YoloinOhio Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 @RQUINN619: Zack Martin comparable to these guys based on measurables pic.twitter.com/siXN8PNyAd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 I've heard the Matt Light comparison made several times with Zack Martin, that's good company to be compared to. I'm totally fine with Martin after a trade down, although doesn't it seem a bit strange that we would be targeting such a smallish O-Lineman? Marrone has said dozens of times that he values larger O-Lineman and his goal is to beef up the Bills upfront. As talented as Martin is he doesn't fit that profile at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsVet Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 All of this talk about Martin is ironic, in that 4 years ago it was flat-out wrong to take Bryan Bulaga (who isn't a carbon copy of Martin admittedly) because you don't get value drafting RT's that high. That, and people were enamored of CJ Spiller. It's a deep draft for OT's, and I'd think the drop off from Martin to someone in the early 2nd wouldn't be so considerable to warrant taking a RT at 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 All of this talk about Martin is ironic, in that 4 years ago it was flat-out wrong to take Bryan Bulaga (who isn't a carbon copy of Martin admittedly) because you don't get value drafting RT's that high. That, and people were enamored of CJ Spiller. It's a deep draft for OT's, and I'd think the drop off from Martin to someone in the early 2nd wouldn't be so considerable to warrant taking a RT at 9. As bad as it is to admit it, I wanted Bulaga. I thought he might be able to play LT. I didn't want Spiller because I didn't think it was a big enough need. That said, Spiller is the better player and I've learned my ways. The idea of taking a RT at #9 absolutely sucks. I understand it and I like a guy like Matthews being capable as a LT, but man, such a buzzkill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 As bad as it is to admit it, I wanted Bulaga. I thought he might be able to play LT. I didn't want Spiller because I didn't think it was a big enough need. That said, Spiller is the better player and I've learned my ways. The idea of taking a RT at #9 absolutely sucks. I understand it and I like a guy like Matthews being capable as a LT, but man, such a buzzkill. Exactly! A RB in round 2 would be a 2 day buzzkill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 Exactly! A RB in round 2 would be a 2 day buzzkill Yup and it's not about the player. It just would make no sense. Draft a rb with a 2nd to trade Spiller (with his 5.1 career ypc) for like a 4th round pick??? It would be mind blowingly stupid. The only thing that could be worse is to draft a S in the 1st. Stop creating holes and then filling them with high picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewildrabbit Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 As bad as it is to admit it, I wanted Bulaga. I thought he might be able to play LT. I didn't want Spiller because I didn't think it was a big enough need. That said, Spiller is the better player and I've learned my ways. The idea of taking a RT at #9 absolutely sucks. I understand it and I like a guy like Matthews being capable as a LT, but man, such a buzzkill. That is the difference between you and me, and probably me and the entire board here. I would freak out if the team drafted an OT in the first, and freak out in a good way. I would probably be looking to buy season tickets again if they went OT in the first, and OG in the second. Conversely, what would absolutely suck for me is another defensive first round pick on a team loaded with #1's & #2's, save perhaps Mack. The reality? I can see the Bills drafting another DB since there are no RB's rated that high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 That is the difference between you and me, and probably me and the entire board here. I would freak out if the team drafted an OT in the first, and freak out in a good way. I would probably be looking to buy season tickets again if they went OT in the first, and OG in the second. Conversely, what would absolutely suck for me is another defensive first round pick on a team loaded with #1's & #2's, save perhaps Mack. The reality? I can see the Bills drafting another DB since there are no RB's rated that high. All I will say is if a OT is the highest rated player on their board (not including positions like cb or rb which we shoudn't draft), I will understand it. I won't like it, because I feel top 10 picks should be playmakers or at least LTs. But I will accept it and hope for the best. But draft party over! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 I'm agreeing with everything you are saying CBiscuit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Bills Fan Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 #rollhyde This CBF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussellDopeland Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 All I will say is if a OT is the highest rated player on their board (not including positions like cb or rb which we shoudn't draft), I will understand it. I won't like it, because I feel top 10 picks should be playmakers or at least LTs. But I will accept it and hope for the best. But draft party over! My sentiments as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimer1960 Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 I like the idea of an OT here- I don't care that the rookie will "only" play RT. My concern is whether Zack Martin can really play RT in the NFL. If he turns out to be too short to effectively play RT, I would think it is a mistake to take him at 9 only to have to move him to OG. I know many thought that Cordy Glenn couldn't play LT and he is doing that well. Perhaps Martin could do well at RT even though many are projecting him to OG? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1billsfan Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 I've heard the Matt Light comparison made several times with Zack Martin, that's good company to be compared to. I'm totally fine with Martin after a trade down, although doesn't it seem a bit strange that we would be targeting such a smallish O-Lineman? Marrone has said dozens of times that he values larger O-Lineman and his goal is to beef up the Bills upfront. As talented as Martin is he doesn't fit that profile at all. He wasn't even brought in for a workout. I'm surprised this thread has grown to 5 pages considering this fact...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 He wasn't even brought in for a workout. I'm surprised this thread has grown to 5 pages considering this fact...lol Yes he was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Hammersticks Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 I'm starting to believe the hype. The Bills love Martin. Kinda vanilla draft pick, but I wouldn't cry about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snamsnoops Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 And the Bills could easily extend Jackson for another two seasons, if he continues to have the same production. Spiller either takes the 4.5M /year salary or walks. The Bills can then address RB in FA next year or draft one in 2015. There is no rush to get a RB this season. I would rather spend that pick on a potential QB like Murray, Boyd, Mettenberger, or Savage who all should be available in the 3rd round. . yup this^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 I'm starting to believe the hype. The Bills love Martin. Kinda vanilla draft pick, but I wouldn't cry about it. Polian loves him, FWIW. He was raving about him on ESPN the other day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snamsnoops Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 so did you cry in 1983 when the Bills selected the third best QB? I like the Martin pick. And we do have needs. At tackle and guard- Martin can play both Yeah they should have traded up n grabbed Elway. Now that man would have won us some SB's! Kelly was great ans is still a big part of B-lo, but I did shed a tear! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloRebound Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Just watched his Rutgers/ND bowl game tape. Martin was impressive. Great run blocker. Consistently pushed his man 3-5 years down the field. Seems like a safe pick at #9. If he does struggle at Tackle, he'll be an All-Pro guard. We could do worse, but would prefer to trade down if he's our best option at #9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 I'm starting to believe the hype. The Bills love Martin. Kinda vanilla draft pick, but I wouldn't cry about it. After watching some of their games the last couple of days and focusing on Martin, I can understand why they do. I like this guy a lot. He's an excellent player and I strongly suspect he will be one in the pros as well, wherever he ends up on the OL. I have no issue with drafting him 9th overall, especially given the other players most likely available when we pick. If they can trade down, so much the better, though I'm not sure I'd risk it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts