Jump to content

Update! Beane is'nt done yet.


Recommended Posts

Just now, TallskiWallski83 said:

I dont understand why you would trade up to 3 right now when theres a possibility two teams jump up to 1 and 2 respectively and snag QB1 and QB2 on your board and youre left picking with the guys you didnt really want

 

Agreed. Unless they have 3 guys they would be good with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Giants might want to think about the plus side of taking a QB at #2 and letting him sit a few years behind Eli, like the Favre-Rogers handoff.

 

Green Bay has largely wasted Rogers career with a poor overall roster but they went from one HOF QB to another. That just doesn't happen often. Even going from a SB winning QB to a very good QB without any break doesn't happen often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TallskiWallski83 said:

I dont understand why you would trade up to 3 right now when theres a possibility two teams jump up to 1 and 2 respectively and snag QB1 and QB2 on your board and youre left picking with the guys you didnt really want

It also could be Gettleman told him he was taking Barkley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Binghamton Beast said:

 

I’m not sure I agree.

 

A QB is either worth it or he isn’t when you are talking picks that high.

 

 

 

And who knows for sure which of these top 3-4 guys is better than the rest - or if any of them is for that matter???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TallskiWallski83 said:

I dont understand why you would trade up to 3 right now when theres a possibility two teams jump up to 1 and 2 respectively and snag QB1 and QB2 on your board and youre left picking with the guys you didnt really want

 

I don't think GM's approach and grade that way.  They probably like all three guys.  It's like dating man.  You date three women at the same time and you could see yourself with either of them.  Just let things work themselves out but make sure you get 1 of them.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was Beane, I wouldn't do all of this work and trade most of my picks for any QB in this draft. I'm only doing it if Colts are serious about trading Andrew Luck. They been talking, which does not surprise me. I'll be talking Andrew Luck scenarios all day long with Colts' brass. Lucks' shoulder should not be a concern. Look at Peyton Manning when Colts released him. Peyton's shoulder and neck issues didn't matter.

 

We have enough picks to send to Colts. Colts didn't want Cordy Glenn all along. No one saw this coming.

Edited by Buffalo Ballin
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo Ballin said:

If I was Beane, I wouldn't do all of this work and trade most of my picks for any QB in this draft. I'm only doing it if Colts are serious about trading Andrew Luck. They been talking, which does not surprise me. I'll be talking Andrew Luck scenarios all day long with Colts' brass.

Shoulder questions? No thanks. He may come back like Pennington. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

You go to three if you have similar grades on the top 3. 

 

You also use 3 talk as a chip to aid in negotiations for 2 

 

The game is on.  We Bills fans are use to our GM's playing Chutes and Ladders.

I'm liking having a "Bobby Fischer" playing chess.

Let's see what happens now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buffalo Ballin said:

  Chad Pennington sucks. Andrew Luck is once in a decade QB. He's in our sights. Again, the shoulder issues don't matter. Ask Peyton Manning.

Pennington had a significantly stronger arm prior to his shoulder surgery and he didn't suck. Very accurate in his time and was trending up prior to his multiple surgeries. I may not be with the rest, but I'm not overly impressed by Luck, especially when you take into account the turnovers. I'll pass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Buffalo Ballin said:

If I was Beane, I wouldn't do all of this work and trade most of my picks for any QB in this draft. I'm only doing it if Colts are serious about trading Andrew Luck. They been talking, which does not surprise me. I'll be talking Andrew Luck scenarios all day long with Colts' brass. Lucks' shoulder should not be a concern. Look at Peyton Manning when Colts released him. Peyton's shoulder and neck issues didn't matter.

 

We have enough picks to send to Colts. Colts didn't want Cordy Glenn all along. No one saw this coming.

The indications certainly point to the likelihood that the bills are trying to maneuver up to one of the top picksThe indications certainly point to the likelihood that the bills are trying to maneuver up to  get one of the top three quarterbacks coming out from college. 

 

 However the Luck scenario is certainly plausible. 

 

  There is one other scenario here. The bills might be angling to get one of the top tier free agent quarterbacks such as Cousins, Foles or maybe even BreesAnd use their draft picks to shore up their  linebackers, defensive line and OL. They could get a stud linebacker or D lineman with number 12!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gamache518 said:

According to Buffalo report Bills reportedly have been talking to Colts in acquiring their 1st round draft pick (3). Both sides have been talking all day.

I'm Thinking 3 because Beane has talked to both the Browns and the Giants and The Browns are taking Darnold or Allen followed by the Giants taking Barkley is why 3 will be high enough for Rosen. IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TallskiWallski83 said:

I dont understand why you would trade up to 3 right now when theres a possibility two teams jump up to 1 and 2 respectively and snag QB1 and QB2 on your board and youre left picking with the guys you didnt really want

Lol Cleveland is not moving from #1... The Browns should just disband and move to London if that happened. Also Beane is BFF's with the Giants GM so he is like "Hey Bro who you taking"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...