YoloinOhio Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 Frowns going for the record worlds largest collection of back up QBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 All these reports need to be taken with giant grains of salt. That said, I'd trade Taylor in a second. It seems insane that Cleveland would trade a high pick for him though. I could see a third round pick for Taylor. He is a servicable starting QB and a valuable player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwight in philly Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 no.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiltonWaddams Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 I dunno...I saw how their GM fleeced the Seahawks for Bo Callahan........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zonabb Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 I'll believe these rumors, like all rumors, one a legit journalist (oxy moron) puts a name to a quote stating such. Otherwise, it's garbage, no team would trade a top pick for a QB like TT, whose team mind you HAS NOT stood behind him. So the Bills, in their infinite wisdom have told all teams he's not their guy simply by letting this dangle on and on. So Cleveland's interest is not to trade a top pick for him, but in acquiring him when the Bills pass. What team would move a top pick for him when the Bills appear likely to dump him? Such stupid reporting it's mind-boggling. I've got an 87 Escort with an expiring registration. I am undecided if I want plan to renew it but if you want to swap with me for your 2017 BMW, I'll totally do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 The only trade bait as far as Tyrod goes is if the other team likes his contract. If Whaley gets anything for Tyrod I'll be stoked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GETTOTHE50 Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 please take him cleveland. who do they want to trade? picks? Ill take em. id even trade him and carpenter for parkey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSOL Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 I'll believe these rumors, like all rumors, one a legit journalist (oxy moron) puts a name to a quote stating such. Otherwise, it's garbage, no team would trade a top pick for a QB like TT, whose team mind you HAS NOT stood behind him. So the Bills, in their infinite wisdom have told all teams he's not their guy simply by letting this dangle on and on. So Cleveland's interest is not to trade a top pick for him, but in acquiring him when the Bills pass. What team would move a top pick for him when the Bills appear likely to dump him? Such stupid reporting it's mind-boggling. I've got an 87 Escort with an expiring registration. I am undecided if I want plan to renew it but if you want to swap with me for your 2017 BMW, I'll totally do it. An '87 Escort? How the hell do you keep that thing running? Oh yeah, hell yeah id dump Tyrod for 33rd overall. Pick up Siemien and im sure we could squeak out 7-8 wins with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 Frowns going for the record worlds largest collection of back up QBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 The only trade bait as far as Tyrod goes is if the other team likes his contract. If Whaley gets anything for Tyrod I'll be stoked.the Browns will be forced to get to the salary cap floor somehow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Nails Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 The source is, wait for it, wait for it... LaCONjecture It says nothing about a trade in his article, only that they would be in on him if he was a FA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 I could see a third round pick for Taylor. He is a servicable starting QB and a valuable player I'd take that too, those are the money picks, just ask the Pats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 So they are not after Cardale? Wait a minute.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GETTOTHE50 Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 but why does cleveland want him? tyrod absolutely sucked against the AFC north last year, even with the leagues best running game LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cage Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 Would you trade Tyrod's Option to Cleveland for the 33rd overall pick? Tyrod plus our 2nd rounder for their #12 Then I'm picking Watson and WR Williams or Davis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machine gun kelly Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 They would never give up their top pick but I could see th 33rd, but would strong arm for Prior. Whoev r we chose in the draft would have Prior, Sammy and whoever else we draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Moulds on my A** Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 Why wouldn't Cleveland just wait until we cut him? This was just written in Bleacher, the report says their interest is in Tyrod as a FA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GETTOTHE50 Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 They would never give up their top pick but I could see th 33rd, but would strong arm for Prior. Whoev r we chose in the draft would have Prior, Sammy and whoever else we draft. come on man, no way they are trading pryor for tyrod. tyrod would have no one to overthrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 (edited) I'm starting to believe a decision on a Tyrod hasn't been made yet is because Whaley wants to see if he can trade him before he's released. I find it hard to believe they don't have their evaluation complete at this point and if they wanted to keep him they likely would have already. I'd take whatever I could get for him if the plan is to get rid of him. Edited March 5, 2017 by Bangarang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted March 5, 2017 Share Posted March 5, 2017 I dunno...I saw how their GM fleeced the Seahawks for Bo Callahan........ The most competent GM they've had since reentering the league. We should hire him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts