Boatdrinks
Community Member-
Posts
17,135 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Boatdrinks
-
Correct. When you vote against tweets, you may be voting FOR terrible policy. Economic, foreign, energy etc.
-
That didn’t escape me , just surprised anyone cares at this point. Since these acts rarely take place in public I’m not sure how it’s enforceable 99.9% of the time .
-
Wild for sure. I don’t even want to know how these individuals were “caught” or charges brought. Seems like an ancient ( and ridiculous) law that was never scrubbed from the books. That’s Texas for ya.
-
I would agree with your opinion. I’m not aware of Thomas saying that these rulings should be revisited by the Court. However, I’ll take your word for it. I disagree with Thomas on that because almost no one in America wants to legislate against it in any way. It would be a complete waste of time.
-
A lot of outdated laws were probably on the books in many states at that time, and some may still be. I highly doubt these laws are ever enforced or even enforceable. Heck, Dems don’t want to enforce laws that actually affect other people and their property or physical well being. They’re too busy finding new ways to coddle criminals and hamper Police departments. I doubt there is any political will to legislate who can receive oral sex from whom. It’s just not something many people care about ; maybe they did when Leave it to Beaver was a prime time TV show. Abortion is a huge wedge issue and has been for decades.
-
I confess I’m not at all familiar with the case, so I cannot comment on it. As for Thomas, one could probably make a sound argument to that effect, but it wouldn’t mean it would/ should be outlawed. Countless “ disaster” scenarios that simply will never come to be can be imagined if one wants to. It seems a pointless exercise. Do you feel you have a “ constitutional right” to do whatever you wish, or just the freedom to do it?
-
It means there is no “ Constitutional right “ explicitly implied for a lot of things. That’s following the document. You are talking about a Supreme Court justice, who by design does not make law. Therefore he cannot “ Do” what you are describing. It’s not confusing at all. There is nothing to lose sleep over. Contraceptives are not going away.
-
Yep. The people are pretty much done with masks, but Democrat dictators and their minions believe in them forever. SARS2 is always going to be around, so they think masking is too.
-
Yes it would be to me and probably north of 90% of Americans. That’s why it won’t happen. Many ideas are extreme , but not explicitly banned by the Constitution. It doesn’t mean they have any chance of becoming law, because there is no political will by the people to do so. Condoms, the pill, plan B etc are still going to be around regardless of fear mongering politicians and their election year histrionics. We have representative government in the USA, so we generally don’t have to worry about dictators telling us what to do. Unless it’s a Dem telling us to wear a face diaper or get a jab.
-
I couldn’t disagree more. To some, following the directions as written may be “ extreme” , but it’s really quite the opposite. These appear to be very bad ideas. I doubt they would get enough support in very many states to actually become law. It’s in the hand of the people to make sure they don’t. Many horrendous laws and policies have been passed by Democrats in states they control though , so I guess anything is possible.
-
Many things are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, but that doesn’t mean they are easily banned or made illegal. It also does not create the political will of the people needed to do so. That a few extremists may exist on the fringes of our two major political parties doesn’t make such far fetched laws imminent.
-
Obviously every single issue shouldn’t be left to the states. Contraception and interracial marriage are not particularly controversial and there is no reasonable argument for them to be illegal. Those examples don’t hold much water when there is virtually zero political will behind banning them. They aren’t “ issues” on anyones radar. Lastly , I personally don’t support any nationwide law on abortion. I consider myself pro choice. Perhaps there’s a movement in the GOP for a nationwide law but I’d consider that a fools errand. Most people think it should remain legal, with restrictions after about 15 weeks.
-
So all is hunky dory in Illinois ; due at least in part to their exceptionally forward thinking government. You don’t seem like you’re fixin’ to move to Kansas anytime soon. So what’s the problem? A polarizing issue has been left to the people (i.e the states ) to decide. This is our system of government as designed by the founders of our great Nation. What is acceptable behavior in Illinois may not be in Missouri. Our Democratic Republic allows for this.
-
This is a new super-duper contagious variant out there! It’s like clockwork ; get folks scared again because the masks and restrictions are coming back. Remember the Dems and cdc said we were allowed to “ take a break” ? Well , break time’s almost over folks. There’s a huge election coming up in November and going to the polls just won’t be safe, so we’re going to need a lot of paper ballots!
-
Why do the gays love the dems so much ?
Boatdrinks replied to Teddy KGB's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Wow, it’s kinda like getting a designer breed pooch for these people. I’d say it could be a lot of things. Use your imagination. -
So they’re lying about men getting pregnant ! Who knew ?
-
I wonder if they would fill the prescription for a man, since they’re now capable of becoming pregnant.
-
Haha lol he never said to inject oneself with its bleach. More lefty lib hysteria. I watched the whole thing. Only a liberal could hear what was said and reach that conclusion. Liz Cheney, lol… another political animal. So you voted for Joe Biden because of “ Trumps crap”? Wow, you’re even dumber than I thought.
-
This is what took place. If you want to believe the testimony of political creatures who may have personal beefs with Trump etc then do so. Fraudulent unverifiable paper ballots were used. Everyone knows this because we were all told well before the election that they were being used and allowed because of “ Covid safety”.
-
Perhaps some political creatures who want to stay in Washington at all costs would testify such things but that’s about it. None of this was ever investigated fully as the Dem establishment prevented anyone from actually doing so. Again , they’re excuse was built in - there is no “ evidence” . There’s plenty of evidence if you want to find it. The official line is repeated ad infinitum to dismiss it. Everyone knows the unverifiable unrequested paper ballots were used. It’s common knowledge- Cuomo and corrupt NYS were one of the first to allow it. Are you saying that none of this happened ? We all saw it and heard it when it was announced.
-
Since the left hasn’t stopped screaming about the decision, it would seem to have plenty of punch for them.
-
Yes there was. Swing states were flooded with unrequested and unverifiable paper ballots. The “ need “ for this was pushed by the Dems immediately after the emergence of Sars2. They knew Trump was on a collision course to overwhelming victory in November of 2020 and were determined to cheat to stop it. It’s pretty obvious and not hard to figure out. The fact the ballots were unverifiable was their built in excise - there is no evidence! Even though stuffing the ballot box is one of the oldest trucks of all time.
