Dr. Who

No one can reasonably argue with this. I am not confident this regime knows what it is doing. I did not like the Sammy trade or the Dareus trade, but you can't judge a vision before new players are brought in. Lots of new scouts; hopefully, they know what they are doing. I'm really hoping they know how to evaluate qb.

I think you have more of an agenda than you admit or perhaps recognize, but that's fine with me. You bashed Tyrod's awful play against the Saints, so good for you. I don't really care who plays qb this year. I'm not interested in getting into the playoffs as a marginal wild card team in a year where the AFC is pathetically weak. If one does care about that, Taylor makes more sense. I thought Peterman might fit Dennison's offense better, but the oline is so bad you need a fella with Taylor's athleticism.

Sure, and every year about this time, folks start figuring Bills' wild card odds and wondering if we will finally get a qb in the next draft that can play.

They really need to fix the O-line. Tyrod is not a good qb, imo, but he makes the execrable line look better than it is, which is not to say he makes them look good. I don't think it is doing Peterman a service throwing him back out there if they can't protect him. DIfficult to have confidence in this regime, but we're stuck with it so hoping for the best.

That is a nice hockey sweater -- and royal blue is simply the only color the Sabres should rock. Too bad the team is awful.

I would absolutely make that trade, but I suspect Rosen will go #1 overall. I'm not really sure that's enough and if it's the Browns or Giants, I think they just take Rosen.

Implicit in the argument is actually drafting a franchise qb. Obviously, there is risk, but what we have is not good enough.

Don't care about the 5 yr contract. Seat will be flaming, not "a little hot." Giants are almost certain to take a qb and if the Colts aren't sold on Luck returning to health, they may be looking as well. Browns, Cards, Jets, if you go through the league, lots of teams need qb. I agree Bears and 49ers are potential trade partners; Colts, too, if they are okay with Luck.

Depressing analysis going on here and it's difficult to find any room to disagree. I am largely in the both coaching and talent camp. Better hope the new scouts are really good at finding gems and the coaching staff figures out how to coach talented players that sometimes require putting up with rather than trading them off for low round draft picks.

Well, he's not my first choice. I'd rather trade up and get Rosen -- probably not happening. I prefer Mayfield if he falls to us. Jackson has a chance, though, and I'd take him. If Brownies let Hue Jackson go, I think he'd make a fine OC.

He'll likely be available. We should look into it.

That's a solid ranking. Just find a way and get one of them.

He looks like a pleasant, decent fella. As for brights, we'll see, but his Wonderlic score was fairly good and he seems able to read a defense and see the field, which will be a change for us.

Thanks for clarifying.

COT = Cult of Tyrod, I believe. I have consistently thought Tyrod was not a franchise qb and probably really a decent backup. Nonetheless, I was happy when he seemed to play well and prior to the last few games, he exceeded my expectations. I have enough real life problems and have no desire to become embroiled in message board silliness. I like Tyrod as a person. He's just not that good and it appears defenses have figured him out. He is also not really suited for the offense Dennison is using. Peterman fits the offense. The majority of fans are eager for a new face and the second-string qb is always popular until he actually has to play. I think Peterman has an inside straight kind of chance to surprise and I hope he does.

Certainly, any view of a fella going by SaviorPeterman I take as 100% objective. J/k, I am hoping we found the proverbial overlooked gem. At minimum, Peterman's skill set matches WCO much better than Tyrod's.

The quality of the 2018 qb draft doesn't appear as desirable as it did before the season. Nonetheless, I like the win-win-win scenarios.

Yes, it's not at all a good sign.

In the CFL, probably.

It's not over because the AFC is full of not very good teams. If we can rise above pathetic, we might squeak in and then get crushed.

So is it the team quit on Taylor? The whole unit, the OC? Can't really answer these rhetorical questions, but I wonder if there is confidence that with better personnel the offense will function well or at least not be a complete disaster. I was hoping the mirage was not a mirage, but in general its hard to argue against this. Well, fine, but we got rid of a fella who was not zealous for the process and picked up a cool sixth round draft pick that could escalate to a fifth!

Yep. This ^^^^^^^ in spades.

We obviously confused defending your dirt with playing like dirt. Simple mistake.

Well, I agree with Dr. K's assessment. Snarky and nasty at 45 is not a good look, either.

How old are you? I was fine with that sort of thinking when I was in my thirties. Now I'd like to see a decent team before I am wearing Depends.