Jump to content

Chiefs release Kareem Hunt after video from February incident surfaces


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

He is a big part of Kansas City's production

 

Is Rome about to fall?

 

Ware filled in admirably in 2016 due to injury. Small guy, but can run well and catch. Tyreek Hill would be a much, much bigger loss IMO. I think they'll be fine.

 

 

Edited by Golden Goat
corrected the year
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Returntoglory said:

What a POS! NO WAY he gets out of this. It will be interesting to see the position the players union takes on this. Unbelievable! ?

I'm hearing 2 weeks. If true could see the players union just keeping shut lol.. for better or worse.. well worse lol

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

I am VERY against laying hands on a female.  But I do have to disagree here with the generalization of this.  Its easy to say these things, but when a female is literally laying hands on you, nobody is just going to put their hands behind their back and let her keep going without restraint.

 

Multiple times she came at him and others.  He pushed her back multiple times, she keeps instigating.  We are all human beings, we cant just say well she's a girl so he has to just let her attack and him not try and defend the action.  He could have easily fought back with real force, but he didn't.  He pushed her away while others got in middle to keep separating it and she came back multiple times.  Not like he knocked her out or punched her in the face.  And she had MANY times to leave, she's in a hall way of a hotel and could have just left for good.  They were trying to make her leave and she wouldnt in fact.  

 

So there is more to this than just treating Hunt like a monster who assaulted a woman the way TMZ is trying to paint it.

 

He could have taken his girlfriend and WALKED AWAY.

 

Just saying.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have walked away, but the woman put her hands on him.

 

The woman had no right putting her hands on him, so something should happen with her too.

 

But no, she will get away Scott free, while Hunt faces the severe backlash, unjust or not.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, njbuff said:

I would have walked away, but the woman put her hands on him.

 

The woman had no right putting her hands on him, so something should happen with her too.

 

But no, she will get away Scott free, while Hunt faces the severe backlash, unjust or not.

If her employer wishes to punish her for embarrassing them, I’m sure they can. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, njbuff said:

I would have walked away, but the woman put her hands on him.

 

The woman had no right putting her hands on him, so something should happen with her too.

 

But no, she will get away Scott free, while Hunt faces the severe backlash, unjust or not.

 

I don't know about you, but I was raised to never lay hands on a woman. I was MARRIED to a violent woman. She'd hit me, throw crap at me, curse at me, get in my face. And not ONCE in  FIFTEEN YEARS did I ever lay a finger on her. I'd walk out the house, get in the car and drive somewhere if it got bad. If it wasn't too bad, I'd go to another room.

 

THERE IS NEVER A GOOD REASON FOR A MAN TO HIT A WOMAN.

 

Ever.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, njbuff said:

I would have walked away, but the woman put her hands on him.

 

The woman had no right putting her hands on him, so something should happen with her too.

 

But no, she will get away Scott free, while Hunt faces the severe backlash, unjust or not.

 

Clearly, you were raised with a different set of values than most of the gentlemen on this board.

 

.

 

14 minutes ago, njbuff said:

Like I said, I’d walk away, but every man reacts differently and sometimes in a way that will get you in a lot of trouble.

 

But there is no excuse for a woman to start something by getting physical with a man.

 

Did you even watch the video?  Hunt shoved her first.

.

 

Edited by The Senator
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

I don't know about you, but I was raised to never lay hands on a woman. I was MARRIED to a violent woman. She'd hit me, throw crap at me, curse at me, get in my face. And not ONCE in  FIFTEEN YEARS did I ever lay a finger on her. I'd walk out the house, get in the car and drive somewhere if it got bad. If it wasn't too bad, I'd go to another room.

 

THERE IS NEVER A GOOD REASON FOR A MAN TO HIT A WOMAN.

 

Ever.

 

 

I'm going to agree with njbuff on this one. The reason why women think they can abuse men is because of the whole "never hit a woman" rule. They think they're invincible and can go after men because of it. 

 

Why is she trying to fight him knowing he could hurt her? If that were a smaller man who did that and he got his ass kicked everyone would say the guy deserved it and probably be cheering it. Hell when IK Enemkpali broke Geno Smith's jaw everyone thought it was the greatest thing ever. Why is violence towards men accepted? 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, The Senator said:

 

Clearly, you were raised with a different set of values than most of the gentlemen on this board.

 

.

 

 

Did you even watch the video?  Hunt shoved her first.

.

 

 

If that’s the case, I take it all back.

 

I was under the impression she put her hands on him first.

 

But does the video tell the whole story?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...