ngbills

Big Ditch and Pressure Drop for beer. Resurgance is decent as well.

137-3

No brainer trades if available on the cheap - Fuller, Cooks, Norwell, Engram, Sanders

If we traded Addison we still not dress AJE or Basham. I really dont see a huge drop from Addison to either of those guys.

Addison for Engram/Hurst or Norwell/Hernandez or Sanders.

utilize the edges, play action roll out, crossing routes, spread the field, make the d account for allen;s legs

I would say yes and no. At every level this changes and there are always those that adjust faster than others. What also happens is some dont get the same opportunities. That is why you will see guys blossom a few years into careers or even older guys that seemingly are way better. But the "it" factor concept? Not sure how real it is at the pro level. Most of the guys that get this far have or had the it factor. I think it becomes being in the right situation more often than not. And I will end with - have you ever heard from players or coaches that player xyz sucks, doesn't have it, etc. No. Its always glowing reviews. We heard it from EJ Manuel to Nate Peterman and basically everyone else.

Sanders - 4.49 vs DS 4.66 and Moss 4.7. That is a big difference. And Sanders is listed at 211 which is heavier than both of them.

Henry long TD call still pisses me off. Multiple holds and a block in the back. Especially since they call back the two Bills TD's on similar holds that they let slide on Henry's run.

Any offense issues would not be due to Sanders.

No problem giving away 5-7 rounders for a rental player. Heck even 2-4 round picks would be considered. With our roster we have 2nd rounders not even active on game days.

is this even a question? Obviously you dont have to be a one seed, but if you have the chance it is a huge advantage. Just because there non 1 seeds that have made it means nothing.

I have no problem trading 5-7 round picks for someone that would help now. Losing those types of picks for a help us now guy is a no brainer. If Breida = Sanders then our coaching staff has a lot of explaining to do why he is not even active for games.

Already thinking playoffs...

Andrew Norwell from JAC and was at CAR...

Thread for discussing potential trade targets and deals. Not intended to be a we dont need to or we wont make a deal thread. It may be unlikely that a deal is made but is still a interesting discussion. Potential names the Bills could pursue: Hayden Hurst - Insurance if Knox is hurt and a good option to go along with Knox when healthy. Evan Engram - See above Noah Igbinoghene - Upgrade over Wallace/Jackson? Kyle Fuller - See above

Yes, this drive was a not the ultimate killer but led to it. Bills needed to at least put up three and take some clock.

If you pause it pre-snap I see the roll out to the right side being wide open. You have Moss who can lead block and still have Beasley and Sanders in one on one coverage running quick outs/slants. Josh either runs it in or throws to one of them if the defender steps up.

Obviously there is but of any position it may be the easiest to pick up mid season. These guys have been running schemes for years and know how to shift, stunt, twist, etc. May take a couple weeks - bye week is perfect time. But he can be up to speed fast enough.

Temp solutions: R Rodgers FA D Fells Trade DET Engram or Rudolph Trade NYG Gesecki Trade MIA (unlikely but is a FA I think so maybe?)

Here is the scheme - run and get to the qb. Not a long lesson to learn.

Would do this even if to keep him off KC, TEN, BAL, LAC, etc. Upgrade over quite a few guys on the DL/LB.

Milano was the least impactful I have seen in some time for playing every snap.

Predictions below. We become CIN fans rooting for wins vs KC, LAC and at least one vs BAL. Then get to watch CIN beat KC in the 1st round, BAL beats CLE, LAC beats TEN. Bills end CIN season and play LAC who beat BAL. Bills beat LAC for match up in LA vs Rams in Super Bowl. 1 - BUF: 13-4 (losses to TB, NYJ resting starters) 2 - KC: 13-4 (losses @ CIN) 3 - BAL: 12-5 (losses @ CLE, @ CIN, GB, LAR) 4 - TEN: 12-5 (losses KC, @LAR, @PIT) 5 - LAC 13-4 (losses @CIN, KC) 6 - CLE: 11-6 (losses @CIN, @BAL, @GB) 7 - CIN: 11-6 (losses @BAL, @LAV, @DEN, @CLE)