Jump to content

NoSaint

Community Member
  • Posts

    42,271
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NoSaint

  1. yup. A basic hiring freeze through the day after the Super Bowl would be noteworthy. both gives successful coaches a better chance to get jobs and avoids distractions
  2. yea- the tua problem is a big one. You can’t have a franchise qb that bakes in 3-4 losses due to injury. The salary cap and bfl parity don’t allow it. Especially when your division has a hall of famer at qb for your rival
  3. as a saints season ticket holder for most of his career- it was something special to watch. before his arm died the last year or two he was just such a good passer.
  4. again, playoff teams tend not to be pushovers with trash at qb and terrible coaching no dominant playmakers on offense a rookie qb Traveling across the country theres not much more you can hope for in January.
  5. you act like a rookie qb, unfamiliar with playoff football, coming off throwing against 3rd stringers won’t potentially throw a few dumb ones that he can’t actually get away with
  6. lets see that confident rookie qb try to keep up with the mvp in his house in the playoffs any playoff team is good and can win any given Sunday but this is about as good a matchup as you get
  7. chiefs make out like bandits with Pittsburgh losing the division. I liked our path so much more with them the 3 seed
  8. two deep threats, and the league leader in sacks was not my preference. I’ll let the rookie qb deal with the stress of going on the road for a shootout against the mvp for his first playoff game
  9. they probably said that about us against the Steelers backups once upon a time
  10. right but perhaps the decision wasn’t just made based on points per game but things like film prep, play design, demeanor, ability to run meetings, relationships with players and coaches, game day communication, play calling etc… if he was firing on all cylinders but they just had no real talent there are still ways to showcase your value adds in your role that isn’t just points per game
  11. also would connect back to reports that Deshaun was unable to keep up
  12. perhaps it wasn’t solely based on output but also his performance in the day to day process
  13. he took a reduction because the alternative was to get cut and struggle to find a team and absolutely have no chance to earn it back even if he signed elsewhere the dude got 5 sacks in 16 games. First off, not a great year. But also Sounds like he shouldn’t have gotten himself suspended if the 1.5m was that important to him. sit him down, and don’t give him a single pass rush.
  14. then pay him as a coach and give the spot to someone else either his spot is in the field or it’s not as a player
  15. I don’t want him running a bunch of designed keepers but I’m all good with a few drives of basic play calls and the instruction to not get himself killed. i think there is something said for a real week of practice, warmups and a few tosses to keep routine going
  16. you have to think that’s what Kincaid and Coleman were planned to back fill
  17. I mean he turned into a pleasant 800 yard guy to have. In one of the many WR threads I mentioned thinking probably a lot of people thought he’d be in that ballpark but disagreed if it would be a success or a hole for the offense. he’s a nice piece but he’s not a focal point
  18. and to post it in front of this crowd? Wild.
  19. we can only hope they pass up a mighty haul of picks to draft hunter
  20. don’t think the pats trade that pick for a boatload to someone that does? Maybe even the giants?
  21. and while Peyton drafted bush high… he wasn’t a mega contract vet. Pierre Thomas wasn’t a super well paid guy. Sproles again was toolsy but not an elite rb contract. it’s the classic I wouldn’t be shocked to see cook leave and a sneaky mid tier vet signed or mid round pick plus the existing backs.
  22. there have been a handful of posters that saw that potential to be a home run every time he touched the ball who I know are unsurprised by this season. He was a high pick for a back with a solid pedigree- the only shame is he didn’t hit his stride a little sooner. I think maybe a combo of his own issues and probably a bit of the staffs distrust of young/new guys. It would’ve been nice to get another year out of him before he leaves to his next stop.
  23. I’m more amused by this than I care to admit. debating which wash out is a better comp seems silly though basically he’s boom or bust. It’s hard to break out of the top side of that in just a few games but he hasn’t fallen out of the bottom either
  24. because a true #1 is 30+ on the market? 19 is Christian Kirk money.
×
×
  • Create New...