Jump to content

Helsinki Summit


Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

There are 4-5 semi-deranged fascists on this board who have pretty much chased away all remaining objective, rational posters.  They talk to themselves all day and take their own collective agreement as some kind of sign that their "side" is winning the cultural war.  If you confront them with the lunacy of the current POTUS regime, their response is one of the following (i) snark; (ii) "But Obama/Hillary," or (iii) the media/intelligence community/any evidence contrary to their opinion is part of some deep state conspiracy of lies.

 

They are lunatics engaged in a "Fox 'N' Friends" circle jerk on this forum.  If you scroll up in the thread you'll see that they've started to attract the far-right (or far-left) anti-Semitic Lyndon Larouche crowd who think 9/11 was an inside job/manufactured by the Mossad.  This is not a surprise.  Most intelligent, rational posters stay away from this corner of the Wall - what I refer to as TSW's Taint.

 

Best comedy of the week.

 

Larouche hasn’t been around since 1987.

 

Thanks fo this laugh there

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

He chose to believe Putin over his own intelligence people. He took a totally off-the-record meeting with Putin after 12 Russian agents were indicted by our Justice Dept. What more do you want? Or are you going to play word games over the meaning of "sell out?"

 

Question: did you support the intelligence community when they said there were WMDs in Iraq? How about when they waterboarded people?

 

NO? Then that makes you a !@#$ing hypocrite. Be gone. See, some of us can learn from history. And still more of us know a coup when we see it. Just because your shrieking shrew of a !@#$ lost the election doesn't mean the Russians interfered.

 

 

 

Edited by joesixpack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Traitor Caucus has slowed down here. Where is your anti-USA, pro-Putin spirit? You are letting your Dear Leader down.

 

We know most of the GOP Congress hasn’t defended Trump’s treasonous actions and even a nice handful have outright condemn him, that Fox News commentators have expressed disappointment at Trump outright treachery and even Gingrich said he needed to defend the USA, but we know the hardcore zealots on this board won’t let facts and patriotism get in the way of an old fashion tirade against Hillary or something. 

 

Have a a great day. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/indictment-of-12-russians-under-the-shiny-wrapping-a-political-act/

Ritter's take on the indictment and its timing. 

 

Interestingly, many here, who now distrust the IC, disparaged this guy when he tried to expose the wmd in Iraq BS. . On the other hand, those in the hysterical camp willl now lump me in the traitor category....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TPS said:

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/indictment-of-12-russians-under-the-shiny-wrapping-a-political-act/

Ritter's take on the indictment and its timing. 

 

Interestingly, many here, who now distrust the IC, disparaged this guy when he tried to expose the wmd in Iraq BS. . On the other hand, those in the hysterical camp willl now lump me in the traitor category....

Some people also disparaged the guy when he was exposed as a pedophile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TPS said:

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/indictment-of-12-russians-under-the-shiny-wrapping-a-political-act/

Ritter's take on the indictment and its timing. 

 

Interestingly, many here, who now distrust the IC, disparaged this guy when he tried to expose the wmd in Iraq BS. . On the other hand, those in the hysterical camp willl now lump me in the traitor category....

 

EXCELLENT read. from the article:

 

Quote

Despite Rosenstein’s assertions to the contrary, the decision to release the indictment of the 12 named Russian military intelligence officers was an act of partisan warfare designed to tip the scale of public opinion against the supporters of President Trump, and in favor of those who oppose him politically, Democrat and Republican alike. Based upon the media coverage since Rosenstein’s press conference, it appears that in this he has been wildly successful.

 

Rosenstein is scum, and needs to be removed by Trump ASAP.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

EXCELLENT read. from the article:

 

 

Rosenstein is scum, and needs to be removed by Trump ASAP.

 

 

Longtime-GOP prosecutor with a sterling record of personal and professional  integrity = bad

 

Degenerate liar, cheater, undignified, Putin loving, horrible person = good

 

Keep it up traitor-enablers, you are on a roll

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

I'm not going to play word games.  I am going to question how meeting with the leader of a foreign country is "selling out" under any circumstances.  Did he actually concede something to Putin?  Did he pardon those 12 Russians?  

 

I simply doubt that you know if he chose to believe Putin over the IC or not.  You doubtlessly didn't listen to the press conference, so I imagine you're getting cherry-picked quotes from CNN.

 

No, I listen to the quotes of our director of national intelligence and former head of the CIA.

 

If you can't smell the stink...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

What was Trump doing while Mueller was recovering from his combat wounds in 1968?

Mueller is a Marine

 

Getting 5 cowardly deferments (even though he always wanted a Purple Heart :blink:) with the same weak behavior he showed yesterday as he completely capitulated to Putin as everyone knew he would.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

No, I listen to the quotes of our director of national intelligence and former head of the CIA.

 

If you can't smell the stink...

 

 

9/11  biffed

WMD  lied

Hillary kowtowed

 

not an impressive track record for the 3 main events of the last 20 years

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

No, I listen to the quotes of our director of national intelligence and former head of the CIA.

 

If you can't smell the stink...


People do smell the stink. The scent coming off John Brennan yesterday was so malodorous the whole world got a whiff.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

EXCELLENT read. from the article:

 

 

Rosenstein is scum, and needs to be removed by Trump ASAP.

 

 

Rosenstein, a Trump hire btw, may end up a national hero because he actually is standing up to the traitor-in-chief and doing the job he swore to in his oath. (You know, some garbage about protecting the nation from all enemies, yadda yadda.)

 

It's pretty obvious where you and your buddies get your news from. You need to turn off Sean Hannity and drug-addled Rush Limbaugh and see if your brain can recover from all the traitor-loving pablum you get force-fed

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

Rosenstein, a Trump hire btw, may end up a national hero because he actually is standing up to the traitor-in-chief and doing the job he swore to in his oath. (You know, some garbage about protecting the nation from all enemies, yadda yadda.)

 

It's pretty obvious where you and your buddies get your news from. You need to turn off Sean Hannity and drug-addled Rush Limbaugh and see if your brain can recover from all the traitor-loving pablum you get force-fed

 

 

????????????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

Rosenstein, a Trump hire btw, may end up a national hero because he actually is standing up to the traitor-in-chief and doing the job he swore to in his oath. (You know, some garbage about protecting the nation from all enemies, yadda yadda.)

 

It's pretty obvious where you and your buddies get your news from. You need to turn off Sean Hannity and drug-addled Rush Limbaugh and see if your brain can recover from all the traitor-loving pablum you get force-fed

 

1) don't watch fox, don't trust THEM either.

 

2) haven't listened to Rush Limbaugh in almost 20 years.

 

3) Am not a Republican. Despise them as much as I do the loathsome democrats.

 

I, too, at one time swore an oath to defend this country from enemies, both foreign and DOMESTIC. My fight against the coup plotters and their supporters in the media and the public (like you) is something I take VERY seriously. You, and the people who think like you, are dangerous to this nation. I'd argue that you're a bigger threat to this country than anything outside its borders. For TWO YEARS people like you have been trying anything and everything to reverse the outcome of an election you didn't like. HOW DARE YOU proclaim anyone else a traitor?

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, TPS said:

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/indictment-of-12-russians-under-the-shiny-wrapping-a-political-act/

Ritter's take on the indictment and its timing. 

 

Interestingly, many here, who now distrust the IC, disparaged this guy when he tried to expose the wmd in Iraq BS. . On the other hand, those in the hysterical camp willl now lump me in the traitor category....

Interesting read. Sounds sort of like the criticism leveled at Comey in October '16, though no election is taking place now.

 

I just don't see it as a partisan document (the indictment)  so much as a national security document. Obviously Trump is not trusted to protect us and the FBI acted on that. Had Trump simply shown any backbone at all with Putin this would not have mattered. Trump could have turned this into a victory for himself very easily and come out and challenged Putin and or canceled the useless summit. He did not. The FBI was sending a message, there is no doubt, you can agree or disagree with it.

 

It's obviously just conjecture on my part, but the fact Trump wanted to meet with zero transparency a guy who attacked our election must have sent red flags waving. The FBI, I think, wanted to say, "we know what you are doing and we will find out what you two are conspiring about,"

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

 

9/11  biffed

WMD  lied

Hillary kowtowed

 

not an impressive track record for the 3 main events of the last 20 years

 

 

When you can't refute the message, you attack the messenger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

When you can't refute the message, you attack the messenger.

100% !@#$ the FBI

 

100% the real FBI isn't in the beltway and those in the beltway can go to Hell.

 

Mind you, I know what I'm talking about. Comey, the weasel, and trust me, if you've ever met him, you know it... Sold out the FBI but not as bad as McCabe, etc.

 

Sorry, PTR, with all due respect you're not up to speed on this. Trump is a douchebag but he's doing a lot of good things and he didn't "sell out" Murika.  There is just far too much here to wrap up easily.

 

I'll go back in to hiding.  Too many pussies reporting me for stuff and it's easier to observe or ignore the board while it melts down with snowflakes and egregious exaggerating bloviating on TSW...

 

Deuces

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

You believe John Brennan to be credible?

 

 

 

He was on TV?

34 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

No, I listen to the quotes of our director of national intelligence and former head of the CIA.

 

If you can't smell the stink...

 

What if you believe the theory that Brennan was the spearhead of the coup plotters?  Would his comments carry more or less weight?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

When you can't refute the message, you attack the messenger.

 

 

change your name, you are disgracing the good name of PromoThe Robot

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, GG said:

 

He was on TV?

 

What if you believe the theory that Brennan was the spearhead of the coup plotters?  Would his comments carry more or less weight?

 

This is how your side deals with evidence. You make up conspiracies. Next thing your going to tell me is Putin is fighting to save America from the deep state. :lol:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

This is how your side deals with evidence. You make up conspiracies. Next thing your going to tell me is Putin is fighting to save America from the deep state. :lol:

 

change your name please, you are disgracing the good name of PromoTheRobot

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

This is how your side deals with evidence. You make up conspiracies. Next thing your going to tell me is Putin is fighting to save America from the deep state. :lol:

 

There's far more evidence out there that Brennan & Clapper were behind illegal acts than there is of Trump/Russia collusion.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

No, I listen to the quotes of our director of national intelligence and former head of the CIA.

 

If you can't smell the stink...

 

So your opinion of Trump's meeting with Putin being treasonous isn't yours, it's John Brennan's.

 

Then why the hell should anyone discuss it with you?  We should be discussing it with Brennan and the rest of MSNBC.

 

You're not worth talking to.  You don't even have your own outrage, you have to borrow the outrage of others.  

36 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

When you can't refute the message, you attack the messenger.

 

What makes Trump's actions treason?  Use specifics.  Start with defining "treason."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

So your opinion of Trump's meeting with Putin being treasonous isn't yours, it's John Brennan's.

 

Then why the hell should anyone discuss it with you?  We should be discussing it with Brennan and the rest of MSNBC.

 

You're not worth talking to.  You don't even have your own outrage, you have to borrow the outrage of others.  

It's scary how many people outsource their thinking. Then again, it might be even scarier to see the result of them thinking for themselves.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

It's scary how many people outsource their thinking. Then again, it might be even scarier to see the result of them thinking for themselves.

 

What's scary is that they outsource their outrage, and don't apply any thinking.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

What's scary is that they outsource their outrage, and don't apply any thinking.

 

almost all this yelling and finger pointing on here isn't much of an accomplishment, aside from being very amusing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

Some people also disparaged the guy when he was exposed as a pedophile.

I've read the details about this online incident with a 15-year old girl. I certainly won't defend him, but I will say, as one of the few critics of Bush2's drive for war with Iraq, there is no doubt he was targeted, much like a former AG/Governor of NY.  It tends to happen to those who criticize the power structure....

Edited by TPS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TPS said:

I've read the details about this online incident with a 15-year old girl. I certainly won't defend him, but I will say, as one of the few critics of Bush2's drive for war with Iraq, there is no doubt he was targeted, much like a former AG/Governor of WNY.  It tends to happen to those who criticize the power structure....

Are you talking about Spitzer or Schneiderman?

 

Also, I believe Ritter's transgressions were more than online.  I believe he showed up for a meet and met the FBI instead of his intended companion.  That is not online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

Are you talking about Spitzer or Schneiderman?

 

Also, I believe Ritter's transgressions were more than online.  I believe he showed up for a meet and met the FBI instead of his intended companion.  That is not online.

That's to say nothing about screwing over Jack Ryan.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

That's to say nothing about screwing over Jack Ryan.

 

Oh, give me a break.  Ryan was always poaching Ritter's turf - the IRA, Krasny Oktyabr, the Gerasimov defection - and the only op Ritter was responsible for, Ryan had to clean up.  Ryan wasn't the one being screwed over.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

Are you talking about Spitzer or Schneiderman?

 

Also, I believe Ritter's transgressions were more than online.  I believe he showed up for a meet and met the FBI instead of his intended companion.  That is not online.

 

how do you have time to get worried about all this?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...