Deranged Rhino Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/LeeSmithDC/status/1209140264406790147 https://mobile.twitter.com/GOPLeader/status/1208818029578137602 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Ah the NYT ... spinning, spinning, always spinning... They do not state in this article that the reason Durham released a statement because the media was trying to create a false narrative on what the Horowitz report found. Just because the OIG found "no bias" (because no one confessed to him or wrote down "I have bias") and stated that an inquiry has a very low bar to be opened, that does not mean things were a-ok. Shesh Quite the opposite when everyone named in the Horowitz report was handed over to Durham. The whole article smacked Durham around for daring to cut off the DNC and "msm" (BIRM) narrative in its tracks. In the final third of the article (of course, after the lede and introductory paragraphs ) lists his background, his straight-shooter status, his legal wins, etc. Durham Surprises Even Allies With Statement on F.B.I.’s Trump CaseThe federal prosecutor leading a review of the origins of the Russia inquiry has a reputation for keeping his mouth shut. At a sensitive moment, he didn’t. Mr. Horowitz had found that the F.B.I. acted appropriately in opening the inquiry in 2016 into whether the Trump campaign wittingly or unwittingly helped Russia influence the election in Donald J. Trump’s favor. In response, Mr. Durham, whose report is not expected to be complete for months, released a caveat-laden rebuttal: “Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the inspector general that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the F.B.I. case was opened.” </snip> The inspector general’s report makes no substantive reference to Mr. Durham’s investigation. But before the report’s release, Mr. Durham got into a sharp dispute with Mr. Horowitz’s team over a footnote in a draft of the report that seemed to imply that Mr. Durham agreed with all of Mr. Horowitz’s conclusions, which he did not, according to people familiar with the matter. The footnote did not appear in the final version of the report. </snip> The potential explosiveness of Mr. Durham’s mission was further underscored by the disclosure that he was examining the role of John O. Brennan, the former C.I.A. director, in how the intelligence community assessed Russia’s 2016 election interference. </snip> Edited December 23, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 5 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Ah the NYT ... spinning, spinning, always spinning... They do not state in this article that the reason Durham released a statement because the media was trying to create a false narrative on what the Horowitz report found. Just because the OIG found "no bias" (because no one confessed to him or wrote down "I have bias") and stated that an inquiry has a very low bar to be opened, that does not mean things were a-ok. Shesh Quite the opposite when everyone named in the Horowitz report was handed over to Durham. The whole article smacked Durham around for daring to cut off the DNC and "msm" (BIRM) narrative in its tracks. In the final third of the article (of course, after the lede and introductory paragraphs ) lists his background, his straight-shooter status, his legal wins, etc. Durham Surprises Even Allies With Statement on F.B.I.’s Trump CaseThe federal prosecutor leading a review of the origins of the Russia inquiry has a reputation for keeping his mouth shut. At a sensitive moment, he didn’t. Mr. Horowitz had found that the F.B.I. acted appropriately in opening the inquiry in 2016 into whether the Trump campaign wittingly or unwittingly helped Russia influence the election in Donald J. Trump’s favor. In response, Mr. Durham, whose report is not expected to be complete for months, released a caveat-laden rebuttal: “Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the inspector general that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the F.B.I. case was opened.” </snip> The inspector general’s report makes no substantive reference to Mr. Durham’s investigation. But before the report’s release, Mr. Durham got into a sharp dispute with Mr. Horowitz’s team over a footnote in a draft of the report that seemed to imply that Mr. Durham agreed with all of Mr. Horowitz’s conclusions, which he did not, according to people familiar with the matter. The footnote did not appear in the final version of the report. </snip> The potential explosiveness of Mr. Durham’s mission was further underscored by the disclosure that he was examining the role of John O. Brennan, the former C.I.A. director, in how the intelligence community assessed Russia’s 2016 election interference. </snip> Speaking of burying the lede... Quote whether the Trump campaign wittingly or unwittingly helped Russia influence the election Is that the first time the Times has admitted the possibility that the Trump campaign didn't collude with Russia? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 11 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Speaking of burying the lede... Is that the first time the Times has admitted the possibility that the Trump campaign didn't collude with Russia? despite all the twitterverse claiming the Times is spinning here, i see very little in this article that does not speak to Durham being anything other than what his reputation says he is. tough, hardnosed and above all, fair. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1209222969182097409 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 18 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Hmmmm but I thought that the FBI acted appropriately? 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 25, 2019 Share Posted December 25, 2019 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fisa-courts-review-leaves-out-key-players.amp?__twitter_impression=true ***** Ive called it the swampiest committee on the Hill for a reason — and Rubio has always been part of the establishment “team”. Absolutely compromised. https://mobile.twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1209635699357634561 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 25, 2019 Share Posted December 25, 2019 This happened while I was on the road. Apologies if it’s been covered : https://mobile.twitter.com/wendyp4545/status/1208418159071498247 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 25, 2019 Share Posted December 25, 2019 19 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: This happened while I was on the road. Apologies if it’s been covered : https://mobile.twitter.com/wendyp4545/status/1208418159071498247 People have gone back and forth the last few years wondering if she was in on it. Her retirement at this time is "curious," to say the least. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 26, 2019 Share Posted December 26, 2019 Always doing what’s best for himself at the expense of the country. His legacy will be ash soon. And it will be entirely deserved. https://mobile.twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1210272032899969024 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 26, 2019 Share Posted December 26, 2019 37 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Always doing what’s best for himself at the expense of the country. His legacy will be ash soon. And it will be entirely deserved. https://mobile.twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1210272032899969024 https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1210279228555616257 https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1210279845919412230 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 26, 2019 Share Posted December 26, 2019 On 12/24/2019 at 9:23 PM, Buffalo_Gal said: People have gone back and forth the last few years wondering if she was in on it. Her retirement at this time is "curious," to say the least. ...garnish her pension.......... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 26, 2019 Share Posted December 26, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/carterwpage/status/1210313880737443841 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 20 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://mobile.twitter.com/carterwpage/status/1210313880737443841 What a self-serving arrogant c#ckknocker Brokaw is. “I hope we all learned a lesson” followed by some self-serving bs about the Jewel family being paid off? The only lesson to be learned is that after he ruined RJs life, Brokaw went on to enjoy an embarrassment of riches while RJ was driven to an early grave. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 On 12/24/2019 at 8:51 PM, Deranged Rhino said: ***** Ive called it the swampiest committee on the Hill for a reason — and Rubio has always been part of the establishment “team”. Absolutely compromised. https://mobile.twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1209635699357634561 Interesting... vellly in-ta-rest-inngk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 6 minutes ago, Nanker said: Interesting... vellly in-ta-rest-inngk Well, it shows Marco Rubio's face, so Twitter has a point... 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 1 hour ago, Hedge said: But McCain's a deceased war hero, therefore #OrangeManBad. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 29, 2019 Share Posted December 29, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/AKA_RealDirty/status/1211084561658109952 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 29, 2019 Share Posted December 29, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/RepStevenSmith/status/1211395033766739974 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 Correct. https://mobile.twitter.com/actual_chaos/status/1211447539129573377 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Correct. https://mobile.twitter.com/actual_chaos/status/1211447539129573377 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 https://twitter.com/AKA_RealDirty/status/1211771186067202048 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 3, 2020 Share Posted January 3, 2020 Appeals court wrestles with Mueller evidence, Trump aide's testimony ... Some of the sharpest exchanges came amid questioning by judges on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals over whether the courts should wade into such a politically charged debate, or if Congress and the White House should be left to resolve the disputes on their own. “The question is whether the Constitution allows you to pull the courts in,” Judge Thomas Griffith, a George W. Bush appointee, told an attorney for the House Judiciary Committee in the McGahn case, noting instances where the feuding branches “duked it out” through the political process. Griffith and Judge Judith Rogers, a Clinton appointee, were assigned to hear both cases. Karen Henderson, a George H.W. Bush appointee, rounded out the three-judge panel in the McGahn case, and Judge Neomi Rao, a Trump appointee, joined the panel in the Mueller case. ... 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 Don't forget - Flynn plead guilty 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: What does Comrade Fudge have to say, though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 I've lost count, how many of this president's men have been convicted and/or sent to jail now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I've lost count, how many of this president's men have been convicted of process crimes in an illegal/corrupt FISA investigation of a political opponents campaign under the falsified premise of Russian Collusion, and/or sent to jail now? Fixed for the truth 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Funny that this should come after Soleimani's assassination. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: ... https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1214615690512130048 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 +more 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 8, 2020 Share Posted January 8, 2020 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 9, 2020 Share Posted January 9, 2020 Funny that. https://mobile.twitter.com/RealSLokhova/status/1215061334125154305 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 He's not a spy. He's a smear merchant for hire by spooks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 Thread. 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 16 minutes ago, Hedge said: Thread. It is almost as if the FISC and the FBI are in cahoots. Nawwwww we don’t have a rubber stamping secret court in the US. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 8 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: It is almost as if the FISC and the FBI are in cahoots. Nawwwww we don’t have a rubber stamping secret court in the US. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 On 1/11/2020 at 10:44 PM, Hedge said: Thread. Makes sense if the judges were in on it from the beginning. I've always believed they were, that the evidence provided and lack of additional evidence presented for the renewals would have been questioned more vigorously by judges in this position. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts