Jump to content

Midterm Election Gameday Thread


Recommended Posts

William Mattox makes an observation that may serve a contrary point in the Wall Street Journal column “‘School-choice moms’ tipped the Florida governor’s race.” Coincidentally, it also derives from a statewide Florida election. Mattox attributes the victory of Ron DeSantis over Andrew Gillum to well-informed black female voters who opted for DeSantis because of his support of Florida’s Step Up For Students school-choice program. He writes:

Believe it or not, Republican Ron DeSantis owes his victory in the Florida gubernatorial election to about 100,000 African-American women who unexpectedly chose him over the black Democratic candidate, Andrew Gillum.

 

Of the roughly 650,000 black women who voted in Florida, 18% chose Mr. DeSantis, according to CNN’s exit poll of 3,108 voters. This exceeded their support for GOP U.S. Senate candidate Rick Scott (9%), Mr. DeSantis’s performance among black men (8%) and the GOP’s national average among black women (7%).

 

To be sure, 18% of the black female vote in Florida is equal to less than 2% of the total electorate. But in an election decided by fewer than 40,000 votes, these 100,000 black women proved decisive. Their apparent ticket splitting helps to explain why the Florida governor’s race wasn’t as close as the Florida Senate race, though Mr. Gillum was widely expected to carry Democrat Sen. Bill Nelson to victory on his coattails.

 

What explains Mr. DeSantis’ surprising support from African-American women? Two words: school choice.

 

Mattox hopes Republicans will take encouragement for the future in his findings: “The unexpected outcome of the Florida governor’s race should encourage Republicans nationwide to pitch their education agenda to minority voters.” I find encouragement now in the state of knowledge among the voters Mattox focuses on.

 

Read the whole thing here.

 

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

“Trump-centric strategy backfired spectacularly in the race for control of the House, as suburban voters revolted against the president, delivering a rebuke to his party’s candidates in district after district. Democrats have gained 39 seats in the House with the possibility of hitting 40 depending on the outcome of the still uncalled election in California’s 21st District.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-results-underscore-that-whats-good-for-trump-isnt-so-good-for-the-gop/2018/11/24/930652ce-ef98-11e8-96d4-0d23f2aaad09_story.html?utm_term=.5bd7ffa21161

 

Trump 2020!!! Yes!!! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


NBC News buying from the same meth lab CNN has been using?  

Fairly certain the following poster has been going to a meth lab

3 hours ago, BeginnersMind said:

If you use the search function, you will see this topic has been covered elsewhere.

 

I thought his place was the Wild West. I’ve deleted 7-8 threads, not just those on the topics mentioned in Azalin’s post. I don’t delete to be mean—I just do it when it’s spun way off topic or devolved into just an attack thread (not just on me but others). Which that one did. 

 

I’m proud that deleting a thread about building positive online community brought us all together. We can work on the positivity but ... baby steps!

 

With love and kisses to you all and Season’s Greetings to everyone except LSH who doesn’t want to celebrate the earth’s revolution around the Sun.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Not sure I trust those numbers. At all.

You can't honestly believe that horseshit when the statement is 60% college grads and 45% of whites.  The gymnastics of that seem unpossible given the majority of this country is whites.   The 20% of America seems likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Doc Brown said:

Considering the Mississippi seat is up again in 2018 it means next to nothing between a 52-48 or 53-47 GOP majority with Flake leaving.

 

2020?

Just now, Boyst62 said:

Who do "we"wAnt  to win in MS?

 

 

Difference is between a 52-48 GOP majority (really 51 with Mitt becoming McCain 2.0) or a 53-47 majority (really 52-48).

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:

Considering the Mississippi seat is up again in 2020 it means next to nothing between a 52-48 or 53-47 GOP majority with Flake leaving.


If Mississippi flips from D to R, Kamala Harris gets bumped off the judiciary committee. She's the most junior member for the minority party, so bub-bye.

However, according to the MSM it is...wait for it... racism.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taking a dump I looked at the first possible black senator since reconstruction...

Funny. Newer photos make him look awfully pale but a few older photos made him look much darker.   I'm sure the media slid some colors around but the dude ain't black and it doesn't matter if he is or isn't either way.  Just interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

So it should take about two weeks of counting extra ballots before Espy is declared the winner?

 

Correct. He's not conceding until every dead person's vote is counted.
 

3 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

One thing we've pry learned is early voting results and early exit polls usually mean nothing.


Ain't that the truth.

 

Edited by Golden Goat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

So it should take about two weeks of counting extra ballots before Espy is declared the winner?

 

45 minutes ago, Golden Goat said:

 

Correct. He's not conceding until every dead person's vote is counted.

 

I thought this was a parody account at first :lol: 

 

 

(relevant image - not included in the tweet)

 

7b89c80651465d125c6596bd51be600610f64c2e4883f6bd9554f15d44e9eb3c.png

 

 

Right after that one he tweeted this:

 

Edited by Deranged Rhino
  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Golden Goat said:

 

There's not much you can figure out. That's one of the many reasons we laugh at you. She even won the popular vote!

 

53

Ignorant people always laugh at things they do not understand, so that in no ways bothers me. 

 

Congrats   on winning in Mississippi. Dodged a bullet. Trump keeps making places like that competitive. Love it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Ignorant people always laugh at things they do not understand, so that in no ways bothers me. 

 

Congrats   on winning in Mississippi. Dodged a bullet. Trump keeps making places like that competitive. Love it. 

Did you not understand the deaths in Benghazi? You certainly laughed at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WILLIAM MURCHISON: What posturing and positioning we can expect from the next Democratic House.

 

The New Deal, without precisely turning Democrats into the Planning Party, planted in them an enthusiasm for giving orders and directions to people not necessarily enthusiastic about being told what to do. And so came to pass the progressive vision: Progress our way, because we know what’s good for you.

 

What’s ahead? Other than attempted impeachment of the president? The progressive agenda will take shape in the House: probably a $15 minimum wage; maybe free college tuition and broad legalization of marijuana; almost certainly, tighter control of pharmacy prices and laxer oversight of immigration. Higher taxes on business will be proposed. Also, mandatory maternity leave from work. A federal support check for every taxpayer is a progressive notion looking better and better to poverty-fighters.

 

And what items on this large and luscious list will become law? None of them, actually. Not in 2019 and 2020. The Republican-controlled, and easily more conservative, Senate will shoot down all of them.

 

 

I expect that with the Senate (hopefully) going back to its traditional role of the chamber where bad ideas go to die, that the Democratic House is going to be an even bigger circus than usual — especially given the unprecedented numbers of vocal “democratic” socialists about to join Pelosi’s caucus.

 

If nothing else, it should prove entertaining.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...