DefenseWinzChampionshipz Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 Pat Angerer and Jonathan Vilma are still out there. I'd take either one. Preferably Angerer. Any takers?
Mark Vader Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 We've gotten enough linebackers in free agency. I'd rather get another one in the draft.
Chandler#81 Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 Vilma? Doesn't he play for $$? -on the side??
Buffalo Barbarian Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 On 3/29/2014 at 8:16 AM, Mark Vader said: We've gotten enough linebackers in free agency. I'd rather get another one in the draft. this
BuffaloFan68 Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 A. Barr would be perfect to shut down New Englands TEs.
Green Lightning Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 The FO is building with youth. We'll be drafting a LB..
3rdand12 Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 On 3/29/2014 at 6:50 AM, DefenseWinzChampionshipz said: Pat Angerer and Jonathan Vilma are still out there. I'd take either one. Preferably Angerer. Any takers? If we had not landed Spikes , maybe. But i think Bills nailed it in FA at LB
CardinalScotts Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 yep whos the sucker ? Is that the Raiders I see
Nanker Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 The best LB will be gone by 9 and the best of the rest won't be there at 41 either... possibly Borland. Maybe Bullough in the 3rd or 4th. Smallwood doesn't excite. Meh, why even bother.
MattM Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 We have bigger needs, post-FA, like S, RT, TE and a big WR.
Doc Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 On 3/29/2014 at 1:10 PM, Nanker said: The best LB will be gone by 9 and the best of the rest won't be there at 41 either... possibly Borland. Maybe Bullough in the 3rd or 4th. Smallwood doesn't excite. Meh, why even bother. The best LB last year wasn't gone until pick 46. And the only LB I'd consider taking at 9 is one who can cover a guy like Gronk. Although he's becoming a china doll, probably from steroids ravaging his body.
BuffalothruMyVeins Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 On 3/29/2014 at 1:15 PM, Doc said: The best LB last year wasn't gone until pick 46. And the only LB I'd consider taking at 9 is one who can cover a guy like Gronk. Although he's becoming a china doll, probably from steroids ravaging his body. That's a pretty lazy assumption to make based on no evidence, and one that must be the bane of the existence of all pro athletes. In this PED era, there has become sort of a red scare pointing fingers without any proof, and the accusation immediately becomes the verdict in the court of public opinion. I don't mean to single you out, I have been guilty of it too, we'd all be naive to think it's not in the spirt.
Mr. WEO Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 On 3/29/2014 at 1:15 PM, Doc said: The best LB last year wasn't gone until pick 46. And the only LB I'd consider taking at 9 is one who can cover a guy like Gronk. Although he's becoming a china doll, probably from steroids ravaging his body. Perhaps you are thinking about that "low risk, high reward" pickup Marriman. As for Gronk, what makes you think he's on steroids? Tell us what your evidence is.
Doc Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 On 3/29/2014 at 1:28 PM, BuffalothruMyVeins said: That's a pretty lazy assumption to make based on no evidence, and one that must be the bane of the existence of all pro athletes. In this PED era, there has become sort of a red scare pointing fingers without any proof, and the accusation immediately becomes the verdict in the court of public opinion. I don't mean to single you out, I have been guilty of it too, we'd all be naive to think it's not in the spirt. On 3/29/2014 at 1:59 PM, Mr. WEO said: Perhaps you are thinking about that "low risk, high reward" pickup Marriman. As for Gronk, what makes you think he's on steroids? Tell us what your evidence is. What makes me think a pro football player, much less one who is getting injured constantly, is on steroids? Nothing. And yes, he reminds me of Merriman.
FluffHead Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 On 3/29/2014 at 6:50 AM, DefenseWinzChampionshipz said: Pat Angerer and Jonathan Vilma are still out there. I'd take either one. Preferably Angerer. Any takers? The trust is cheap
DefenseWinzChampionshipz Posted March 29, 2014 Author Posted March 29, 2014 I'm pretty surprised at some of the responses. Maybe the no love for Vilma I understand but Angerer is a beast IMO. Why not get another starting LB which we all believe we need and focus more on S, RT, WR, TE in the draft? From what I assumed, I thought Angerer was fairly young. I might need to double check his bio. Vilma is getting old so I understand but a 1 year deal wouldn't hurt. That way the LB the Bills wanted to draft is off the board, we still can have a productive year and go after our LB in next year's draft when it would become more of a necessity. There's no guarantee with rookies. At least the two guys I mentioned have a stamp on the game and tape to prove their consistency.
JPS Posted March 29, 2014 Posted March 29, 2014 On 3/29/2014 at 4:03 PM, FluffHead said: The trust is cheap I LOVE IT!!!
Recommended Posts