Jump to content

Which Bills Decision Infuriated You?


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, folz said:

When Whaley released Fred Jackson!

Really?  He didn't do anything in Seattle.  He was done.  Great guy but there must be 100 or probably 200 more infuriating moves than releasing Fred Jackson.  Hell with RBs alone, there is letting Cribbs go, trading Lynch, misusing OJ early in his career, drafting Spiller and McGahee, and if you want to add cutting aging players - releasing Thurman Thomas who could have still played a year and retired never having worn a Dolphins jersey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Golden Goat said:

Trading up for T.J. Graham.

 

I remember watching the draft with a friend, who follows college football more than I do.   I said "Who?" and started to look him up when my friend blurted out "had a 4th round grade".

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dadonkadonk said:

1. Marv letting Kelly keep throwing the ball in the best chance to win a SB in franchise history

2. Not paying Jason Peters

3. Hiring Marv as GM

4. Hiring Dave Wannstedt as DC

5. Allowing Rex to dismantle the Jim Schwartz defense.  I had no issue with Rex as a HC hire.  I thought wrongly that he would retain Schwartz and just add a few blitz/coverage wrinkles to what Schwartz was doing.  If Rex had simply played the role of HC, both he and Whaley would be here now with multiple playoff seasons.  

 

Then you only watched the first 8 games he played and not the second 8. 

 

What does that even mean? 

 

Promise is promise whether you think it showed in just the 1st half or 2nd half of a rookie season.

 

I'm pretty confident that they moved him because of injury concerns after he missed the entire next season and not because of the final eight games of his rookie season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there was any bigger mistake than firing Polian.  He would have most likely gotten us a Super Bowl win and just look at how many on his staff went on to be GMs, Gettlemen, AJ Smith, Telesco, Butler, etc.

7 hours ago, Golden Goat said:

Trading up for T.J. Graham.

when we could have drafted Russell Wilson.....

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr. K said:

Hiring Rex, which necessarily meant getting rid of Schwartz. Moronic move, and I put it on the Pegulas. 

Just remember, 'Iago' and 'Aaron the Moor' were there whispering, "Don't let him out of the building".

Edited by Ridgewaycynic2013
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Fixxxer said:

Getting rid of Pat Williams

 

Whitner over Ngata

 

Aaron Maybin over Orapko.

 

Overpaying for Kelsay

 

Drafting McGahee

 

Rex over anyone. 

The bolded statements. Signing Doug Flutie, hated him before and during his Bills tenure. Another one is being "passive" in Super Bowl XXVIII just before half time and not trying to score a TD. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

if RJ hadn't fumbled the football out of the back of the EZ for a safety, that forward lateral "TD," would still not given them enough points to win. After the resulting free kick giving them excellent field position and motivation, they scored their only TD  of the game. Flutie starts that game we win going away.

 

I think that Flutie had some good years but looking at it 1999 probably wasn't his best:

75.1 passer rating

19 TD's - 16 INT's

6.6 YPA

Bills averaged just over 19 points per game

Those are not good numbers.

 

The one number everyone points to:

10-5 win-loss record.

However, the defense gave up a total of 110 points in those 10 wins.  11 points allowed per game is nice support.

 

In contrast which QB in Bills history had this stat line?:

84.9 passer rating

19 TD's - 14 INT's

7.1 YPA

Team averaged 18.75 points per game

 

Hint:  It's 2006 JP Losman

 

I think that Flutie wasn't great in '99 and it made this decision much easier.  As for winning the game going away I don't think Kelly in his prime wins that game going away.  He might win it but let's remember the Titans were a 13 win team that year not a bunch of stiffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Epstein's Mother said:

 

I think that Flutie had some good years but looking at it 1999 probably wasn't his best:

75.1 passer rating

19 TD's - 16 INT's

6.6 YPA

Bills averaged just over 19 points per game

Those are not good numbers.

 

The one number everyone points to:

10-5 win-loss record.

However, the defense gave up a total of 110 points in those 10 wins.  11 points allowed per game is nice support.

 

In contrast which QB in Bills history had this stat line?:

84.9 passer rating

19 TD's - 14 INT's

7.1 YPA

Team averaged 18.75 points per game

 

Hint:  It's 2006 JP Losman

 

I think that Flutie wasn't great in '99 and it made this decision much easier.  As for winning the game going away I don't think Kelly in his prime wins that game going away.  He might win it but let's remember the Titans were a 13 win team that year not a bunch of stiffs.

Watching the Bills try to score points under Flutie in 1999 was agonizing. People don't remember that he was being bailed out by the defense all season. 

Then Johnson comes into the last game against the Colts, who were 13-2 at that point, had won 11 in a row, and needed to beat the Bills to secure home field advantage throughout the playoffs. And under Johnson the Bills had their best offensive showing of the season and beat the Colts 31-6. 

 

THAT's why Flutie was benched for the playoff game against Tennessee.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a better topic would be which move by the McD/Beane era is most controversial.  After all, the number of "infuriating" decisions made by the Bills over the past 17 seasons (prior to McD/Beane) is staggering.

 

I think the decision to start Peterman against the Chargers was McD's worst move to date.  Thankfully he owned up to it immediately and never lost "the room."

 

2nd place is the decision to punt in OT of the snow game.  It worked out, but that was a pretty awful decision as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many great choice in this thread.  The thing I’m wondering though, is how many of these situations were you infuriated with at the time, as opposed to in hindsight.  Because it seems like a few of these selections are looking back in hindsight.

 

Case and point, the Rex Ryan hire.  Looking back I am infuriated that they were duped by that clown show.  But at the time, the majority of the fan base was pretty excited.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dr. K said:

Watching the Bills try to score points under Flutie in 1999 was agonizing. People don't remember that he was being bailed out by the defense all season. 

Then Johnson comes into the last game against the Colts, who were 13-2 at that point, had won 11 in a row, and needed to beat the Bills to secure home field advantage throughout the playoffs. And under Johnson the Bills had their best offensive showing of the season and beat the Colts 31-6. 

 

THAT's why Flutie was benched for the playoff game against Tennessee.  

 

I was at the Colts game the last game of that year and I thought Johnson looked like a stud.  Of course it didn't turn out that way but against the Colts he was impressive and I was very happy when he got the start against Tennessee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BuffaloRush said:

Many great choice in this thread.  The thing I’m wondering though, is how many of these situations were you infuriated with at the time, as opposed to in hindsight.  Because it seems like a few of these selections are looking back in hindsight.

 

Case and point, the Rex Ryan hire.  Looking back I am infuriated that they were duped by that clown show.  But at the time, the majority of the fan base was pretty excited.  

 

 

I spoke out about the Rex Ryan hire at the time. You could look it up. I thought it was a mistake from day one.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BuffaloRush said:

Case and point, the Rex Ryan hire.  Looking back I am infuriated that they were duped by that clown show.  But at the time, the majority of the fan base was pretty excited.  

 

 

There were more than just you.  I remember branding him as the return of 'Professor Harold Hill' / 'Mordecai Jones'.  Should have ridden him out of the building, tarred and feathered, on a rail.

Edited by Ridgewaycynic2013
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, THE SLAMMER said:

 

A good business doesn't take a 3 year in a row pro bowler and ask for a pay cut now do they?.  How do you know he lied about his injuries?

You do realize that agents have the power to ok a deal without having the player present, right? The players don't hop a jet for buffalo, this is why you hire an agent...most likely the reason for firing

Completed deals are electronically sent for approval sometimes without the player completely understanding the terms....it happens

Geeez, glad I don't work for you....90 % of this is hear say your honor....lol

 

Um, actually in the NFL they do....take a look at teams who cut bait with players in contracts all the time. Patriots are unfortunately notorious for this and other teams have taken aging, very good players, and either traded them or simply out-right cut them to save money or to get younger. In this case, the Bills were willing to keep him, but at a reduced price and we have to realize that some of what NFL players get paid for (if not MOST) is for what you project they will do, not what they have already done. Their history of success obviously points to what they can do, but the FA wire is littered with guys who were believed to have been great signings or "gets" only to find a year or two later, they're looking for a job. Richie is not immune to this effect. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...