Jump to content

What is better, no guns, or more guns?


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, LeviF91 said:

 

If the restriction is limited only to magazines then 6 and 8-shot revolvers would still be fine. 

 

But yeah it's retarded.

 

I believe it's written so that it can apply to revolvers as well.  

 

A mitrailleuse might be okay, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gary M said:

 

That's terrific. I suspect this is where the American left starts asking why the guy who ambushed and shot the cop, and kept slamming the cop's head into the pavement, needed to die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/14/2019 at 2:49 PM, LABillzFan said:

Gotta love Oregon.

 

Give dowtown Portland to Antifa. Reduce mags to 5 rounds and purchases to 20 rounds a month. :lol:

 

 

 

So in order to practice gun safety and accuracy I can only do this by going to the range and shooting 20 rounds a month?  What is this nonsense??  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

So in order to practice gun safety and accuracy I can only do this by going to the range and shooting 20 rounds a month?  What is this nonsense??  

 

And you're not going to be able to afford that, because you'll be paying inflated rates to PG&E to settle your lawsuit against them...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

So in order to practice gun safety and accuracy I can only do this by going to the range and shooting 20 rounds a month?  What is this nonsense??  

 

It's right up there with CA banning lead in bullets because someone thought the condor was going extinct as a result of it getting lead poisoning by eating carcasses left behind by hunters.  I think the preferred CA ammo material is cotton candy, but you still have a 10-week wait period before you're allowed to receive them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

YOU MIGHT NOT BE INTERESTED IN THE GLEICHSCHALTUNG, BUT THE GLEICHSCHALTUNG IS INTERESTED IN YOU: 

 

Anti-Gun Democrat’s Purchase Of ‘Meateater’ Could Pose Big Problems For Hunter-Focused Company.

Meatater, a popular hunter-focused entertainment company started by outdoorsman and writer Steven Rinella, was purchased by a rabidly anti-gun Democrat financier late last year in a move that has raised alarms among hunters and gun-rights activists. The Chernin Group, a California-based investment fund run by wealthy Democratic activist and Hollywood producer Peter Chernin, purchased a controlling stake in Rinella’s Meateater in 2018.

 

The left-wing, anti-gun political activism of Meateater’s largest investor, as well as political commentary and activity from some of its key partners and sponsors, complicates the company’s expansion plans given that such a large percentage of hunters in the United States — who comprise Meateater’s core audience — staunchly support both gun rights and Republican political candidates. Chernin’s company announced the investment in Meateater and its hiring of a new CEO for the company via a press release last October.

 

Chernin, who has donated nearly $500,000 to Democratic candidates and causes since 2015, has repeatedly attacked gun rights and Second Amendment activists over the last year. He retweeted comedian Michael Ian Black’s attack on the National Rifle Association as a “terrorist organization” and a separate Hollywood personality’s attempt to force FedEx and Visa to sever their ties with the NRA.

 

Much more at the link.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DxAX_yaWwAA8dYM.jpg

 

37IgC9B.jpg&key=i9M3QitnYy7kmwQPAQoCyA&w

 

37IgC9B.jpg              1d90515c8344afe174446f228cf9060fbbd22fa203d788908f58e1ad6c156ea5.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thumbnail

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

enough of that sh*t, back to the thread...........

 

 

 

 

Quote

 

yKCk7UT7_bigger.jpgABC7 NewsVerified account @abc7newsbayarea
FollowFollow @abc7newsbayarea

What apparently began as a home invasion turned quickly into a frightening scene for the suspects, after the resident started to defend himself.

 

 

 

.Damn resident defending himself. The nerve of some people.

 

Liberal media idiocy

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BigMcD said:

Oh, I’m sorry, I didn’t know I was being pressed!

sorry, my bad.  i forgot Canadians don't react well under pressure

let me rephrase so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

 

so if i were to politely ask to you to provide an argument other than #orangemanbad, would you be willing to provide a response other than #orangemanbad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, B-Man said:

enough of that sh*t, back to the thread...........

 

 

 

 

 

 

.Damn resident defending himself. The nerve of some people.

 

Liberal media idiocy

 

 

.

 

How dare he frighten suspects breaking in to his home.  Doesn't he know he might have hurt a bystander who just came over to watch and make sure he wasn't dreaming?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, /dev/null said:

sorry, my bad.  i forgot Canadians don't react well under pressure

let me rephrase so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

 

so if i were to politely ask to you to provide an argument other than #orangemanbad, would you be willing to provide a response other than #orangemanbad

No. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol:

 

 

I remember the gay she’s referencing? 

 

One of the few things I remember from basic was a Drill shooting off an entire mag on burst with the buttstock on his balls. Why? To show that 5.56/223 had minimum recoil. 

 

In fact the first time I shot somebody I got concerned for a second because I thought I had a weapons malfunction. I didn’t. Just with the adrenaline and the padding from the vest I couldn’t feel my rifle kick, and it was at night, and stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

I remember the gay she’s referencing? 

 

One of the few things I remember from basic was a Drill shooting off an entire mag on burst with the buttstock on his balls. Why? To show that 5.56/223 had minimum recoil. 

 

In fact the first time I shot somebody I got concerned for a second because I thought I had a weapons malfunction. I didn’t. Just with the adrenaline and the padding from the vest I couldn’t feel my rifle kick, and it was at night, and stuff. 

Do you remember all the gays? Fondly?

Edited by 3rdnlng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/16/2019 at 9:01 AM, LABillzFan said:

 

That's terrific. I suspect this is where the American left starts asking why the guy who ambushed and shot the cop, and kept slamming the cop's head into the pavement, needed to die.

 

Perhaps he was just on his way to buy some Skittles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

and since libs/dems consider most every gun "semi-automatic"...........we know where that leads.

 

 

 

Considering the visceral reaction from many on the Left these last two and years, it could be debated whether we live in a civil society

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/19/2019 at 10:58 PM, B-Man said:

enough of that sh*t, back to the thread...........

 

.Damn resident defending himself. The nerve of some people.

Liberal media idiocy

.

 

Because someone breaking into your home is not a frightening event for the homeowner? :wallbash::wallbash:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

from  the comments:

 

"

Nicholas Moore Nobody is asking why the man was killed? We have a judge jury and justice system to decide his fate! Cops should not be killers."
 
"
Nicholas Moore Jerry Knitis I understand shooting back, but shooting until dead? No! Cuff him, get him into custody! What if it was your brother or father? Rather see him in prison than at a cemetery!"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Gary M said:

 

from  the comments:

 

"

Nicholas Moore Nobody is asking why the man was killed? We have a judge jury and justice system to decide his fate! Cops should not be killers."
 
"
Nicholas Moore Jerry Knitis I understand shooting back, but shooting until dead? No! Cuff him, get him into custody! What if it was your brother or father? Rather see him in prison than at a cemetery!"

 

Where's "He was preemptively defending himself, because he knew the cop was going to kill him!"

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

and since libs/dems consider most every gun "semi-automatic"...........we know where that leads.

 

 

 

 

I agree with this proposal. Let's start with disarming her home and personal security detail and go from there. If guns aren't needed, then you don't need armed security.

 

17 minutes ago, Gary M said:

Nicholas Moore Nobody is asking why the man was killed? We have a judge jury and justice system to decide his fate! Cops should not be killers."

 

 
"
Nicholas Moore Jerry Knitis I understand shooting back, but shooting until dead? No! Cuff him, get him into custody! What if it was your brother or father? Rather see him in prison than at a cemetery!"

 

What the *****?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...