vincec

The obvious choice. Who wouldn''t want a peak inside that circus?

Good for him. If anybody can skip a voluntary minicamp it's him. I seriously doubt in 20 years when he looks back he will be saying "Man, I really with I had gone to that minicamp I missed."

You'd have to go with Montana because of his playoff and especially Super Bowl record, but I think Young was the better QB. He just had to deal with a loaded Dallas team during his prime that limited him to the one Super Bowl. Besides, if this poll is to determine the "franchise" QB then Montana is the obvious choice because Young never fully got out of his shadow in San Francisco. I'm sure local fans would overwhelmingly vote for Montana.

Fans don't always know best...

I was wondering the same thing. Maybe their story is that he gave them the jewelry as gifts. Otherwise, it's a pretty crazy robbery.

More squats!

It’s awesome that when someone is going through a personal tragedy there’s always a reporter to dig up the “story” and announce it to the world.

Young has always been my guy. If I had to take a QB, he'd be the guy. Over anyone.

Ferguson is second. Anyone who thinks Fitz or even Bledsoe (in Buffalo) was better than him is not adjusting their statistics across the different eras. Actually I think that Kemp would probably be second best and he's not even eligible by these rules. Favre is GBs franchise QB per the article.

Roman will get that offense humming. They're a perfect fit for each other.

Yes, in route to their crushing victory over Jacksonville.

The hall of the pretty good.

No. Maybe equal at TE, RB and DL but all other positions should be improved.

Julio Jones broke his foot too, so he’s obviously on his way to greatness.

The ball never hits the ground.

These are all really, really bad. IMO.

I think the offensive trend is salary cap driven. The general consensus among coaches is that it is easier to build a strong pass based offense than a strong run based one because it takes fewer top players to make it work. And you need the QB in either case to compete at the top level.

Where did you read about this? The media?

The Spider.

This would be true if the team that the agent thinks will pay the most is NOT the team that is "the front runner", so it's an incentive for that team to pony up before they lose out. So in this case, that logic would seem to point to a team other than Seattle being the most likely landing spot in the agents mind.

Wait, so were Zay's numbers bad because Allen was poor or did Allen have poor numbers because the WRs dropped lots of balls? Or should we just blame the OL for both and say they both got screwed?

Great post. I remember this same discussion when Andy Levitre was let go. The Bills didn't want to pay the market rate for a good OG because the position was easy to fill. Well, then why did you draft one in the second round if you weren't going to keep him if he became good?

In Chicago, the hotel tax is over 17%. Tourists don't vote in the city they're visiting and don't really know what things costs in different parts of the country so it's easy to give them the shaft.

Not just the media.

Fitz is unquestionably the best QB of the bunch. The only problem is that with Fitz as your backup, an injury to your starting QB is inevitable.