 1 being the rebuilding year, year 2 was.  We'll see how year 3 goes after clearing tons of cap room and adding talent.

 

As for last season, the inordinate amount of dead cap was mostly the result of culture change (Dareus), an unexpected retirement (Wood) and trying to secure their QB of the future (Tyrod and Glenn).  Those 4 players accounted for almost 2/3 of the dead cap.

 

 

Did you think that way in autumn of 2017?

 

 

In the 2017 offseason I was promoting the fact that they had a lot of older players on soon-expiring contracts and few large commitments down the road and would be able to retain anyone of their young core that they needed to.     It's not hard.......the cap is malleable if you have lot's of space down the road.........which they ALWAYS had.    

 

They chose to play "cash to the cap" because it suited the narrative that the roster needed to be dissected.    Donahoe did something similar...........he took advantage of the cap chaos to unnecessarily cut Ted Washington because he didn't fit GW's defense.    Then *miraculously* he had saved the Bills from their cap crisis and was back shopping in free agency the following offseason.:rolleyes:   

 

If their jobs were on the line you could rest assured they would have been front loading deals to keep the roster from being depleted as it transitioned and the core of prime age players was getting paid.  

 

They inherited a talented but poorly coached roster that was ready to be a 10-11 win team by sheer force of talent.........they CHOSE to reset and clear the decks of the prime age talent so that they would have 3-5 years instead of being judged in 1-2 years like any coach/GM combo would be in a situation where they inherited talent and expectations.    You could argue that they didn't have the QB to lead them to a SB but having a perennial "divisional round ceiling" didn't stop KC and Houston from getting their franchise QB's of the future.  

 

And btw...........the dead money from Wood was due to an unnecessary extension that Beane gave him.     His deal was set to expire.   That was poorly played.   He wasn't going anywhere in FA.     And the Dareus dead money PLUS the "walking dead" money that they gave Star Lotulelei only massively compounded the stupid money spent on the DT1T position.    But the thing was that they were going to have TONS of cap room in 2019 and beyond all along.    Even if they kept Gilmore and Woods and Dareus and picked up Watkins option etc..  

 

And the way they've spent their money to this point is very dubious.   18 UFA's this offseason........many with concerning past health issues.   Hopefully it works out but the 2018 UFA class was basically an 0-9 in terms of return on investment.    There have been no Tyrod from Ravens or Lorax or Zach Brown type value signings since Beane arrived.  

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/17/2019 at 3:06 PM, RoyBatty is alive said:

Has the Jets at 9-7, after a 4 win 2018, wowzer, Adam Gase for coach of the year.

 

I really don't get the gase love going around. He's done nothing without Peyton Manning at QB and running the offense. He was a loser in Miami, disliked by player and staff alike, and the numbers are against him in being a HC going to another team immediately (it's not gone well for other coaches who don't take time off/another position). 

 

They have no receivers (worse off than the Bills even) and the tight end who showed some promise last season is suspended for 4 games. Their offensive line looks grim, but hey they have Bell...I guess?

 

On top of that, Gregg William's defense have ranked poorly since the mid 2000s and worse since his return to football. Their secondary outside of Adams is a disaster. Their d-line is questionable and seems to be hoping that Q williams can carry the whole thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

I really don't get the gase love going around. He's done nothing without Peyton Manning at QB and running the offense. He was a loser in Miami, disliked by player and staff alike, and the numbers are against him in being a HC going to another team immediately (it's not gone well for other coaches who don't take time off/another position). 

 

They have no receivers (worse off than the Bills even) and the tight end who showed some promise last season is suspended for 4 games. Their offensive line looks grim, but hey they have Bell...I guess?

 

On top of that, Gregg William's defense have ranked poorly since the mid 2000s and worse since his return to football. Their secondary outside of Adams is a disaster. Their d-line is questionable and seems to be hoping that Q williams can carry the whole thing. 

Gase has a higher winning % than SM.  And I think the people who “defend” Gase are just doing it because people keep saying how terrible he is.  If he connects with Darnold (his qbs besides Peyton have been terrible), the Jets could be a solid team. They also have elite players on each level of their defense.  I think the Jets and the Bills are dead even and whatever qb shows the most growth will make the leap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Gase has a higher winning % than SM.  And I think the people who “defend” Gase are just doing it because people keep saying how terrible he is.  If he connects with Darnold (his qbs besides Peyton have been terrible), the Jets could be a solid team. They also have elite players on each level of their defense.  I think the Jets and the Bills are dead even and whatever qb shows the most growth will make the leap.

Yeah, the Jets and Bills look very similar and the opener will tell us a lot.  I give the Bills the edge because I like Allen and Mc Dermott a lot more than Gase and Darnold.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

In the 2017 offseason I was promoting the fact that they had a lot of older players on soon-expiring contracts and few large commitments down the road and would be able to retain anyone of their young core that they needed to.     It's not hard.......the cap is malleable if you have lot's of space down the road.........which they ALWAYS had.    

 

They chose to play "cash to the cap" because it suited the narrative that the roster needed to be dissected.    Donahoe did something similar...........he took advantage of the cap chaos to unnecessarily cut Ted Washington because he didn't fit GW's defense.    Then *miraculously* he had saved the Bills from their cap crisis and was back shopping in free agency the following offseason.:rolleyes:   

 

If their jobs were on the line you could rest assured they would have been front loading deals to keep the roster from being depleted as it transitioned and the core of prime age players was getting paid.  

 

They inherited a talented but poorly coached roster that was ready to be a 10-11 win team by sheer force of talent.........they CHOSE to reset and clear the decks of the prime age talent so that they would have 3-5 years instead of being judged in 1-2 years like any coach/GM combo would be in a situation where they inherited talent and expectations.    You could argue that they didn't have the QB to lead them to a SB but having a perennial "divisional round ceiling" didn't stop KC and Houston from getting their franchise QB's of the future.  

 

And btw...........the dead money from Wood was due to an unnecessary extension that Beane gave him.     His deal was set to expire.   That was poorly played.   He wasn't going anywhere in FA.     And the Dareus dead money PLUS the "walking dead" money that they gave Star Lotulelei only massively compounded the stupid money spent on the DT1T position.    But the thing was that they were going to have TONS of cap room in 2019 and beyond all along.    Even if they kept Gilmore and Woods and Dareus and picked up Watkins option etc..  

 

And the way they've spent their money to this point is very dubious.   18 UFA's this offseason........many with concerning past health issues.   Hopefully it works out but the 2018 UFA class was basically an 0-9 in terms of return on investment.    There have been no Tyrod from Ravens or Lorax or Zach Brown type value signings since Beane arrived.  

 

The Bills had just $18M in actual cap room prior to the 2017 FA period (cash to cap was under Ralph).  And while the cap is malleable, they made a decision not to push money down the line so that they'd have a ton available in year 3 and beyond, after they'd had a few years to reshape the roster.  Which is exactly what happened.  And again, they made the playoffs that season so...

 

The UFA's of note they lost that off-season were Gilmore, Woods, Goodwin, Brown and Robey-Coleman.  None of them were "older" and since defense hasn't been a problem, the losses of Gilmore, Brown and NRC were moot.  They also dealt Sammy.  In hindsight paying Woods $6.8M/year would have been a good move.  Would he have made a 4-5 game impact on the Bills' record last year and pushed them into the playoffs?  Doubtful, but he'd have been one less piece to have to sign this past off-season, so there's that (but I remain unconvinced that his 2018 wasn't an extreme outlier for him).  And we've beaten the Sammy thing to death and the bottom line is he hasn't come anywhere close to justifying the money he's gotten and the Bills managed to get something for him and found someone younger and cheaper in Foster to be a decoy.

 

As for value signings under Beane, he's been GM for just 2 off-seasons.  I'd consider Foster and Wallace to be "value signings."  Gaines and Kevin Johnson could very well turn out to be "value signings" this year.  We'll see.

