Jump to content

DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ~Kostabi~ said:

The "law and order" candidate strikes again.

Of course, he's really only the "law and order" candidate for uppity minorities, not for himself and his cabal of criminal buddies.

Typical right-wing authoritarian bull****. His idiot supporters will applaud it.

Sane America will be even more enthusiastic to vote him out in November.

 

Right-wingers are going to suffer for this.

They thought it would be super funny to elect an internet troll president and "own the libs" and look where it's gotten them.

An out of control pandemic, an economy in free fall, and racial/civil unrest. I hope they're sick of winning already.
 

image.jpeg.7179e90a7bdf2c74db8e1ea781101ed9.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Cinga said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SO basically, for the last 3 pages none of you added anything to the conversation, again... 

 

Been  lot of stroking yourselves so I'll leave you with this.....

 


giphy.gif?cid=4d1e4f29c2431d90b209f6ff18

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

 

LOL.............

 

Senator Graham offers a straightforward explanation of why he thinks Stone's pardon could be justified.

 

and how does a liberal respond ?

 

By calling him a piece of sh*t.

 

 

How typical, no variation from the narrative is allowed.

 

 

Liberal Fascism.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

LOL.............

 

Senator Graham offers a straightforward explanation of why he thinks Stone's pardon could be justified.

 

and how does a liberal respond ?

 

By calling him a piece of sh*t.

 

 

How typical, no variation from the narrative is allowed.

 

 

Liberal Fascism.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Say it like you mean it, Claire.

She should be so intemperate when she’s on NBC. They’d get better ratings.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

Funny how the left is schitting the bed about Stone, but nary a one is concerned with CA releasing 8000 prisoners because of Covid.

 

 


They are trying to make it something. No corrupt Mueller (Weissmann) investigated predicated on nothing, no early morning raid with CNN cameras, no arrest, no prosecution, no conviction for Stone.


If Stone wins on appeal (which he very well could), it will be ignored.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Crayola64 said:


I like that you wake up everyday, find this tweet, and spam the forum with it.  Do you ever wonder  how your life came to get this way?

Probably because Obama was the most corrupt President in the US.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bdutton said:

Probably because Obama was the most corrupt President in the US.


no one besides a fringe part of the internet and racists believe that.  I don’t think anyone here falls in the second category.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said:

 

...Andy sheds his skin faster than any other amphibian on the planet......he's Sleepy Bob's poster boy for the partisan witch hunt.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:


I like that you wake up everyday, find this tweet, and spam the forum with it.  Do you ever wonder  how your life came to get this way?

 This is rich. Lol. Did you ever consider that's exactly the point? You are your ilk spam the board every single day with your BS.

 

I'm just playing by the lefts rules here. Under those rules, it's your obligation to prove that Obama was not in fact the most corrupt President in US history.  

Edited by BillsFanNC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:

 This is rich. Lol. Did you ever consider that's exactly the point? You are your ilk spam the board every single day with your BS.

 

I'm just playing by the kefts rules here. Under those rules, it's your obligation to prove that Obama was not in fact the most corrupt President in US history.  

 

 

...Eric Holder does NOT approve of your message...............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 This is rich. Lol. Did you ever consider that's exactly the point? You are your ilk spam the board every single day with your BS.

 

I'm just playing by the lefts rules here. Under those rules, it's your obligation to prove that Obama was not in fact the most corrupt President in US history.  


It is a daily reminder. So, you post it, er, daily. No idea what the issue is. The Obama administration was the most corrupt ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


It is a daily reminder. So, you post it, er, daily. No idea what the issue is. The Obama administration was the most corrupt ever.

 

Absolutely and there's mountains of evidence to support this opinion that the left conveniently ignores. As easy as it has been for them to ignore all the evidence, you'd think it would be even easier for them to ignore the daily reminder.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Absolutely and there's mountains of evidence to support this opinion that the left conveniently ignores. As easy as it has been for them to ignore all the evidence, you'd think it would be even easier for them to ignore the daily reminder.

 

 

 

...name another administration is US history that was complicit in laying the ground work to overthrow a duly elected, incoming President.....

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 This is rich. Lol. Did you ever consider that's exactly the point? You are your ilk spam the board every single day with your BS.

 

I'm just playing by the lefts rules here. Under those rules, it's your obligation to prove that Obama was not in fact the most corrupt President in US history.  

 

A person is innocent  until proven guilty. Let Barr charge him with crimes , if found guilty put him in prison. Same goes for any politician who breaks the law. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ALF said:

 

A person is innocent  until proven guilty. Let Barr charge him with crimes , if found guilty put him in prison. Same goes for any politician who breaks the law. 

 

...SERIOUSLY?.....when...where....who...um....er...oh....uh....well....."think you've been watching too many Perry Mason reruns lately."....Della said so...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ALF said:

 

A person is innocent  until proven guilty. Let Barr charge him with crimes , if found guilty put him in prison. Same goes for any politician who breaks the law. 

 

Let's hope we get back to a justice system applied equally to everyone. 

 

But I'm talking about the lefts rules in the court of public/media opinion. In that sphere, Trump and anyone associated with him is guilty first and the burden is on them to prove that they're not. Im simply applying the same standard to Obama, if you believe that he's not the most corrupt President ever, then let's see the evidence.. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ALF said:

 

A person is innocent  until proven guilty. Let Barr charge him with crimes , if found guilty put him in prison. Same goes for any politician who breaks the law. 


This is true, people are innocent until proven guilty.

It is the same as "most popular" or "greatest" etc., etc. The "most corrupt" is decided upon by each individual's knowledge (history books, newspaper reporting, etc) and perception of an administration since presidents are not going to be indicted or arrested to be found guilty of anything.  Many people decide based on the historical documents of the administration. Normally, those documents are locked up for a while so it is difficult to judge a recent administration. We are simply fortunate to be able to see the declassified documents of the Obama administration to get an idea of how that administration was run - especially since the press was reluctant to report truthfully on the misdeeds of that particular administration.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Crayola64 said:


I like that you wake up everyday, find this tweet, and spam the forum with it.  Do you ever wonder  how your life came to get this way?

Freedom of speech is a powerful thing to those who despise it.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


This is true, people are innocent until proven guilty.

It is the same as "most popular" or "greatest" etc., etc. The "most corrupt" is decided upon by each individual's knowledge (history books, newspaper reporting, etc) and perception of an administration since presidents are not going to be indicted or arrested to be found guilty of anything.  Many people decide based on the historical documents of the administration. Normally, those documents are locked up for a while so it is difficult to judge a recent administration. We are simply fortunate to be able to see the declassified documents of the Obama administration to get an idea of how that administration was run - especially since the press was reluctant to report truthfully on the misdeeds of that particular administration.

 

 

 

...uh oh....azz backward......good 'ol Trump is guilty until proven innocent and if, IF so, APPEAL like hell........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...