Mark80 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 In hindsight. Basically, would you have trade those 4 players for Luck. That's basically the 1st and 2nd the year Luck came out and the next 3 1sts. I'm not saying I know that would get it done, but I feel like it's in the ballpark. Personally, I'd do it. EJ isn't a loss if we have Luck. Gilmore isn't the shutdown corner we thought he'd be. Glenn is still a question mark. I always find it interesting to look at trades involving picks after the picks have been made. To me, this is a no brainer. Just fun speculation You need to add Robert Woods as well. After trading down, EJ pick really became EJ and Woods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 What has Suck for Luck ever won? He's a loser. NoT no, but HELL NO !!! GO BILLS !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 You need to add Robert Woods as well. After trading down, EJ pick really became EJ and Woods. Kiko. We used the Rams pick on Kiko. Woods was taken with our "real" pick at 41. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 I'd do this in a heartbeat if Indy were crazy enough. GO BILLS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 (edited) They could offer the Colts everyone and anyone in the roster, from one guy to the whole roster, as many guys as they want... colts would pass. You can build team from scratch around Luck, and in a few years be a contender. Edited October 23, 2014 by HoF Watkins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 It'd set us back 2 years and maybe 3. Depends where you think we are at. But. It'd not be the worst idea ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NDBUFFCUSEFAN Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 What has Suck for Luck ever won? He's a loser. NoT no, but HELL NO !!! GO BILLS !! Come on man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starrymessenger Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 I don't think there is any trade colts would have listened to. They tanked an entire season for that one guy. And they did the right thing. I'd do it but only if they threw in k. Sheppard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChanOverChin Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 I'm shocked that a grown man would even start such a post........and that people would actually respond to it. How about the Bills trade all of their best players for P. Manning?? Would you do it?? Would you do it?? Ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clippers of Nfl Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 I'm shocked that a grown man would even start such a post........and that people would actually respond to it. How about the Bills trade all of their best players for P. Manning?? Would you do it?? Would you do it?? Ridiculous. I thought it was going to turn funny. At the beginning a poster said something like "What if we give them Hershell Walker" That was funny. Till posters started voting and even discussing this.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 (edited) I'm shocked that a grown man would even start such a post........and that people would actually respond to it. How about the Bills trade all of their best players for P. Manning?? Would you do it?? Would you do it?? Ridiculous. I'm shocked that grown men wear the names of other grown men on the backs of their shirts. GO BILLS!!! Edited October 23, 2014 by K-9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris heff Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 That blockbuster Herschel Walker trade worked out well for the Vikings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hapless Bills Fan Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 In hindsight. Basically, would you have trade those 4 players for Luck. That's basically the 1st and 2nd the year Luck came out and the next 3 1sts. I'm not saying I know that would get it done, but I feel like it's in the ballpark. Personally, I'd do it. EJ isn't a loss if we have Luck. Gilmore isn't the shutdown corner we thought he'd be. Glenn is still a question mark. I always find it interesting to look at trades involving picks after the picks have been made. To me, this is a no brainer. Just fun speculation And the Colts would do this...why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 And the Colts would do this...why? Well, the owner has a thing for prescription drugs.... and he may be aware that JP Losman is currently available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 (edited) For the functionally illiterate (i.e. most of you) let me dumb it down for you. The guy basically asked if, with the benefit of hindsight, and if the Colts were willing, would you think it was worth it to trade 4 firsts and a 2nd for Luck at the time (just like the Foreskins traded 3 firsts and change for RGMe, which in hindsight most would say wasn't worth it. Can anyone give an explanation for trashing OP and this thread that isn't idiotic? Edited October 23, 2014 by Rob's House Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starrymessenger Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 For the functionally illiterate (i.e. most of you) let me dumb it down for you. The guy basically asked if, with the benefit of hindsight, and if the Colts were willing, would you think it was worth it to trade 4 firsts and a 2nd for Luck at the time (just like the Foreskins traded 3 firsts and change for RGMe, which in hindsight most would say wasn't worth it. Can anyone give an explanation for trashing OP and this thread that isn't idiotic? No Rob. The point is 4 firsts and a second is still not enuf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil Posted October 24, 2014 Author Share Posted October 24, 2014 If four #1's and that year's #2 wouldn't have done it, what would have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 You can build team from scratch around Luck, and in a few years be a contender. No you can't, or the Colts would have done it. His 7 turnovers called from last years playoffs and said keep Sammy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 36.8% of people polled must be stupid beyonce fans(no disrespect to beyonce) are http://consequenceofsound.net/2014/10/smart-people-listen-to-radiohead-and-dumb-people-listen-to-beyonce-according-to-new-study/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strive4five Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 why are you wasting our time with this stuff....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts