Jump to content

BuffaloBillyG

Community Member
  • Posts

    12,105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BuffaloBillyG

  1. Excellent post. This is exactly what I've thought would happen as well. I do expect one later pick to be used on a RB as well. WR wise Pettis is one to watch as well imo.
  2. And if Darnold doesn't go first it's going to go from wacky to straight up kooky-dookes.
  3. True. But one can argue that being a fan of the Buffalo Bills is it's own form of mental illness as well. MEDS FOR ALL!!!
  4. Lamar Jackson: NO AGENT - He's inconsistent - He's inaccurate - Strong arm and athletic - Can't make progressions Maybe a WR Josh Allen: HAS AGENT - He's inconsistent - He's inaccurate - Strong arm and athletic - Can't make progressions Biggest upside to anyone in the draft. There's a reason for that 3% being a value. The way they are presented in the media is the biggest case in point I've ever seen. They have the same flaws by and large...no one is saying Allen would be smart to consider TE. Honestly if I was forced to choose I'd have to pick Jackson as he's at the very least way more of an athlete. Way more dangerous a playmaker. And I really hope we don't end up with Jackson.
  5. I may not like all 6, but I will support the hell out of who ever we end up with. Even Rudolph.
  6. Well we just had an entire day based around a schedule release. I'll go with that tbh.
  7. I don't think it matters even who they want...it's what's the lineup and who do they end up with? Those answers and more coming soon.
  8. It believe Leftwich was as well...just expected in the later part of the round.
  9. The most interesting thing to me there is it took a pro staff a couple of years to figure out that Boller was bad.
  10. I would select Mason Rudolph. Just to see the meltdown here. Hopefully Beane doesn't come here and want to do the same.
  11. LA Chargers. They are a wild card out there. Ravens are another one.
  12. My opinion is Thursday night needs to get here. Quick.
  13. Welp. Onto next draft then... "RESTOCK FOR LOCK"
  14. I can see the threads now. They are GLORIOUS!!! Has the term "Restock for Lock" been taken yet? I may want to copyright that one...
  15. Yup, good QBs put up good QBR. And that's wonderful. But again, to cherry pick a stat that is outdated is just not a good argument. If you want to line it up with guys that had the top QBR that season also winning a Super Bowl...great. Valid. To talk about career QBR? Flimsy at best. Here's a list of the top 20 all time. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/pass_rating_career.htm Notice that 11 of the 20 on this list never won a Super Bowl. Also if you talk QBR understand that it get convoluted after time. Ryan Tannehill has a higher QBR than Dan Marino. So he would be the best Dolphin QB of all time? Also notice that what that what was posted on here was altered by count. Montana is 13th in QBR but somehow ends up 10th on his list.
  16. I have sources that can confirm Jaime is Flo's love child with the "Can you hear me now" guy. And they are buying all kinds of land in south Buffalo.
  17. Now that's not just dense it's just plain dumb. If give you it's the most important..but far from the only position that matters. Instead of looking at a cherry picked and outdated metric look at the sum of the parts. There is a reason that QBs like Rivers and Luck haven't won a Super Bowl. There's a reason why Brees and Rodgers have each won 1 despite being like all-time greats. You have to build a roster. I said earlier...I do agree we need that top guy. And the sooner the better. But to think that a QB is all that matters is just plain wrong. And if all you have is that QB and he goes down (and he eventually will if you don't have blocking for him...but I guess Oline doesn't matter) what do you have then? The Colts and Pack were good examples of that this year.
  18. And? QB rating is one of the most USELESS stats out there. That's like saying 47 of the 52 Super Bowls have had a QB with brown eyes.
×
×
  • Create New...