They are all debatable. These calls were all judgement calls. We are not talking about knowing the guy stepped out of bounds or that the ball hit the ground. A roughing call is open for interpretation. Saying he avoided hitting the qb is no different than saying the DB did touch the WR. Those are not apples vs oranges. Its applying the rules as written. You could argue a pass interference call is actually less debatable because you can see the defender making contact before the ball is there, where a roughing call involves some degree of intent and guesswork of did he try to avoid or not. .