 

And last season was mostly tanked due to the offense, and in particular the OL.  The unexpected retirement of Wood (again hindsight WRT giving him an extension and him getting injured) and psychosis of Ritchie, and also having a raw rookie QB suddenly having to start. 

Edited by Doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

The Bills had just $18M in actual cap room prior to the 2017 FA period (cash to cap was under Ralph).  And while the cap is malleable, they made a decision not to push money down the line so that they'd have a ton available in year 3 and beyond, after they'd had a few years to reshape the roster.  Which is exactly what happened.  And again, they made the playoffs that season so...

 

The UFA's of note they lost that off-season were Gilmore, Woods, Goodwin, Brown and Robey-Coleman.  None of them were "older" and since defense hasn't been a problem, the losses of Gilmore, Brown and NRC were moot.  They also dealt Sammy.  In hindsight paying Woods $6.8M/year would have been a good move.  Would he have made a 4-5 game impact on the Bills' record last year and pushed them into the playoffs?  Doubtful, but he'd have been one less piece to have to sign this past off-season, so there's that (but I remain unconvinced that his 2018 wasn't an extreme outlier for him).  And we've beaten the Sammy thing to death and the bottom line is he hasn't come anywhere close to justifying the money he's gotten and the Bills managed to get something for him and found someone younger and cheaper in Foster to be a decoy.

 

As for value signings under Beane, he's been GM for just 2 off-seasons.  I'd consider Foster and Wallace to be "value signings."  Gaines and Kevin Johnson could very well turn out to be "value signings" this year.  We'll see.

 

And last season was mostly tanked due to the offense, and in particular the OL.  The unexpected retirement of Wood (again hindsight WRT giving him an extension and him getting injured) and psychosis of Ritchie, and also having a raw rookie QB suddenly having to start. 

 

 

1) The bolded is all you need to say.   It was a choice.    They had well over $100M in uncommitted salary cap space for 2019 heading into the 2017 offseason.   They could have pushed and adjusted anything they needed to to keep long term contract guys like Gilmore and Woods and whoever.    If you need me to explain how then you haven't been paying much attention to the NFL.   Signing bonuses and amortization are nice tools but guaranteed dollars come in many malleable forms.    

 

They CHOSE not to spend then.     It was a choice.    They didn't have to stand pat in UFA or trade their existing prime young talent........but they did.    Just like they didn't have to sign Wood to an ill-fated extension or guarantee Star Lotulelei $25M+ or give Corey Coleman $3.5M for a 10 day try-out.  

 

2) The UFA's they lost were mostly prime aged players as I've said.   You think losing defensive players like Gilmore or Brown was entirely moot because the defense isn't bad............well they have since spent 3 of their 4 first round picks on defense now haven't they?    One was a boundary CB the other was a MLB.   Hmmm.   I guess you don't value draft picks but I'll take Gilmore(1st team All Pro) and Mahomes(50 TD passes 2nd most all time) over Tre White and Tre Edmunds.   So would every non-Bills NFL fan or observer.  Choices were made not forced upon them.

 

3) UFA's aren't in the pro personnel tally..........they are part of your draft work.   And as much as I like a lot of the players they have drafted it's not uncommon for drafts to look promising in the first 2-3 seasons and then fall apart.    Tre White and Matt Milano are pretty much the only McDermott draft picks we aren't still grading on a curve right now.   Zay Jones and Dion Dawkins and Tre Edmunds and Josh Allen's 2018 play won't be too appealing if repeated this year.........it will be grounds for necessary replacement.    I hope Gaines and Johnson pan out but there were talent evaluators that thought those two contracts the Bills gave two busted up vets were very generous under the circumstance...........so it could just end up being more of the same as the 2018 UFA class.    That class was 0-9.   All duds for the dollars.  Trent Murphy is the only hope for that group.   

 

    

Edited by BADOLBILZ
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

1) The bolded is all you need to say.   It was a choice.    They had well over $100M in uncommitted salary cap space for 2019 heading into the 2017 offseason.   They could have pushed and adjusted anything they needed to to keep long term contract guys like Gilmore and Woods and whoever.    If you need me to explain how then you haven't been paying much attention to the NFL.   Signing bonuses and amortization are nice tools but guaranteed dollars come in many malleable forms.    

 

They CHOSE not to spend then.     It was a choice.    They didn't have to stand pat in UFA or trade their existing prime young talent........but they did.    Just like they didn't have to sign Wood to an ill-fated extension or guarantee Star Lotulelei $25M+ or give Corey Coleman $3.5M for a 10 day try-out.  

 

2) The UFA's they lost were mostly prime aged players as I've said.   You think losing defensive players like Gilmore or Brown was entirely moot because the defense isn't bad............well they have since spent 3 of their 4 first round picks on defense now haven't they?    One was a boundary CB the other was a MLB.   Hmmm.   I guess you don't value draft picks but I'll take Gilmore(1st team All Pro) and Mahomes(50 TD passes 2nd most all time) over Tre White and Tre Edmunds.   So would every non-Bills NFL fan or observer.  Choices were made not forced upon them.

 

3) UFA's aren't in the pro personnel tally..........they are part of your draft work.   And as much as I like a lot of the players they have drafted it's not uncommon for drafts to look promising in the first 2-3 seasons and then fall apart.    Tre White and Matt Milano are pretty much the only McDermott draft picks we aren't still grading on a curve right now.   Zay Jones and Dion Dawkins and Tre Edmunds and Josh Allen's 2018 play won't be too appealing if repeated this year.........it will be grounds for necessary replacement.    I hope Gaines and Johnson pan out but there were talent evaluators that thought those two contracts the Bills gave two busted up vets were very generous under the circumstance...........so it could just end up being more of the same as the 2018 UFA class.    That class was 0-9.   All duds for the dollars.  Trent Murphy is the only hope for that group.   

 

    

 

Agreed. This is the part where the personal insults usually start flying.

 

Or the "hindsight" defense.

 

Or "Sorry Beane didn't do exactly what YOU wanted him to do"

 

What people who say these things don't understand is being critical of a GM or coach doesn't just happen due to some irrational hatred of the guy or organization.

 

Edited by Chemical
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

1) The bolded is all you need to say.   It was a choice.    They had well over $100M in uncommitted salary cap space for 2019 heading into the 2017 offseason.   They could have pushed and adjusted anything they needed to to keep long term contract guys like Gilmore and Woods and whoever.    If you need me to explain how then you haven't been paying much attention to the NFL.   Signing bonuses and amortization are nice tools but guaranteed dollars come in many malleable forms.    

 

They CHOSE not to spend then.     It was a choice.    They didn't have to stand pat in UFA or trade their existing prime young talent........but they did.    Just like they didn't have to sign Wood to an ill-fated extension or guarantee Star Lotulelei $25M+ or give Corey Coleman $3.5M for a 10 day try-out.  

 

2) The UFA's they lost were mostly prime aged players as I've said.   You think losing defensive players like Gilmore or Brown was entirely moot because the defense isn't bad............well they have since spent 3 of their 4 first round picks on defense now haven't they?    One was a boundary CB the other was a MLB.   Hmmm.   I guess you don't value draft picks but I'll take Gilmore(1st team All Pro) and Mahomes(50 TD passes 2nd most all time) over Tre White and Tre Edmunds.   So would every non-Bills NFL fan or observer.  Choices were made not forced upon them.

 

3) UFA's aren't in the pro personnel tally..........they are part of your draft work.   And as much as I like a lot of the players they have drafted it's not uncommon for drafts to look promising in the first 2-3 seasons and then fall apart.    Tre White and Matt Milano are pretty much the only McDermott draft picks we aren't still grading on a curve right now.   Zay Jones and Dion Dawkins and Tre Edmunds and Josh Allen's 2018 play won't be too appealing if repeated this year.........it will be grounds for necessary replacement.    I hope Gaines and Johnson pan out but there were talent evaluators that thought those two contracts the Bills gave two busted up vets were very generous under the circumstance...........so it could just end up being more of the same as the 2018 UFA class.    That class was 0-9.   All duds for the dollars.  Trent Murphy is the only hope for that group.  

 

The "prime young talent" to which you refer is overblown.  Sammy hasn't cracked 600 yards since he left Buffalo and is basically just a decoy at $17M/year.  They made the right decision trading him and Foster can replicate what he can do at a fraction of the price.  Gilmore never even sniffed a Pro Bowl in his 5 years in Buffalo and is only an All-Pro because he plays under Belicheat (Malcolm Butler anyone?).  I'd take White at 1/5 the salary anyday.  And Dareus' play slipped last year as the Jags' run defense was middle of the pack and actually worse in YPR than the Bills' was.  As for Woods, no one would have considered him a "prime talent" after the 2017 season.  If he can continue producing at his 2018 level, he might be considered one but I'm sure McVay was surprised at his 2018 season.  None of the moves you've advocated would have changed much WRT either 2017 or 2018.

 

As for Mahomes, I don't recall you saying anything about him prior to the draft.  And most had concerns about him otherwise he wouldn't have made it out of the top-3.  It's just more hindsight like the "Wood extension."  It would have been interesting to see him play on the Bills' offense last year though. 

 

But we can play "what if" all day.  They did what they set out to do: rebuild the roster with their guys, clear cap space and get what they feel is their franchise QB.  And they killed the drought during the rebuild.  We'll see how it all plays out.

Edited by Doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

The "prime young talent" to which you refer is overblown.  Sammy hasn't cracked 600 yards since he left Buffalo and is basically just a decoy at $17M/year.  They made the right decision trading him and Foster can replicate what he can do at a fraction of the price.  Gilmore never even sniffed a Pro Bowl in his 5 years in Buffalo and is only an All-Pro because he plays under Belicheat (Malcolm Butler anyone?).  I'd take White at 1/5 the salary anyday.  And Dareus' play slipped last year as the Jags' run defense was middle of the pack and actually worse in YPR than the Bills' was.  As for Woods, no one would have considered him a "prime talent" after the 2017 season.  If he can continue producing at his 2018 level, he might be considered one but I'm sure McVay was surprised at his 2018 season.  None of the moves you've advocated would have changed much WRT either 2017 or 2018.

 

As for Mahomes, I don't recall you saying anything about him prior to the draft.  And most had concerns about him otherwise he wouldn't have made it out of the top-3.  It's just more hindsight like the "Wood extension."  It would have been interesting to see him play on the Bills' offense last year though. 

 

But we can play "what if" all day.  They did what they set out to do: rebuild the roster with their guys, clear cap space and get what they feel is their franchise QB.  And they killed the drought during the rebuild.  We'll see how it all plays out.

 

 

What I can tell you is that Gilmore was a 1st team All Pro last year..........and Bob Woods had over 1200 yards receiving...........Watkins lined up across from Gilmore in the AFC Championship game.   He is a proven difference maker when healthy.  If they weren't going to do that here under McDermott and Beane then that's an indictment of them not a defense.

 

Those players are all good and cost the Bills a bunch of draft capital to draft.    Re-sign them all..........2 out of 3 stay healthy......you won that deal.    And Star Lotulelei was a terrible signing..........it was a favorite as THE WORST signing by NFL observers that offseason and it only worsened when he somehow had by far the least productive season of his career.   It's almost unfathomable that they ate Dareus dead money and then guaranteed $25M to a traffic cone.  

 

All this said..........you have to be making bad decisions all the time to become or stay bad in the NFL.   It's set up to help even bad organizations remain competitive.    We shouldn't have to pretend that what McBeane have done is some kind of slam dunk.   All they've done is maintain their mediocre status...........it can still go either way but the mistakes are mounting.   They need their draft picks to step up past the stage where they needed to be graded on a curve and their UFA's to actually start panning out.   The team and staff is practically entirely hand picked.   The excuses stop here in 2019.   

  • Like (+1) 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

1) The bolded is all you need to say.   It was a choice.    They had well over $100M in uncommitted salary cap space for 2019 heading into the 2017 offseason.   They could have pushed and adjusted anything they needed to to keep long term contract guys like Gilmore and Woods and whoever.    If you need me to explain how then you haven't been paying much attention to the NFL.   Signing bonuses and amortization are nice tools but guaranteed dollars come in many malleable forms.    

 

They CHOSE not to spend then.     It was a choice.    They didn't have to stand pat in UFA or trade their existing prime young talent........but they did.    Just like they didn't have to sign Wood to an ill-fated extension or guarantee Star Lotulelei $25M+ or give Corey Coleman $3.5M for a 10 day try-out.  

 

2) The UFA's they lost were mostly prime aged players as I've said.   You think losing defensive players like Gilmore or Brown was entirely moot because the defense isn't bad............well they have since spent 3 of their 4 first round picks on defense now haven't they?    One was a boundary CB the other was a MLB.   Hmmm.   I guess you don't value draft picks but I'll take Gilmore(1st team All Pro) and Mahomes(50 TD passes 2nd most all time) over Tre White and Tre Edmunds.   So would every non-Bills NFL fan or observer.  Choices were made not forced upon them.

 

3) UFA's aren't in the pro personnel tally..........they are part of your draft work.   And as much as I like a lot of the players they have drafted it's not uncommon for drafts to look promising in the first 2-3 seasons and then fall apart.    Tre White and Matt Milano are pretty much the only McDermott draft picks we aren't still grading on a curve right now.   Zay Jones and Dion Dawkins and Tre Edmunds and Josh Allen's 2018 play won't be too appealing if repeated this year.........it will be grounds for necessary replacement.    I hope Gaines and Johnson pan out but there were talent evaluators that thought those two contracts the Bills gave two busted up vets were very generous under the circumstance...........so it could just end up being more of the same as the 2018 UFA class.    That class was 0-9.   All duds for the dollars.  Trent Murphy is the only hope for that group.    

 

I did my own cap assessment and basically came to the same conclusion as BadOl in 2017

McDermott and Beane chose to handle the cap situation the way they did, which created a "tight cap" situation last year.  The narrative that they inherited a talent-depleted roster that lacked cap space to re-sign the talent they had, is just not right. 

I'm not saying what they did is wrong.  It's a truism that you can't institute change - cultural change, attitude change, whatever - by keeping things the same.

But it clearly wasn't their only choice.  It was a choice. 

And it's a fact that by painting the roster as a "cupboard bare, must strip and rebuild" scenario they've bought themselves more time in the eyes of the fans (and perhaps owners) than if they kept to the "we're not as far off as people think" of Nix or "we're close" of Whaley.

I want to be Hopeful, truly I do.  But a number of the choices they've made are puzzling indeed to me, and their choices/management at QB, WR, and OL lead the way in puzzlement.
 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/21/2019 at 7:27 AM, Rocket94 said:

If moving Edmunds outside were to happen, who is ready to step up in the middle? This remains to be seen.

Nobody. It's not going to happen this year. They committed to Edmunds in the middle. I would have liked to see them bring in a vet MLB. You can find "reliable" middle linebackers pretty easily. They're clearly all in. 

 

Edit; Maybe Bynes.

Edited by LSHMEAB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LSHMEAB said:

Nobody. It's not going to happen this year. They committed to Edmunds in the middle. I would have liked to see them bring in a vet MLB. You can find "reliable" middle linebackers pretty easily. They're clearly all in. 

 

Edit; Maybe Bynes.

Yeah...you are absolutely right. I think the fact that we discussed it before had me believing that it was a possibility. I am anxious to see if Edmunds steps it up this year. He is 21 with tons of ability. Yeah...there are always professional linebackers around. Two more in camp today. Of the two, Bynes is an intriguing player. Not the greatest skill set but intelligent and instinctual. 

Edited by Rocket94
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...