Jump to content

DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal


Recommended Posts

Start: Trump committed treason by colluding with Russia!

 

 

 

Finish: I think we might be able to twist the arm of an elderly guy who believes the moon landing was fake to plea to perjury because he forgot an email from 2 years before though he admitted it when we reminded him of it.

 

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

 

And POTUS went on a tweet storm, including an interesting meme retweet (last image): 

 

 

 

Just a jab? Or a sign of what's to come?

Just trolling. Nothing's is gonna happen. Republicans are pussies and they'll chicken out and only try to use this as a method to keep Dems in check as the liberals push more and more left to make America like Brazil or Columbia 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Just trolling. Nothing's is gonna happen. Republicans are pussies and they'll chicken out and only try to use this as a method to keep Dems in check as the liberals push more and more left to make America like Brazil or Columbia 

 

Maybe. 

 

The midterms didn't end until last night. (three weeks late). 

 

Now, with no elections in sight for the time being, expect action from Mueller and/or Trump's team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Maybe. 

 

The midterms didn't end until last night. (three weeks late). 

 

Now, with no elections in sight for the time being, expect action from Mueller and/or Trump's team. 

With every week, this field goal is getting much longer to make

 

Which would have just been a PAT six months ago has turned in to a game-winning 56 yard field goal with wind, rain, and 43 players on defense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MORE TO THE MANAFORT STORY: Referred to here, it turns out that The Guardian somewhat backpedaled on their “blockbuster” story by making “stealth corrections” and changing some of the factual assertions without telling readers. The current page carries no trashline, update or editor’s note telling the readers they made changes 3 times, according to correction tracker Newssniffer.

 

“Stealth” corrections are widely considered dishonest and unethical. Even The New York Times has said so. The Online News Association has gone as far as to say:

“Preventing mistakes is of huge importance, but so too is setting the stage to correct them quickly and fully by taking advantage of the networked news environment. Doing so not only meets our obligations to the public, but can, in fact, build trust and help us feel better about our work as journalists. Bottom line: Corrections are important.”

 

 

.

 
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GG said:

Sounds like a guy who would like Communism.  

 

Note that when he says "You remind me of how many corrupt authoritarian leaders abroad behaved"

1) he doesn't actually say that's a bad thing, and

2) The CIA installed a lot of those leaders.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First the start date of the FBI investigation was October '16. Then, when they got caught in that lie, it was pushed back to July without anyone in the media or "resistance" wondering why. 

 

Now... that date will be pushed back again. Getting closer and closer to March/April '16 when Adm Rogers ordered the 702 audit... because of course that was the true beginning of the whole cover up/frame up. It was designed to deflect and hide illegal spying activities by the former administration which began LONG before the '16 election, and spied on more Americans than just Trump's campaign team. 

 

 

 

Facts are stubborn things. They just don't go away even after the media lies about them for two years

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No one cares, apparently, Britain's flagship paper published a blatantly false story yesterday - then stealth edited it to make it look less damning. Instead, the WaPo decides to double down on it... because the WaPo, like the Guardian, is a compromised media outlet who works for the IC and not their readers.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

https://nypost.com/2018/11/28/trump-threatens-to-declassify-devastating-docs-about-democrats/

 

(can't be used as a bartering chip... still don't think it will be)

as i opined previously, this whole thing could just be a ploy to keep the other side at bay. no one is going to do anything so stupid as to drain the swamp. the dog and pony show will go marching on.

man i hope'm wrong....

Edited by Foxx
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaand now we are back to Cohen/Sater and pretending he's a Russian asset rather than the truth- he's a US intelligence asset (Lynch) and the deal in question never left the discussion phase, and never involved 45. 

 

They  will spin this story hard but it's bull. Like  Prague. 

https://mobile.twitter.com/jonkarl/status/1068147459396853760

 

(Not just a problem for Trump associates... Comey, Strzok, Page, McCabe all lied to congress)https://mobile.twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1068154035088306178

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

 

The Moscow Project also has enumerated dozens of contacts between Kremlin figures and the Trump campaign:

By the end of June, at least eight individuals involved with the Trump campaign — George Papadopoulos, then-Sen. Jeff Sessions, Michael Cohen, Jared Kushner, Paul Manafort, Donald Trump Jr., Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, and Rick Dearborn — reportedly had contacts or meetings with at least 13 Kremlin-linked individuals: Joseph Mifsud, the “Female Russian National,” Ivan Timofeev, Sergey Kislyak, Felix Sater, Rob Goldstone, Natalia Veselnitskaya, Rinat Akhmetshin, Irakly Kaveladze, Konstantin Kilimnik, Aleksander Torshin, Vladimir Putin, the individual who emailed Rick Dearborn, and, potentially, Oleg Deripaska. Though it is unknown how directly each individual was engaged in the Kremlin’s effort to support [President] Trump, both the number of meetings and contact and the high level of many of the participants on both sides offer key evidence of the two campaigns’ willingness to collude.

 

 

Nothing to see here, lol. Mueller sifting through this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I'll say it again, as I just heard the spin during my commute:


Sater does NOT = Russian intelligence. He's "Russian born" but was an FBI informant (for organized crime) and worked for Lynch's DOJ for several years. Cohen and Sater leads back to Lynch and 44's administration, not Putin. 

 

My read is Cohen lied originally because he's wrapped up in organized crime, as is/was Sater, and that's what he was trying to obscure. By making him cop a new plea, Mueller gets to control the news cycle for the next day or so as people say, "more Trump team lies!" while no one goes deeper to see what it's really about. 

 

Here's the plea: 

https://www.justice.gov/file/1115566/download

 

Link to other documents (top of page)

https://www.justice.gov/sco

 

(individual 2 in the plea = Sater... more than likely)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Michael Cohen, a former personal attorney to President Trump, pleaded guilty Thursday in New York to lying to Congress about a Moscow real estate project that Trump and his company pursued during the months he was running for president.

 

Oh ya, nothing to see here...

 

 

Quote

 

In a nine-page filing, prosecutors laid out a litany of lies that Cohen admitted he told to congressional lawmakers about the Moscow project — an attempt, Cohen said, to minimize links between the proposed development and Trump as his presidential bid was taking off.

Cohen falsely said efforts to build a Trump-branded tower in Moscow ended in January 2016, when in fact discussions continued through that year, the filing said. Among the people Cohen briefed on the status of the project was Trump himself, on more than three occasions, according to the document.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

It does?? How so? 

 

The deal never came together, thus - regardless of when the negotiations were happening, there was no deal.

 

Read Cohen's plea. He said he stopped talking with Sater about the deal in January of 16, now he says it was in June of 16, but the deal never materialized regardless. Meaning, Trump has no deals in Russia and never has. 

 

 

 

(2:1)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, peace out said:

Someone as smart as you should know neither of these things are mutually exclusive.

 

They are when you insert the timeline told to us by Comey's FBI. 

 

They didn't know anything about it until Steele's dossier, per Comey's testimony. Then suddenly everyone in every IC outfit in the world knew. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...