Jump to content

Here you can admit that yes, it CAN get worse than Taylor


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, JM2009 said:

Crusher is upset tonight. I have yet to see him not look like a fool with his predictions and rantings. 

 

i like the part where you keep calling me crusher ???

 

My predictions are on point.    3 to 7 win bills are 3 to 7 win bills.

 

stop spamming the site

 

(crusher, xrushx, foxx) and everyone else you defame are entitled to their opinions, you're just an ass. 

Edited by Air it out Fitzy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Air it out Fitzy said:

 

i like the part where you keep calling me crusher ???

 

My predictions are on point.    3 to 7 win bills are 3 to 7 win bills.

 

stop spamming the site (crusher, xrushx, foxx) and everyone else you defame are entitled to their opinions, you're just an ass. 

Opinions are not what you and a few others are posting here. Crusade is more like it. And a nasty one. And everyone knows you are Crusher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

Of course it can get worse than Taylor, no one ever said otherwise.  The point is it can never get better than Taylor, who is by definition mediocre, unless they try someone new.  

 

In trying to find something better than mediocre they tried Peterman and he fell flat. Bummer. They need to give him another chance of course (probably not this week, but before the end of the year), but regardless of that, today was a big step toward confirming they need to draft a QB early next spring.

 

I know it drives people crazy, but there is a 3 year plan happening and it supersedes any 2017 plans.

I totally agree. At least we will get to see what we have in Peterman to see if he can be a part of the future. We need to draft a QB for the future next draft. There needs to be stability at QB. We werent going to be a good playoff team with Taylor and we wont be with Peterman either. There are glaring holes all over the team. The Oline it terrible. The DLine is marginally better. The LB's are subpar for NFL standards. Lorenzo Alexander is way past his useful prime. Twice I saw Milano try to fill the same hole as another Bills defender and the RB went through the open gap. The Bills will need better depth at WR and TE. They need to draft a RB because Shady need help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Did you watch both games?  Are you seriously trying to compare Prescott's performance and Peterman's?

 

Not at all. I’m saying we benched Tyrod for playing that bad when we had the same number of wins.

25 minutes ago, apuszczalowski said:

C'mon, Prescott has actually run a pretty good offence that's now missing one of its biggest weapons in Elliott.

 

So without a good run game he becomes a below average QB? He’s been taking sacks and turning the ball over like crazy the past 2 weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Not at all. I’m saying we benched Tyrod for playing that bad when we had the same number of wins.

 

So without a good run game he becomes a below average QB? He’s been taking sacks and turning the ball over like crazy the past 2 weeks.

The difference is that Dak has actually shown he can be a good QB in this league. And it's not like the last 2 opponents of theirs were some garbage teams either. Dak gets the benefit of having proven some stuff in the league already to have a few bad starts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, apuszczalowski said:

The difference is that Dak has actually shown he can be a good QB in this league. And it's not like the last 2 opponents of theirs were some garbage teams either. Dak gets the benefit of having proven some stuff in the league already to have a few bad starts

SO HAS TYROD

 

This is seriously insanity

 

Our offense was great last year.  Tyrod is probably in the #10-#12 range of QBs, and that is PLENTY good enough to win with.  He'll never be a Brady.  Few QBs are.

 

The best part about committing to a QB of the caliber of Tyrod Taylor is that you have free reign to take flyers on guys until you hit on one that you think can be a top 5 guy, and there's simultaneously no pressure to play the new prospect but also no big shock or surprise when you finally part ways with the vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, apuszczalowski said:

The difference is that Dak has actually shown he can be a good QB in this league. And it's not like the last 2 opponents of theirs were some garbage teams either. Dak gets the benefit of having proven some stuff in the league already to have a few bad starts

Yeah, Tyrod had the team 7th in points before benching last year so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HappyDays said:

Dak Prescott has 86 yards, 2 picks, and a fumble returned for a TD tonight. After a promising 5-3 start they will now fall to 5-5.

 

Anyone here think Prescott should get benched?

 

Prescott is really just the example of the tier 2 QBs that I'd put Taylor in.

 

Wrong circumstances - He'll be bad

 

Decent circumstances - He'll look like an NFL starter 

 

Great to ideal circumstances - He'll look like a pro bowler and can lead a team on a playoff run

 

 

The moment you knew Zeke was going to miss games was the moment you had to know Dak would take a big step back.

 

Same with Matt Ryan when Shanahan left.

 

Hey, how's everyone's favorite 2016 QB Derek Carr doing?

 

What's up with Mariota?

 

 

Too bad in today's world we're seriously victims of the moment and have the memories of goldfish.

 

We can and should be trying to upgrade actively on Taylor, but he's fine until we're able to do that, which I assume will be next draft.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Taylor needed to be shaken to react from the two horribles past weeks  at least thats the way looked to me. The Taylor of this week it seems different from past and not only in field.

(And i still dislike him as QB)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

2 of Tyrod’s 3 picks went right through Clay’s hands. Is it 4-1 then in picks? Maybe the OL has allowed pressure the whole year but Tyrod escapes it and keeps plays alive? I’m just thinking out loud but that’s what it looked like to me.

 

This team was the exact same today but their shortcomings got exposed. They want to throw these stupid WC routes with no threat over the top. Guess what happened? They jumped the routes and picked that stiff 5 times in a half!! That’s not a surprise. It’s a disgrace. That falls on the coaching staff.

No way Kirbs! Our OL is great! Haven't you seen Tyrod's time to throw?

 

:sick:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

unless Taylor is playing...

 

amiright? :flirt:

 

Taylor doesn't turn the ball over. That's what he's good at. Instead, he results in punts (except for his fumble-touchdown yesterday). 

 

And when the defense is playing as poorly as it is, there's little-to-no difference between throwing an interception and punting the ball to the opponent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last three games, all blowouts, Taylor started 2, Peterman 1.

 

Is there any difference if your getting blown out and your offense cant stay on the field?

 

Good thing the bills traded back in the first round instead of taking a QB, we have that cornerstone DB in Tre White though. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, joesixpack said:

He was terrible, that much is indisputable.

 

The problem is, the other guy sucks donkey balls in the OPPOSITE direction. Our choices today are : guy who won't take chances and a guy who hasn't seen a chance he wouldn't like to take.

 

Tyrod does not suck. He literally has masked this teams offensive shortcomings this entire season. He had a clunker of a game against the Saints, it happens. But you need to give up this narrative that he flat out "Sucks". Jamarcus Russell sucked. Brian Brohm sucked. Brady Quinn sucked. Jimmy Clausen sucked. Tyrod is not on that level. Average? Sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rad Likes The Bills said:

Tyrod does not suck. He literally has masked this teams offensive shortcomings this entire season. He had a clunker of a game against the Saints, it happens. But you need to give up this narrative that he flat out "Sucks". Jamarcus Russell sucked. Brian Brohm sucked. Brady Quinn sucked. Jimmy Clausen sucked. Tyrod is not on that level. Average? Sure

 

*bangs head on desk*

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, JM2009 said:

Opinions are not what you and a few others are posting here. Crusade is more like it. And a nasty one. And everyone knows you are Crusher.

Internet bullying is bad.      You are crusher 

7 hours ago, Avisan said:

SO HAS TYROD

 

This is seriously insanity

 

Our offense was great last year.  Tyrod is probably in the #10-#12 range of QBs, and that is PLENTY good enough to win with.  He'll never be a Brady.  Few QBs are.

 

The best part about committing to a QB of the caliber of Tyrod Taylor is that you have free reign to take flyers on guys until you hit on one that you think can be a top 5 guy, and there's simultaneously no pressure to play the new prospect but also no big shock or surprise when you finally part ways with the vet.

18-25 you mean

25 minutes ago, Rad Likes The Bills said:

Tyrod does not suck. He literally has masked this teams offensive shortcomings this entire season. He had a clunker of a game against the Saints, it happens. But you need to give up this narrative that he flat out "Sucks". Jamarcus Russell sucked. Brian Brohm sucked. Brady Quinn sucked. Jimmy Clausen sucked. Tyrod is not on that level. Average? Sure

 

He sucks.     It's pretty official.   

Edited by Air it out Fitzy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

Most interceptions in a half since 1991.

 

That was sickening.

 

And shocking.

 

I legitimately thought Peterman would come in and play well.

 

Right now he looks like Jeff Tuel 2.0... worse actually.

 

 

Too many posters here saying our passing game couldn't get any worse.

 

Come eat some crow. 0:)

 

 

At least he was awful enough that we can quickly go back to Taylor and try for a playoff run in our super weak conference :thumbsup:

Yes it can

 

AND 

 

It can get a whole lot better.  :thumbsup:

 

Ah the lovely crusade word from the Caped Crusader himself jm2009

 

11 hours ago, Wayne Arnold said:

 

The difference between the two is that Peterman is already throwing by the time Mills' man is crushing him. Taylor holds the ball too long to be throwing by then. 

How can people "pretend" the outcome would have changed with Taylor.  

 

He'd have been sacked on those same plays Nate got hit.  

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew this would happen though. Peteraman is bad, the board would overreact, Peterman was good, the board would overreact.

 

Taylor is not a top 10-12 QB in this league all of the sudden because Peterman was bad.

the Bills needs to do better and continue to search until they have the guy in place.

 

For those saying you can win with Taylor, well, why aren't the Bills "Winning with Taylor"?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CountDorkula said:

I knew this would happen though. Peteraman is bad, the board would overreact, Peterman was good, the board would overreact.

 

Taylor is not a top 10-12 QB in this league all of the sudden because Peterman was bad.

the Bills needs to do better and continue to search until they have the guy in place.

 

For those saying you can win with Taylor, well, why aren't the Bills "Winning with Taylor"?

 

 

He has a winning record this year and in his Bills career. They are actually winning with him. I think what yesterday showed is that they haven’t been winning “despite” him as some on here have claimed. They’ve won “because” of him in a lot of cases. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kirby Jackson said:

He has a winning record this year and in his Bills career. They are actually winning with him. I think what yesterday showed is that they haven’t been winning “despite” him as some on here have claimed. They’ve won “because” of him in a lot of cases. 

I disagree with this completely. They were winning earlier this year because the defense was playing out of its mind.  

 

the defense has come crashing back down to earth, and you are losing.

 

You win with Taylor if everything else is perfect, we need better than that. 

 

Yesterday showed nothing, Yesterday was an all time bad performance by a QB who was not ready for the big stage and the coach needs to answer for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...