Jump to content

Active shooter at Florida high school


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

Conservatives don't even have the balls to criticize white nationalism. 

If you made a search of this site you'd find examples of white nationalists who have been run out of this community by board conservatives for espousing hate.

 

But, like I said, you're a liberal of low morals so you're perfectly happy to lie to advance your agenda.  Par for the course.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TakeYouToTasker said:

If you made a search of this site you'd find examples of white nationalists who have been run out of this community by board conservatives for espousing hate.

 

But, like I said, you're a liberal of low morals so you're perfectly happy to lie to advance your agenda.  Par for the course.

 

 

 

Where was the morality when the White House tried to cover up a wife beater, attempted to promote him, and then defended him when he quit.

 

Trump is a self admitted sex offender and the right calls him a blessing from God. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, elroy16 said:

 

 

 

Where was the morality when the White House tried to cover up a wife beater, attempted to promote him, and then defended him when he quit.

 

Trump is a self admitted sex offender and the right calls him a blessing from God. 

 

This is a false equivalence where you attempt to justify outright lies being told to the people by CIA state propaganda to cover for crimes by the state with a single flawed man who assaulted another individual.

 

As to your assertions about the President, that's just another example of a low morals liberal telling another lie to advance their agenda.  Being truthful doesn't matter when you're resisting the duly elected President and trying to subvert democratic principals, amirite?

 

As an aside, can you please provide me with a complete list of actions an individual can take which you believe should prohibit them from ever being able to work again?

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GG said:

 

.. and is there a discussion about him here?

 

 

There's a 20 page thread complaining about what democrats have done for 6 months.

 

There's an 11 page thread complaining about CNN

 

There's a 90 page thread complaining about how the media treats Trump

 

...and within all this and all other complaining, there hasn't been a single complaint about a white nationalist running unopposed in the Republican Illinois Primary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

This is a false equivalence where you attempt to justify outright lies being told to the people by CIA state propaganda to cover for crimes by the state with a single flawed man who assaulted another individual.

 

As an aside, can you please provide me with a complete list of actions an individual can take which you believe should prohibit them from ever being able to work again?

 

 

 

So since the CIA/FBI/Obama/Hillary/Comey/Mueller/etc are all running this deep state government, are attempting to overthrow Trump with their coup, spying on civilians, and are trying to cover it up, it's OK that the right covers up a wife beater and Trump bragged about grabbing women by the kitty or walking into pageant changing rooms? 

 

 

Do I have that right or what am I missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

There's one running unopposed in the Illinois Republican Primary.

Again with the absurd levels of intellectual dishonesty.  Why is it so hard for you to be truthful about these things?

 

As happens with a good deal of frequency, Illinois Republicans were not planning on wasting resources running any candidate at all in that district because it is heavily Democratic and boasts a popular Democratic incumbent, and would rather simply concede a race they knew they had little to no chance of winning.

 

Then, at literally the last minute as he filed at the deadline, preventing the Illinois GOP from running anyone to oppose him out of principle, he declared against the wishes of the GOP who are vocally opposing him, and are now looking for an outside challenger.

 

But no, you come here and lie, framing your sentence in a way that would leave an uninformed reader to believe that the Republican Party is intentionally advancing white nationalists to platform their beliefs unopposed by choice.

 

Why do you do this?  How did you become so comfortable telling lies?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

If conservatives really criticize their own more than liberals, you think they would have criticized Arthur Jones by now.

 

the founder of Nautilus? the Dallas Cowboy?  those took up the first 2 pages of google...

 

[conservatives have a job usually and don't care about sports or politics all that much if it interferes]

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

Again with the absurd levels of intellectual dishonesty.  Why is it so hard for you to be truthful about these things?

 

As happens with a good deal of frequency, Illinois Republicans were not planning on wasting resources running any candidate at all in that district because it is heavily Democratic and boasts a popular Democratic incumbent, and would rather simply concede a race they knew they had little to no chance of winning.

 

Then, at literally the last minute as he filed at the deadline, preventing the Illinois GOP from running anyone to oppose him out of principle, he declared against the wishes of the GOP who are vocally opposing him, and are now looking for an outside challenger.

 

But no, you come here and lie, framing your sentence in a way that would leave an uninformed reader to believe that the Republican Party is intentionally advancing white nationalists to platform their beliefs unopposed by choice.

 

Why do you do this?  How did you become so comfortable telling lies?

 

The 600 signatures he got to run must have mysteriously appeared literally at the last minute.

Edited by garybusey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

Conservatives don't even have the balls to criticize white nationalism. 

 

Is there a more irrelevant group of folks than “white nationalists” ? 

 

Weird how this became a msm talking point lately.     Where were all these “white nationalists” the past 20 years ? 

 

Do you live in fear of them ?  All 88 of them ? ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, elroy16 said:

 

 

 

So since the CIA/FBI/Obama/Hillary/Comey/Mueller/etc are all running this deep state government, are attempting to overthrow Trump with their coup, spying on civilians, and are trying to cover it up, it's OK that the right covers up a wife beater and Trump bragged about grabbing women by the kitty or walking into pageant changing rooms? 

 

 

Do I have that right or what am I missing?

The President was talking to a shock jock in his prior career, engaging in locker room talk.  Is it a desirable?  Not to me personally, I find it to distasteful; but let's not pretend that it wasn't standard talk that lots of men engage in.  Your faux moral preening over it, equating it with sexual assault is, once again, a lie made by a low morals liberal in order to advance their agenda.  Why can't you be honest?

 

As for the "cover up of a wife beater", can you explain the cover up portion?  Do you mean "hire someone who hit their wife"?  Do you know if this person suffered prior fallout of any kind for their actions?  And again, can you please provide me with a list of actions which an individual can take which should prevent them from working ever again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there's maybe 6 white nationalists in the entire US?

 

only liberals with nothing going on in their life could even name them

 

all that stuff went down the drain when they couldn't hide behind the Democratic Party in the Jim Crow south

 

as they had for 100 years after the Civil War

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

The 600 signatures he got to run must have mysteriously appeared literally at the last minute.

You can get 600 signatures for just about anything by standing out in front of a super market for an afternoon and putting you best foot forward.  "Hi, my name is Arthur Jones, and I'm a Republican running for Congress.  Would you mind signing this to advance my candidacy?  Thank you."

 

Again, why can't you just be honest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

One is on the GOP ticket in Illinois and got 600 signatures in order to run.

 

Yeah and I'm sure he was chanting the 14 words and heil Hitler while he went around and got those signatures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

You can get 600 signatures for just about anything by standing out in front of a super market for an afternoon and putting you best foot forward.  "Hi, my name is Arthur Jones, and I'm a Republican running for Congress.  Would you mind signing this to advance my candidacy?  Thank you."

 

Again, why can't you just be honest?

You have to ask that of a liberal lemming?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

Zero conservatives on this board have criticized Arthur Jones.

 

Every conservative on this board has criticized Obama, Clinton, CNN, etc.

 

 

You're the only one who's brought him up.

 

And again, if you weren't too lazy to, you'd be able to find the grayed out names on old posts of users who came here, espoused white supremacist nonsense, were promptly mocked mercilessly and eventually banned (once Darin woke up from a nap).

Edited by LeviF91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, row_33 said:

 

Conservatives always criticize their own more than Liberals 

I do think you're correct. But, why do you think that is?

 

I mean, look at Sanders and how the DNC literally cheated him. What did he do? He capitulated to them. And, the tabloid media more than did its part in ignoring what happened (even being a large part of the cheating). It is a huge moment in political history. That said, I do think liberals criticize things of that nature. I just think the vocal ones, who we are forced to hear all the time, don't. The stereotypical TV liberals. 

 

Edited by Paulus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

I'd be interested to hear your suggestions.

 

No matter what anyone wants to think, there's no simple one off solution to the whole thing.  At the very least, while this guy is still alive, they need to learn as much from him as they possibly can.  They need to figure out how to better identify warning signs for this stuff and then react to them sooner.  I can't offer something concrete here since I don't know enough about it.  All I know is that we shouldn't look the other way simply because "it doesn't happen often".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

Zero conservatives on this board have criticized Arthur Jones.

 

Every conservative on this board has criticized Obama, Clinton, CNN, etc.

 

Let's just cut to the chase: you are an uninformed liberal asswhole that doesn't have an honest bone in his body.

Edited by 3rdnlng
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, garybusey said:

 

Zero conservatives on this board have criticized Arthur Jones.

 

Every conservative on this board has criticized Obama, Clinton, CNN, etc.

 

Arthur Jones isn't a conservative.  He's a white nationalist.  Ideologically he's a socialist who happens to be a racist.  He doesn't reflect conservative, libertarian, or Republican values; isn't being run or financed by the Republican Party, and doesn't have their support.

 

Why should conservatives welcome him into our tent in order to own him so we can criticize him?  Hell, he describes himself as a Lincolnite which I thought made him a Democrat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

Zero conservatives on this board have criticized Arthur Jones.

 

Every conservative on this board has criticized Obama, Clinton, CNN, etc.

 

 

That can be very simply explained away by one question: Who the !@#$ is Arthur Jones?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arthur Jones founded Nautilus, another plays for the Dallas Cowboys.

 

 

Maybe they should provide a list of the 6 white supremacists so they can be blanket-condemned at once.

 

oh don't bother, they are condemned without the list 24/7

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

The President was talking to a shock jock in his prior career, engaging in locker room talk.  Is it a desirable?  Not to me personally, I find it to distasteful; but let's not pretend that it wasn't standard talk that lots of men engage in.  Your faux moral preening over it, equating it with sexual assault is, once again, a lie made by a low morals liberal in order to advance their agenda.  Why can't you be honest?

 

As for the "cover up of a wife beater", can you explain the cover up portion?  Do you mean "hire someone who hit their wife"?  Do you know if this person suffered prior fallout of any kind for their actions?  And again, can you please provide me with a list of actions which an individual can take which should prevent them from working ever again?

 

 

So Trump says he goes into pageant locker rooms while they're changing and there are multiple contestants who have corroborated this. He's also said he's grabbed women by the kitty and starts kissing women without their consent. He's had 11 women come out and say he's kissed or touched them inappropriately. 

 

Quote

The Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network defines sexual assault as "unwanted sexual contact that stops short of rape or attempted rape. This includes sexual touching and fondling."

 

 

Locker room talk, you honestly believe that? And the left is the side that will believe anything they're told? 

 

 

 

 

February 8th, 2018

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5359731/Ex-wife-Rob-Porter-Trumps-secretary-tells-marriage.html

 

Quote

When reached for comment, Porter told DailyMail.com: 'I will not comment about these matters, beyond stating that many of these allegations are slanderous and simply false.' 

John Kelly, Chief of Staff, commented:  'Rob Porter is a man of true integrity and honor, and I can't say enough good things about him. He is a friend, a confidante and a trusted professional. I am proud to serve alongside him.'

 

 

http://www.cnn.com/2018/02/13/politics/christopher-wray-white-house-rob-porter/index.html

Quote

FBI Director Chris Wray upended the White House's timeline about when it learned of domestic abuse allegations leveled against disgraced aide Rob Porter.

Wray testified Tuesday that the FBI repeatedly briefed the White House on its investigation into the aide last year, despite how the White House has presented their timeline.

 

 

So the party of morality describes a wife abuser as "a man of true integrity and honor." Real classy stuff there.

 

 

 

If you're going to side with the right on their policies, fine, I can respect that. Don't talk about how the right is all moral and superior than the left, that's just a load of ****. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

Zero conservatives on this board have criticized Arthur Jones.

 

Every conservative on this board has criticized Obama, Clinton, CNN, etc.

 

 

Stay on topic, which was conservatives criticizing GOP and that happens a lot here. 

 

Why are you surprised that conservatives criticize liberals & DEMs?  Again, please show me where the self-professed liberals have criticized the DEMs.  I've been on this site since 1998, and guess what, it doesn't happen. 

 

Your posting history also proves it.  You expect conservatives to be the exact lemmings to the dogma as has been indoctrinated into the left.  But sorry, not happening, because we can think for ourselves and form our own opinion after examining the facts.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conservatives and liberals don't play in the same exact reference zones, so comparison is tough if you want it to be perfect.

 

They are close enough to make it a worthwhile attempt to compare though.

 

 

My new digital copy of The New Republic arrived, been a subscriber since around 1978, at the very least it had the best "back half" of a magazine for decades. When I show a copy to lib colleagues they think it's a far-left rag... even for Canadians...  :D

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Is Florida that white trash at the high school has a ton of 14 year olds and 19 year olds at the same school? Because I'm seeing a lot of quotes with are attributing those age ranges to the students... What the !@#$

 

I know I'm the stupidest poster here, but I lost half my brain cells trying to comprehend this sentence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, garybusey said:

 

I know I'm the stupidest poster here, but I lost half my brain cells trying to comprehend this sentence.

Yeah, that made no sense. I hope Boyst was being sarcastic or purposefully stupid. 

Edited by Paulus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Paulus said:

Yeah, that made no sense. I hope Boyst was being sarcastic or purposefully stupid. 

I was channeling my inner exiled, and I figured out how he does it. He doesn't type you just does voice to text. It Fox my **** up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

I was channeling my inner exiled, and I figured out how he does it. He doesn't type you just does voice to text. It Fox my **** up

 

it was stream of consciousness rant during a week of a tragedy, seemed fine to me...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...