Jon in Pasadena Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y1xJAVZxXg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 Friggin' nailed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 If stupid people want to waste money then good for them. I can't blame someone for knowing how to take advantage of the dumb for some money. That is what life is about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 If stupid people want to waste money then good for them. I can't blame someone for knowing how to take advantage of the dumb for some money. That is what life is about. Yeah. It's the dumb people that REALLY annoy me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 (edited) ...knowing how to take advantage of the dumb for some money. That is what life is about. If you actually feel this way, I am sorry for you. Edited August 19, 2015 by Cugalabanza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 (edited) John Oliver is pretty funny, but aren't televangelists a passe target? I don't think anyone's eyes are going to be opened by an expose on televangelists. Jim and Tammy Fay pretty much blew the lid off all that 30 years ago. Edited August 19, 2015 by KD in CT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 (edited) https://archive.org/details/Marjoe.1972.Legendado Marjoe is the story of an abused child preacher who grows up to become an Evangelical con man, living a double life as a dope-smoking, girl-chasing hippie in LA. The documentary went on to win the 1972 Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature and earned massive amounts of critical acclaim. But despite the accolades and outrageous story, the film was only played in a handful of theaters on the coasts and was never screened below the Bible Belt. It was eventually forgotten and thought to be lost for good due to the only known copy being badly damaged. However, in 2002, the original negative was rediscovered and the film was released three years later on DVD, introducing Marjoeto a new generation with a greater appetite for films that were critical of religious institutions. http://www.vice.com/read/marjoe-director-sarah-kernochan-talks-about-her-incredible-doc-on-the-evangelical-conman-456 Edited August 19, 2015 by Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon in Pasadena Posted August 19, 2015 Author Share Posted August 19, 2015 John Oliver is pretty funny, but aren't televangelists a passe target? I don't think anyone's eyes are going to be opened by an expose on televangelists. Jim and Tammy Fay pretty much blew the lid off all that 30 years ago. The point of JO's show was that today they are, contrary to what you might expect, still alive, kicking, and draining lots of fools of the little resources they have. Maybe the IRS could tighten up the parts of the tax code that deal with "churches" just a wee bit without causing a massive collapse of society...? If stupid people want to waste money then good for them. I can't blame someone for knowing how to take advantage of the dumb for some money. That is what life is about. Yeah, and the really awesome part is laughing at the lame fools who're gonna end up paying for the dumbfolks' medical care and other life expenses after they've given all of their $$ to the hucksters! Wait, hold on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 John Oliver is pretty funny, but aren't televangelists a passe target? I don't think anyone's eyes are going to be opened by an expose on televangelists. Jim and Tammy Fay pretty much blew the lid off all that 30 years ago. Marjoe blew that lid off in 1972. That documentary I linked is one of the better ones I have ever seen. Check it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 If you actually feel this way, I am sorry for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Aren't they all? Is this really a shocking revelation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhg Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2v3rskhAkS8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 If stupid people want to waste money then good for them. I can't blame someone for knowing how to take advantage of the dumb for some money. That is what life is about. Governments do it all the time with lotteries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Governments do it all the time with lotteries. Yea they do, and you see on this forum people take the anger out on the wrong people. Like I had anything to do with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 That was hilarious. http://www.ourladyofperpetualexemption.com/ I called the 1800 number too...good stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 (edited) When is Oliver going to run an expose on smug comedians who are commie plants and constantly advocate for government control of everything by cherry picking bad guys and then projecting their guilt onto everyone in that sector of society? Oh......we'll probably have to wait a while for that. Edited August 20, 2015 by 4merper4mer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 When is Oliver going to run an expose on smug comedians who are commie plants and constantly advocate for government control of everything by cherry picking bad guys and then projecting their guilt onto everyone in that sector of society? Oh......we'll probably have to wait a while for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 When is Oliver going to run an expose on smug comedians who are commie plants and constantly advocate for government control of everything by cherry picking bad guys and then projecting their guilt onto everyone in that sector of society? Oh......we'll probably have to wait a while for that. Commie plant? Yes, you're going to have to wait awhile for that. You realize plants cannot speak, right? So how can they host their own show? Would it be subtitled? What kind of plants are communists anyways? According to google image, these are: But I'm not sure they're capable of hosting a TV show quite yet. Maybe with another thousand years of evolution they'll get there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 (edited) You realize plants cannot speak, right? Oh no? http://youtu.be/5ea5jKFGgUw Edited August 20, 2015 by Azalin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 (edited) Aren't they all? Is this really a shocking revelation? The point wasn't that it's a scam, the point was how easy it is for such scam artists to get tax exemption status. Side point, not to get too preachy, but these scam artists aren't Christians, and give true Christians a bad name. Nothing in the bible promises prosperity or good physical health during your time on earth. Edited August 20, 2015 by The Real Buffalo Joe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon in Pasadena Posted August 20, 2015 Author Share Posted August 20, 2015 The point was that it's a scam, the point was how easy it is for such scam artists to get tax exemption status. Thank you. I'm amazed (and a little bit scared, frankly) that this point wasn't obvious to everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Oh no? http://youtu.be/5ea5jKFGgUw Touche! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Thank you. I'm amazed (and a little bit scared, frankly) that this point wasn't obvious to everyone. Really? You knew the tax code and rules behind becoming a tax except religion? And think that everyone does? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon in Pasadena Posted August 20, 2015 Author Share Posted August 20, 2015 (edited) Really? You knew the tax code and rules behind becoming a tax except religion? And think that everyone does? I.Knew.It.After.Watching.The.Video. EDIT: In my reply to TRBJ, "this point" refers to the point TRBJ is making. Sorry if that was unclear. Edited August 20, 2015 by Jon in Pasadena Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 If stupid people want to waste money then good for them. I can't blame someone for knowing how to take advantage of the dumb for some money. That is what life is about. I'll wait until you have parents with dementia/Alzheimer's and/or a member of the family who has a mental disability. And I pity you if you think "that is what life is all about". I will just say one thing, and hope this doesn't bring the thread to PPP. How does treating religions like any other business, and taxing them accordingly, violate the First Amendment? There would be fewer decisions to make about what is a "legit" religion and there would be freedom for every one of them. But like any business, they have to pay their taxes---NO DISCRIMINATION. If they are a non-profit, then treat them like any other non-profit. Want to give all religions a special tax rate? Fine. But doesn't offering only recognized religions tax-exempt status make them MORE involved with gov't regulation? I understand we give a religious exemption to almost anyone who applies, but some decisions are being made. Taxing all religions equally is more step with the 1st Amendment, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 (edited) I'll wait until you have parents with dementia/Alzheimer's and/or a member of the family who has a mental disability. And I pity you if you think "that is what life is all about". I will just say one thing, and hope this doesn't bring the thread to PPP. How does treating religions like any other business, and taxing them accordingly, violate the First Amendment? There would be fewer decisions to make about what is a "legit" religion and there would be freedom for every one of them. But like any business, they have to pay their taxes---NO DISCRIMINATION. If they are a non-profit, then treat them like any other non-profit. Want to give all religions a special tax rate? Fine. But doesn't offering only recognized religions tax-exempt status make them MORE involved with gov't regulation? I understand we give a religious exemption to almost anyone who applies, but some decisions are being made. Taxing all religions equally is more step with the 1st Amendment, IMO. Why not just give all of everyone's money to the government? Edited August 21, 2015 by 4merper4mer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Why not just give all of everyone's money to the government? Not sure I understand the comment. But when one party makes money from another, there is typically a tax involved. Why does having this same procedure with all religions discriminate against any one of them? I know some of you are against all taxes (but still like to drive on roads, have police protection, the military, etc) but c'mon. Taxes are a part of any 1st world modern society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 I'll wait until you have parents with dementia/Alzheimer's and/or a member of the family who has a mental disability. And I pity you if you think "that is what life is all about". I will just say one thing, and hope this doesn't bring the thread to PPP. How does treating religions like any other business, and taxing them accordingly, violate the First Amendment? There would be fewer decisions to make about what is a "legit" religion and there would be freedom for every one of them. But like any business, they have to pay their taxes---NO DISCRIMINATION. If they are a non-profit, then treat them like any other non-profit. Want to give all religions a special tax rate? Fine. But doesn't offering only recognized religions tax-exempt status make them MORE involved with gov't regulation? I understand we give a religious exemption to almost anyone who applies, but some decisions are being made. Taxing all religions equally is more step with the 1st Amendment, IMO. The SCOTUS has spoken on the issue. Basically, the court believes that tax exemption for churches involves far less involvement between church and state than would taxing them. For example, if the government can tax churches, it can penalize them when they default, thus endangering free exercise of religion if the clause is read broadly (and the court has, historically, read it broadly). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 The SCOTUS has spoken on the issue. Basically, the court believes that tax exemption for churches involves far less involvement between church and state than would taxing them. For example, if the government can tax churches, it can penalize them when they default, thus endangering free exercise of religion if the clause is read broadly (and the court has, historically, read it broadly). I understand what has been decided in the past. I just disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Not sure I understand the comment. But when one party makes money from another, there is typically a tax involved. Why does having this same procedure with all religions discriminate against any one of them? I know some of you are against all taxes (but still like to drive on roads, have police protection, the military, etc) but c'mon. Taxes are a part of any 1st world modern society. Churches have no owners whether sole proprietor, partner or stockholders to whom they distribute profits. They don't have profits in the traditional sense. How would you tax them? Just take their money? Real healthy for a society. Let's tax charities too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Churches have no owners whether sole proprietor, partner or stockholders to whom they distribute profits. They don't have profits in the traditional sense. How would you tax them? Just take their money? Real healthy for a society. Let's tax charities too. Tax charities, if they aren't non-profit! The Catholic Church, for one, is very profitable. (I'm Roman Catholic, just so you know.) As I said, if they are non-profit treat them like non-profits. What does God have to do with it? And I stil don't understand where the "give all of everyone's money to the government' comment comes from. It has NOTHING to do with what I posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marv's Neighbor Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 John Oliver is pretty funny, but aren't televangelists a passe target? I don't think anyone's eyes are going to be opened by an expose on televangelists. Jim and Tammy Fay pretty much blew the lid off all that 30 years ago. I think Jim is still on TV somewhere. Maybe he's "rehabilitated?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 I understand what has been decided in the past. I just disagree. On what basis? The power to tax involves the power to destroy. Exemption is the best way to ensure free exercise of religion for everyone. It wouldn't be "more in step with the 1st Amendment" to tax all churches. It would run directly against the free exercise clause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 On what basis? The power to tax involves the power to destroy. Exemption is the best way to ensure free exercise of religion for everyone. It wouldn't be "more in step with the 1st Amendment" to tax all churches. It would run directly against the free exercise clause. "The power to tax involves the power to destroy". So we're going with slogans in this discussion? OK, here's mine: "Freedom isn't free. It costs folks like you and me...Freedom costs a buck 'o five" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 "The power to tax involves the power to destroy". So we're going with slogans in this discussion? OK, here's mine: "Freedom isn't free. It costs folks like you and me...Freedom costs a buck 'o five" Slogans? It's from McCulloch vs. Maryland (another USSC case about taxation), and entirely relevant to the conversation. Team America, while always welcome, is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 John Oliver is a very funny guy. I love his show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan89 Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Love John Oliver. with Jon Stewart off the air and Colbert doing a new type of show, Oliver might be the best political satirist on TV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Not sure I understand the comment. But when one party makes money from another, there is typically a tax involved. Why does having this same procedure with all religions discriminate against any one of them? I know some of you are against all taxes (but still like to drive on roads, have police protection, the military, etc) but c'mon. Taxes are a part of any 1st world modern society. Point out which of us are against all taxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 (edited) Tax charities, if they aren't non-profit! The Catholic Church, for one, is very profitable. (I'm Roman Catholic, just so you know.) As I said, if they are non-profit treat them like non-profits. What does God have to do with it? And I stil don't understand where the "give all of everyone's money to the government' comment comes from. It has NOTHING to do with what I posted. Can you really play the "you're misrepresenting my argument" card when you claimed some of us are against all taxes even though we drive on roads? Edited August 21, 2015 by FireChan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted August 23, 2015 Share Posted August 23, 2015 Point out which of us are against all taxes. Are you suggesting you know for certain NOBODY on this board is against all taxes? There are several groups in the USA who preach just that (some of them "religious" groups). Now I admit, I don't know for certain there are any hear who believe that. But just as I don't know for certain any here are gay (or albino for that matter) I just assume a few here probably are. I could be wrong. Why did you feel the necessity to pop in? Did you feel like you were suspect? A response to suggesting some tax on profitable religious organizations was met with the response of "Why not give everyone's money to the government" as if that was an in-kind rebuttal. And the idea some might believe all taxes should be abolished really isn't that far fetched (even though, to me, it seems like it should be). Apparently we have someone who believes it's OK to scam money from dumb people. After all "that's what life is all about". Can you really play the "you're misrepresenting my argument" card when you claimed some of us are against all taxes even though we drive on roads? What? I have no idea what you are getting at. If you are against all taxes, but like roads, I'd say you have some rethinking to do. I didn't say you thought that. Again, why did you feel the need to pop in? Did it seem like I was talking about you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts