Clippers of Nfl Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 If four #1's and that year's #2 wouldn't have done it, what would have? You must really like Andrew Luck.... Maybe 11 #1's and a lifetime supply of kentucky fried chicken. Without the chicken add 2 more #1's. For the functionally illiterate (i.e. most of you) let me dumb it down for you. The guy basically asked if, with the benefit of hindsight, and if the Colts were willing, would you think it was worth it to trade 4 firsts and a 2nd for Luck at the time (just like the Foreskins traded 3 firsts and change for RGMe, which in hindsight most would say wasn't worth it. Can anyone give an explanation for trashing OP and this thread that isn't idiotic? I have answers. But most are idiotic. sorry rob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgil Posted October 24, 2014 Author Share Posted October 24, 2014 For someone who doesn't like the premise of this thread, you seem to keep coming back to it a lot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clippers of Nfl Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 For someone who doesn't like the premise of this thread, you seem to keep coming back to it a lot I'm hoping it turns funny at one point. It has potential. I'll give you that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts