Liberal Protests

[B-Man]

Trump is right, antifa are terrorists; they always were

Washington Examiner, by Editorial

 

Original Article

 

The term “anti-fascist” began as a lie. It remains a lie today.

 

Clueless commentators, ignorant of its history, have been known to refer to the "antifa" movement as “strictly principled anti-fascists,” or a group that “protests fascism.” In fact, this is a movement of violent extremists whose philosophy traces back to the early 20th century.

 

The riots now raging in U.S. cities are not about police misconduct. They haven’t been for many days. The senseless and callous police killing of George Floyd inspired peaceful protests at first, but now it has become an excuse for a troupe of professional revolutionaries and marauders. They use these incidents in order to flex their muscle

 

 

 

[dubs]

2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Hoax. 

 

Yeah sure that’s it.  The nation is burning and the guy in the Oval Office twiddles his thumbs.  But the left is the only side that is failing us.  Whatevs. 

 

It's not even the void in leadership, it's the people that get fooled into being useful idiots and allow the void to exist.  Take SectionC, Tibs, Gary, and the rest of these clowns.  They ignore every single piece of data and any event that happened before Trump got in office and instead are told to believe that one thing and one thing only is the cause of every issue in this country, Trump.  They are an embarrassment to human evolution.

 

 

[billsfan1959]

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

Trump is right, antifa are terrorists; they always were

Washington Examiner, by Editorial

 

Original Article

 

The term “anti-fascist” began as a lie. It remains a lie today.

 

Clueless commentators, ignorant of its history, have been known to refer to the "antifa" movement as “strictly principled anti-fascists,” or a group that “protests fascism.” In fact, this is a movement of violent extremists whose philosophy traces back to the early 20th century.

 

The riots now raging in U.S. cities are not about police misconduct. They haven’t been for many days. The senseless and callous police killing of George Floyd inspired peaceful protests at first, but now it has become an excuse for a troupe of professional revolutionaries and marauders. They use these incidents in order to flex their muscle

 

This is true. However, people also can't lose site of the fact that there is an equal share of blame to the common criminals we see in video after video. Not all the violence is agitated by ANTIFA and like minded people. 

[B-Man]

'Institutional racism’ is the new blood libel

by Seth Grossman

 

Original Article

 

The riots that began in Minneapolis are the intended consequence of the fake history dished out by our media, Hollywood, and most colleges and public schools for the past 50 years.

 

This new “institutional racism” falsely blames all whites for every injustice -- especially whites who are Christian, Republican or who love America.

 

These whites are the new Jews. Minneapolis is the new Kishinev. In 1903, Kishinev was part of Russia and ruled by an emperor, the Czar. Just before Easter, a non-Jewish girl there was depressed and swallowed poison.

 

 

Much more at the link:

 

 

[Tiberius]

11 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

I hate to say it, but that’s where we’re headed.  I don’t care if someone votes Democrat or Republican or something else.  I do care if they vote for Trump.  He is a disgrace to democracy. 

He is as an avoid opponent of democracy as we have ever had in that office. I hate it when people try and say "The people put him in office.." Ummm, no, the anti-democratic EC did. No mandate from the people of this country. 

[B-Man]

 

At Least Five Police Officers Reportedly Shot, One On Life Support As Rioters And Law Enforcement Battle Across The Country.

 

 

 

Former Antifa member says group’s acts are ‘very definition of domestic terrorism.’

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[billsfan1959]

1 minute ago, dubs said:

 

It's not even the void in leadership, it's the people that get fooled into being useful idiots and allow the void to exist.  Take SectionC, Tibs, Gary, and the rest of these clowns.  They ignore every single piece of data and any event that happened before Trump got in office and instead are told to believe that one thing and one thing only is the cause of every issue in this country, Trump.  They are an embarrassment to human evolution.

 

It was one thing to see the partisan effort to single Trump out for blame on everything regarding the coronavirus. However, in the midst of criminals looting, vandalizing, setting fires, destroying communities, assulting, and killing, to see people fixated on Trump is beyond sad....

[B-Man]

Just now, billsfan1959 said:

 

It was one thing to see the partisan effort to single Trump out for blame on everything regarding the coronavirus. However, in the midst of criminals looting, vandalizing, setting fires, destroying communities, assulting, and killing, to see people fixated on Trump is beyond sad....

 

 

IT’S ALL TRUMP’S FAULT:

 

You’ve heard the definition of insanity is “doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result.”

Here’s the definition of political insanity, as demonstrated daily by American progressives: “Attributing the same cause to every effect regardless of how ludicrous the linkage.”

 

For Exhibit A, check out Issues & Insights’ editorial for today, entitled “What’s Trump Got To Do With The George Floyd Riots?” 

 

And for Exhibit B, read the joint statement issued Monday night by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

 

These two clearly suffer from an incurable strain of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS).

 

 

 

 

 

 

KRUISER’S MORNING BRIEF: Trump Holds Bible in Front of Church, Libs Everywhere Are Triggered. 

 

“President Trump provided the nation a perfect social media snapshot of why so many of us are way beyond being able to seem the American Left as anything but a bunch for raving lunatics.

 

Yeah, I may be a little over the top now but I think I’ve been drowned in so much hyperbole and anti-Trump hysteria AMID THE PANDEMIC that I now feel like responding in kind.”

 

Good stuff.

 

 

 

 

[SectionC3]

7 minutes ago, dubs said:

 

It's not even the void in leadership, it's the people that get fooled into being useful idiots and allow the void to exist.  Take SectionC, Tibs, Gary, and the rest of these clowns.  They ignore every single piece of data and any event that happened before Trump got in office and instead are told to believe that one thing and one thing only is the cause of every issue in this country, Trump.  They are an embarrassment to human evolution.

 

 

 

Hoax.  “We need more prayer in this country.”  Trump could have gone into the church yesterday and prayed.  Instead he used the opportunity to pump some rubber bullets and tear gas into peaceful protesters, defiled the Bible, and the headed back to his bunker.  

 

I do agree on the “useful idiots” point.  Only I see them as Evangelicals and “rule of law” types who buy into this guy’s nonsense.  He is neither an Evangelical nor a supporter of the United States Constitution.  

[Tiberius]

23 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

No. What I am saying is that people like you tend to look down on the rest of society from a lofty place of self-perceived intellectual and moral superiority.

Why, because I think racism is stupid, destructive and wrong? Huh? 

 

 

[B-Man]

Rioters in Philadelphia are using explosives to blow up and then loot ATMs #phillyexplosions

 

 

4 St. Louis cops shot after ‘peaceful’ protest turned violent

 

 

 

‘Complete anarchy’: #NYCriots trends after night of chaos and lawlessness in New York City

 

 

 

Owner of Philadelphia gun store shoots and kills armed looter during break-in

 

 

 

 

[SectionC3]

8 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

He is as an avoid opponent of democracy as we have ever had in that office. I hate it when people try and say "The people put him in office.." Ummm, no, the anti-democratic EC did. No mandate from the people of this country. 

 

The odd thing is that the Electoral College was designed to prevent exactly this type of nonsense.  Again, I couldn’t care less whether somebody votes Democrat or Republican.  The things we disagree upon pale in comparison to our shared values and the points upon which we agree.  This guy, though, is neither.  He cares more about himself than about his country, and that is exactly what we can’t have in any form in any elected office. 

[Magox]

In other words Biden who was a senator all his life and VP for 8 years, could never do any of the things he proposed, when in fact they never federally prosecuted any of these sort of police abuses that occurred and that he passed legislation that contributed to "systemic racism".  Joe "you ain't black" Biden has no authority to speak on this matter when he has been a part of the system that he just railed on all his life.

[BuffaloHokie13]

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Why, because I think racism is stupid, destructive and wrong? Huh? 

No. It's quite simple, really. You tend to ascribe intent to other people's actions. These projections are nearly always incorrect, but they provide a very clear picture of how you, as an individual, think.

[ALF]

Trump threatens 'vicious dogs' and 'ominous weapons' could have been used on White House protesters

 

"Big crowd, professionally organized, but nobody came close to breaching the fence. If they had they would....have been greeted with the most vicious dogs, and most ominous weapons, I have ever seen. That’s when people would have been really badly hurt, at least," Trump tweeted Saturday morning.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-threatens-vicious-dogs-ominous-weapons-could-have-been-used-n1219596

[billsfan1959]

5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Why, because I think racism is stupid, destructive and wrong? Huh? 

 

And the rest of us don't? I rest my case....

[GG]

2 minutes ago, ALF said:

Trump threatens 'vicious dogs' and 'ominous weapons' could have been used on White House protesters

 

"Big crowd, professionally organized, but nobody came close to breaching the fence. If they had they would....have been greeted with the most vicious dogs, and most ominous weapons, I have ever seen. That’s when people would have been really badly hurt, at least," Trump tweeted Saturday morning.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-threatens-vicious-dogs-ominous-weapons-could-have-been-used-n1219596

 

Interesting definition of a threat.

[Tiberius]

1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

And the rest of us don't? I rest my case....

So you agree with me. Then why go after me personally when you say you agree with me? 

3 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

No. It's quite simple, really. You tend to ascribe intent to other people's actions. These projections are nearly always incorrect, but they provide a very clear picture of how you, as an individual, think.

Oh, you don't think the President's racism is appealing to the people that voted for him? 

[Jauronimo]

1 hour ago, Sig1Hunter said:

bingo. This is why it was ok for police to gas and flashbang the “peaceful protest” in Washington DC. Because even if it was peaceful, it was very likely still illegal. I doubt there was a permit, and even if there was I doubt the permit allowed them to block streets. 

Get your paperwork in order or the police have carte blanche to breakup your peaceful protest?  That doesn't sound like protecting or serving.

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Tiberius]

6 minutes ago, Magox said:

In other words Biden who was a senator all his life and VP for 8 years, could never do any of the things he proposed, when in fact they never federally prosecuted any of these sort of police abuses that occurred and that he passed legislation that contributed to "systemic racism".  Joe "you ain't black" Biden has no authority to speak on this matter when he has been a part of the system that he just railed on all his life.

Biden is not 100% perfect so stay with Trump? Weak, so weak 

 

Just a terribly weak argument 

[BuffaloHokie13]

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Oh, you don't think the President's racism is appealing to the people that voted for him? 

You verified my statement in the actual response to it. Thank you.

[Tiberius]

4 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

You verified my statement in the actual response to it. Thank you.

How? 

[Sig1Hunter]

7 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

Get your paperwork in order or the police have carte blanche to breakup your peaceful protest?  That doesn't sound like protecting or serving.

“Law Enforcement”. If the law is you need a permit to lawfully protest, and you don’t have said permit, the protest is therefore illegal. Er go, the cops *can* enforce that law. Carte Blanche? No. Either you don’t know what that means, or you don’t understand that tear gas and flashbangs are accepted and legal means of breaking up illegal protests. 

Edited June 2, 2020 by Sig1Hunter

[Jauronimo]

Just now, Sig1Hunter said:

“Law Enforcement”. If the law is you need a permit to lawfully protest, and you don’t have said permit, the protest is therefore illegal. Er go, the cops *can* enforce that law. Carte Blanche? No. Either you don’t know what that means, or you don’t understand that tear gas and flashbangs are accepted and legal means of breaking up illegal protests. 

Clearly the smart answer from law enforcement is more of the same.  Winning back the public trust one flashbang at a time.  CS gas isn't permissible under the Geneva Convention but if the police manual says you should dispense it like Pez if you doubt they have a permit then it must be the right thing to do.  

 

 

 

[billsfan1959]

16 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So you agree with me. Then why go after me personally when you say you agree with me? 

 

I agree with you that "racism is stupid, destructive and wrong." I do not agree with your indiscriminate labeling of people who think differently than you on political issues as racist.

[BuffaloHokie13]

13 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

How? 

I'm not going to catch this fish for you, but perhaps you can learn. Read my post again, then read your response. Can you determine where you attributed intent to someone else's actions based on your personal interpretation? 

[billsfan1959]

Just now, Jauronimo said:

Clearly the smart answer from law enforcement is more of the same.  Winning back the public trust one flashbang at a time.  CS gas isn't permissible under the Geneva Convention but if the police manual says you should dispense it like Pez if you doubt they have a permit then it must be the right thing to do.  

 

There was nothing violent in what the police did. They slowly and systematically moved the crowd away from the area they wanted them moved. 

 

Don't really see much outrage from you over the 8 police officers who have been shot over the last few days.

 

The public showing they can be trusted by shooting one officer at a time?

[B-Man]

 

 

YOU CAN’T CALL THEM LOOTERS WHEN THEY LOOT, BECAUSE TRUMP USES THAT WORD AND HE’S THE ENEMY.

 

THAT’S HOW #JOURNALISM WORKS:

 

 

 

 

So just because they’re looting, you can’t call them “looters.” You say “some protesters broke into the store and stole whatever was on the shelves.”

 

Weird, you’d think it would be people opposed to the protests who’d want to blur the line between peaceful protesters and violent looters.

 

But then, we’ll have the press defending church-burning before this is all over.

 

 

 

 

[Dante]

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Bolsheviks did not believe in voting rights, Democrats are fighting hard to expand democracy. It's really coming down to you either support Trump, or you support democracy. 

 

Trump now threatening martial laws as he tries to enflame the situation. 

These particular Bolsheviks believe in voting rights. Until the get power. Then. to protect the workers and the general good, they will take that away. 

The situation has already been inflamed. By said Bolsheviks. The line has been crossed from protesting to war. They are harming innocent citizens and private property. The Bolsheviks do not have the right to do that. No matter how principled they believe they are. I am weary of the police state as anyone but good citizens are dying at the hands of psychopaths. 

[B-Man]

 

 

So it was a lie.................good thing I was sitting down.........

 

       

 

 

 

 

.

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

15 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

CS gas isn't permissible under the Geneva Convention

 

 

 

What?

 

Perhaps a bit more research next time. It's banned in warfare (though EVERY person who enlists in the Army at least is exposed to it repeatedly), but there is NO restriction on using it to disperse civilian mobs.

 

Good God man. Clutch pearls much?

 

[Magox]

If you are more focused on tear gas being applied on the protesters more so than the 4 police officers who were shot in St Louis, Police officer shot in the head and died in Las Vegas, the police officer who was ambushed and shot in Iowa, the national guard members who were ran over in Buffalo NY, the police officer who was ran over in NYC, the multiple NY officers who were gang beat up by rioters and the countless stores that were destroyed, then I don't know what to tell you, other than your priorities are all out of wack.

[Jauronimo]

1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

There was nothing violent in what the police did. They slowly and systematically moved the crowd away from the area they wanted them moved. 

 

Don't really see much outrage from you over the 8 police officers who have been shot over the last few days.

 

The public showing they can be trusted by shooting one officer at a time?

The public doesn't work for the police.   

 

Just now, Joe in Winslow said:

 

 

What?

 

Perhaps a bit more research next time. It's banned in warfare (though EVERY person who enlists in the Army at least is exposed to it repeatedly), but there is NO restriction on using it to disperse civilian mobs.

 

Good God man. Clutch pearls much?

 

My research is fine.  Your reading comprehension could improve.

 

So impermissible in warfare but appropriate for our citizens???  Nothing to see here.  Law enforcement is once again above any reproach.

[Sig1Hunter]

19 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

Clearly the smart answer from law enforcement is more of the same.  Winning back the public trust one flashbang at a time.  CS gas isn't permissible under the Geneva Convention but if the police manual says you should dispense it like Pez if you doubt they have a permit then it must be the right thing to do.  

 

 

 

Lol. I doubt they had a permit. I’m sure the DC Metro Police knew whether they did or not. Maybe read up on law, case law, and use of force? It’s not just the “police manual” that allows it. 
 

BTW - you crack me up on the main board. 

[Jauronimo]

Just now, Magox said:

If you are more focused on tear gas being applied on the protesters more so than the 4 police officers who were shot in St Louis, Police officer shot in the head and died in Las Vegas, the police officer who was ambushed and shot in Iowa, the national guard members who were ran over in Buffalo NY, the police officer who was ran over in NYC, the multiple NY officers who were gang beat up by rioters and the countless stores that were destroyed, then I don't know what to tell you, other than your priorities are all out of wack.

I'm just as focused on McAtee, the civilians who were run over in NYC, the multiple protesters who were gang beat in the streets, pepper sprayed with minimal provocation.  

 

As a functional adult, I am capable of understanding that violence against the police is wrong while also understanding that looting is wrong and yet still having an issue with the number of instances of police brutality I am witnessing during protests about police brutality.  

[Tiberius]

17 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

I'm not going to catch this fish for you, but perhaps you can learn. Read my post again, then read your response. Can you determine where you attributed intent to someone else's actions based on your personal interpretation? 

He obviously appealed to people's prejudices running for office. He didn't scapegoat immigrants for a non-existent crime wave for no reason. He scapegoated immigrants as criminals for a reason. To win votes 

[billsfan1959]

3 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

The public doesn't work for the police.   

My research is fine.  Your reading comprehension could improve.

So impermissible in warfare but appropriate for our citizens???  Nothing to see here.  Law enforcement is once again above any reproach.

 

No it doesn't. However, I find it interesting, but not surprising, that with all of the violent criminal behavior taking place, your indignation is over the police moving a peaceful crowd to a new location.

 

There isn't anyone here saying that LE Officers are above reproach. But hey, since you seem to have such a problem with them, why don't you step up to the front of the next riot and show Officers how it should be done....

[Tiberius]

10 minutes ago, Dante said:

These particular Bolsheviks believe in voting rights. Until the get power. Then. to protect the workers and the general good, they will take that away. 

The situation has already been inflamed. By said Bolsheviks. The line has been crossed from protesting to war. They are harming innocent citizens and private property. The Bolsheviks do not have the right to do that. No matter how principled they believe they are. I am weary of the police state as anyone but good citizens are dying at the hands of psychopaths. 

Why? No need to. Demographics are changing in Democrats favor very quickly. When Texas goes solidly Democratic you guys are going to have to change the GOP A LOT to win the presidency again. 

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

9 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

So impermissible in warfare but appropriate for our citizens???  Nothing to see here.  Law enforcement is once again above any reproach.

 

EVERY police force on this planet uses it.

 

All of them.

 

But yes, above reproach.

WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!?!