Jump to content

Boatdrinks

Community Member
  • Posts

    17,162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Boatdrinks

  1. Probably true, because they generally suck as a whole.
  2. Quite possibly another team may not view it as that much of a distraction. It’s the NFL after all. I agree the position isn’t way up in the hierarchy.
  3. That could be true, but it doesn’t mean their investigation didn’t find the story to be full of inconsistencies. I’m pretty much hoping he’s guilty at this point as that’s about all that would make this outcome satisfactory.
  4. I think he will end up in another team. It’s too soon imo to say whether I like the release or not. Hopefully we will find out why they made the decision. If he lied to McD , Beane or anyone else in the Bills organization then I agree with the move 100%. If it turns out they did it based on anything else then there’s plenty of room for skepticism.
  5. I concur. Hopefully this is close to what happened. If Araiza was not forthcoming or gave false information they absolutely should have released him. I just hope that they didn’t cave to the media mob. They haven’t given me any reason yet to doubt their standards, so all I can do as a fan is trust that the decision was made for this or a similar reason. I’d be very disappointed otherwise.
  6. Perhaps McD and Beane (with the blessing of the Pegulas) actually believe in doing the right thing- namely standing by the young man they drafted if he is not responsible for this alleged incident. It’s hard to believe in this day and age, I know but they seem to have principles. The savage and psychopathic media makes it difficult to let the investigation play out, but I’m impressed by the Bills handing of this to date. I’m confident when the truth is known as best it can be under the circumstances that they will do the right thing . Maybe they’ll prove me wrong and cave in, but as a fan I’m proud of their response thus far.
  7. Keenum is better than the physically limited Barkley. Still, he could probably only keep the ship afloat for 3-4 weeks if pressed into service. I highly doubt the Bills will actively shop for a backup QB at this point. There just won’t be anyone appreciably better than Keenum available.
  8. Man , I miss those times.
  9. That same 13k in 1975 would equal about $71,500 in todays dollars. Median household income in Buffalo was around 39.5k according to 2016-2020 data.
  10. Agreed. A lot of Robert Woods in Shakirs game.
  11. Shakir appears to have inside track at PR. Seems sure handed and confident.
  12. I’d still take Keemun over Barkley in a game that matters. Barkley is just a liability athletically.
  13. I think we’ve played them twice at OP in last 12 years if memory serves? Seems like 3 times that at Arrowhead fwiw.
  14. Ridiculous. The Teachers union are complete losers for agreeing to this.
  15. I agree with your take, save for the part about being surprised. Backup QB overreactions on this board ( and from Bills fans in general) are as sure as the sun rising in the East. Close 2nd would be preseason RB overreactions.
  16. Barkley did fine, but he knows this offense and it was the second half of PS game one. While no good team can afford to be without their starter for very long, I’d still prefer Keemun in a game that mattered. Barkley is a great guy to have in the room and all that, but too slow and weak armed at regular season game speed.
  17. Things looking a little too easy for the Colts out there today .
  18. Who’s complaining about elites? They pay lawyers who understand every loophole. So be it. The IRS should be smaller or even abolished. Taxes should be simplified for the vast majority of taxpayers and should only take maybe a half hour to complete.
  19. They currently do what they can vs elites but they don’t always win. They will soon be mobilized to bleed every last nickel from the middle class. Easy targets that will have to pay.
  20. They won’t be targeting elites. Again there are too few of them and they have lawyers to fight it out. No, the liberal wet dream wishlist will be paid for by ordinary Americans and they’ll be bled dry by mobilizing IRS forces.
  21. Obviously it’s political and of course the actions aren’t justified. It’s NEVER been done. A subpoena would suffice. Why the huge show with sirens flashing etc etc? Since it’s never happened before and an action usually reserved for drug overlords etc was taken it seems wildly unlikely that it was “ necessary “.
  22. All government spending isn’t created equal. How about doubling the size of the border patrol? Nope. Massive expansion of the regulatory state ie DOUBLING the manpower of the IRS is intended to target the middle class. Yes, elites have complex returns but notice they aren’t currently the bulk of the IRS focus. There’s just not enough of them and they have lawyers to fight it out. Middle class taxpayers don’t - they settle and pay. The focus will be Uber drivers and others with a “ gig” side job , waiters , waitresses etc etc. Somebody has to pay for the lefty dream boondoggles this administration has cooked up for us. The middle class is the enemy of this administration not the elites.
  23. I hope you’re right but a lot of Dem sheep that will vote blue no matter how poorly the country is doing.
  24. Oh I’m sure she received a “ stern warning” from the same corrupt organization that lied about Trumps “ connections” to Russia. Never raided or even subpoenaed. This is a huge political stunt and you just can’t admit it. The Dems want to prevent Trump from running in 2024.
  25. No conspiracy. When your party’s goal is spend spend spend, destroy the middle class and force non elites to lower their standard of living somebody has to pay for it! Somebody ELSE of course, and that’s the middle class. They will try to bleed every cent out of us.
×
×
  • Create New...