Dr. Who

I actually don't mind the brash confidence. I'm rather hoping we might trade up and get him, but I doubt it is a possibility.

I am with you, but one is forced to hope it works out. The Wyoming qb, Josh Allen, is supposed to be another worth keeping in mind. Who are you suggesting?

Someone will trade up to the top of the second and take Kizer. He's an articulate fellow. His comments were taken out of context.

LOL. Perfect.

Chiefs and Texans saw franchise qb. I liked all three drafted qbs. Now we may be in a position to trade back the assets gained today to take a franchise qb next year. Could have taken one at ten, but the fans for the most part still buy the "weak qb class" line even after three are drafted in the first twelve picks. I shall hope it works out. What else can one do? This certainly does not, as some foolishly appear to think, allow us to go get the number one pick. For that matter, the Browns have two firsts and three seconds for the 2018 draft. Meanwhile, we have surprisingly recycled cb.

Not a fan, but plausible.

Yes, I agree. Davis is a nice wr, but I think Mahomes could be special. Hope they pull the trigger, but doubt it will happen.

Apparently, Leroi still thinks Davis most likely. I wasn't really doubting you, just emoting.

Just when you think priorities and character are absent from modern civilization. Brings a tear to my eyes, it does.

Thrilled about Mahomes, but if we trade back, I think the Cards take him at #13.

Don't do this. Just when I have resigned myself to disappointment . . .

I have a feeling I'm going to be crying in my beer. Have fun though.

Very much agree.

Fan base deserves the team they get. If indeed it turns out McD, a first year head coach, has accrued this much power with the Pegulas without even coaching a down, it's a bad sign, imo. It will be much worse if they get rid of DW and bring in someone McD suggests. Cart before horse dumb, and points to a lack of structural logic that has bedeviled Pegula in both franchises.

If I were GM, I'd probably be hated more than Whaley -- I'd be looking to do something like the following for Day 1 & 2: #10 Pat Mahomes #44 Sidney Jones (he'll go in the second on the basis of latest medical reports, imo.) #75 Chris Godwin (probably won't last, but since this is fantasy land anyway.) Unless you want to burn a first on RT, this is not the draft for offensive lineman. Deep RB class means you can get a good one as late as the fifth.

Ahh, they're going to package them to move up into the fourth.

Now we definitely need to draft JuJu so we can have JuJu and McDoom on the same team. This GM thing is easy.

Seriously? I googled Eddie McDoom. That is a real fella.

My inside sources should get back to me in about fifteen minutes.

It's definitely a first-world problem.

The consensus seems to be that this is an especially good draft year at defensive back. This does not make me automatically want to draft one early. It makes me think I can get a high quality cb later in the draft. I would concentrate on the positions of draft scarcity early on. Unfortunately, for some positions, like rt, there is no good price point in this draft.

I think that is an exaggeration. Most, like myself, who advocate for qb think the importance of the position and the perceived limits of Taylor mean one should weight one's evaluation in favor of a qb with a reasonable probability of becoming a franchise qb. I'd prefer a "sure thing" player at another position of need over a "long shot" overdrafted qb. On the other hand, I would take a greater risk on a qb over a position player. It's a nuanced deliberation. I simply disagree with those who are convinced this is a weak qb class of long shots.

I think Trubisky, Watson, Mahomes and Kizer all go before #44. Webb, may go before then as well.

I would like to draft a qb who can throw with anticipation.

Sawdust for brains. If Murphy is the talking head for OBD, no bueno.