B-Man Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 DID GLOBAL WARMING PAUSE OR NOT? Yes, no, maybe. The debate between researchers and doubters reached a crescendo last summer, when scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration updated their temperature records and concluded that global warming has not slowed down in the 2000s ( ClimateWire, June 5, 2015). Now, a group of prominent climate scientists are challenging NOAA’s conclusion in a commentary published this week in Nature Climate Change. “The interpretation [the NOAA group] made was not valid,” said John Fyfe, a climate scientist at Environment and Climate Change Canada and lead author of the commentary. “The slowdown is there, even in this new updated data set.” Don’t you remember the science being settled? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 DID GLOBAL WARMING PAUSE OR NOT? Yes, no, maybe. The debate between researchers and doubters reached a crescendo last summer, when scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration updated their temperature records and concluded that global warming has not slowed down in the 2000s ( ClimateWire, June 5, 2015). Now, a group of prominent climate scientists are challenging NOAA’s conclusion in a commentary published this week in Nature Climate Change. “The interpretation [the NOAA group] made was not valid,” said John Fyfe, a climate scientist at Environment and Climate Change Canada and lead author of the commentary. “The slowdown is there, even in this new updated data set.” Don’t you remember the science being settled? . You can tell it's falsified data when the model is changed to match up and down trends in the past, but becomes more linear later on. They tried to make it look like their guesses were previously accurate, when they were just as wrong then too. How can we trust any "science" that has to continously adjust data to match their theory. Real scientists would have adjusted their theory to match the data. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 You can tell it's falsified data when the model is changed to match up and down trends in the past, but becomes more linear later on. They tried to make it look like their guesses were previously accurate, when they were just as wrong then too. How can we trust any "science" that has to continously adjust data to match their theory. Real scientists would have adjusted their theory to match the data. Do you believe CO2 in the atmosphere traps heat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 26, 2016 Share Posted February 26, 2016 Do you believe CO2 in the atmosphere traps heat? I know that C02 levels were many times what they are now a long time back, 1000's of years before the Industrial Age. Hell, fossilized palm trees have been found in Greenland. Quit yelling that the sky is falling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Climate Change: Fish Will Move Toward Poles, Affecting Poor Nations More 2/27/2016 Nature World News Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Climate Change: Fish Will Move Toward Poles, Affecting Poor Nations More 2/27/2016 Nature World News Lots of Asian carp to fill the void! Gefilte fish and carp ceviche for everyone! BTW... Asian carp is the MOST eaten fish in the world (outside of the picky tastes of North America). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 I know that C02 levels were many times what they are now a long time back, 1000's of years before the Industrial Age. Hell, fossilized palm trees have been found in Greenland. Quit yelling that the sky is falling. So thats a yes, then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Did Obama just want the plan or was it his plan. See I didn't read the plan or know anything about it so I could use some clarification. That's okay, neither did Obama Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Do you believe CO2 in the atmosphere traps heat? Sure, but it's insignificant when compared to the heat that water vapor traps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Sure, but it's insignificant when compared to the heat that water vapor traps. They are related. More CO2 leads to more water vapor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 It's the sun that will kill the planet, not CO2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 WELL, TO BE FAIR, THE WHOLE THING IS ABOUT VIRTUE-SIGNALING AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR GRAFT. PLANET-SAVING IS JUST AN EXCUSE, AND THUS OPTIONAL. A Hollow Treaty: The EU Can’t Keep Its Climate Promises. http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/228066/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Sure, but it's insignificant when compared to the heat that water vapor traps. It's almost comical how so many people focus so intently on CO2, methane, etc as atmospheric warming agents and don't even know that water vapor is far more prevalent than anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 It's almost comical how so many people focus so intently on CO2, methane, etc as atmospheric warming agents and don't even know that water vapor is far more prevalent than anything else. You can't tell people that water vapor is a pollutant without getting laughed at... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 You can't tell people that water vapor is a pollutant without getting laughed at... But tell 'em dihydrogen monoxide is a greater contributor to global warming than CO2, and they'll petition for it to be banned. People are stupid. Who gives a **** what they think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Global warming fruit and veg shortage could lead to 1,200 extra UK deaths a year by 2050 Read more at telegraph.co.uk ... A sure sign of warmism in decline: Yale closing down its ‘Climate and Energy Institute’By Thomas Lifson Peak warmism has already hit and the global warming movement is now on its long glide path through loss of government funding, budget and hiring cuts, less media attention, on the way to unfashionability, embarrassment, and eventually obscurity, a historical footnote like phrenology (which was once the rage in elite academic circles). In retrospect, the December 2015 Paris Climate Accord, which was still able to draw heads of state but which could accomplish nothing substantive other than promise money, may well be seen as the definitive moment at which the movement began its official decline. Now, elite institutions, which always have their antennae attuned to the ebb and flow of the concerns of the world’s power elite, are acting out the consequences of decline. If you are a university president responsible for raising mega-donations by convincing the holders of wealth that they can achieve prestige and maybe a little immortality by funding your Good Works, then you have to be aware of their changing concerns. That was then; this is now. The Yale Daily News announced 3 days ago: Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/a_sure_sign_of_warmism_in_decline_yale_closing_down_its_climate_and_energy_institute.html#ixzz41wmORle1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 Oregon.....................your tax dollars at work. Academics at the University of Oregon present their feminist glaciology framework for global environmental change research: Glaciers are key icons of climate change and global environmental change. However, the relationships among gender, science, and glaciers – particularly related to epistemological questions about the production of glaciological knowledge – remain understudied. This paper thus proposes a feminist glaciology framework with four key components: 1) knowledge producers; (2) gendered science and knowledge; (3) systems of scientific domination; and (4) alternative representations of glaciers. Merging feminist postcolonial science studies and feminist political ecology, the feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power, and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 Oregon.....................your tax dollars at work. Academics at the University of Oregon present their feminist glaciology framework for global environmental change research: "Alternative representation of glaciers." What the !@#$ is that? Are we now worried about the rights of trans- and cis-glaciers? Can we get a Supreme Court ruling on glacier marriage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 "Alternative representation of glaciers." What the !@#$ is that? Are we now worried about the rights of trans- and cis-glaciers? Can we get a Supreme Court ruling on glacier marriage? don't be such a glacist #glaciallivesmatter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 Can we get a Supreme Court ruling on glacier marriage? Elect Hillary, and you just might. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts