All Activity
- Past hour
-
Revoking Visas / Green Cards: Scoreboard
BillsFanNC replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
NFL is doing a bunch of early schedule release announcements Monday and Tuesday with special guests. Dion Dawkins is one of the special guests. My guess is it's related to the Bills playing at home on Christmas in the Ralph's Last regular season home game.
-
Is there an NFL team with a weaker WR group than the Bills?
Mikey152 replied to Pete's topic in The Stadium Wall
I “disappear” because I have a life that revolves around more than arguing with you over something so inconsequential. In fact, as I type this I wonder why I am even here arguing with a faceless internet troll. As for the numbers, that is the whole point. You didn’t prove anything. If you actually read the whole post (which said lie, or at best an over exaggeration) you would see that the offense had two stretches of three games where the passing offense was super productive. The first three games of the season and Sf/La/Det. The rest were kind of meh. as for your “proof” you didn’t even using passing numbers…you used offensive production. There are so many factors that go into points per game, and you literally tried to control for one variable as proof, then you made up some fake percentages with no actual evidence to back it up as to how much of it could be attributed to cooper. It’s insane. And all to prove a point. But that is the ultimate irony, isn’t it? In one post, you use how many points our offense scored to justify cooper was impactful, then in another you turn around and say our WR are trash despite our offense scoring the most points in the league. What I am realizing more and more is this is an impossible discussion because there is no logic or rules…all emotion. You feel like we have a wr problem and you will do what you have to to prove it. I, on the other hand, am just trying to understand and eventually support why Brandon Beane makes the choices he does. Big difference. cooper was a good trade. A third round pick for a guy of his caliber and a cheap contract was a good move for the Bills, regardless of how it played out. That said, he was a bust. Whether it was because he was hurt, didn’t have it anymore, or this offense just wasn’t a good fit it’s hard to say. just so we are clear, I am not running from this debate. I’m just over it. It is the same thing over and over again. It’s life sucking. So congrats. You win the war of attrition. -
You reckon he's about as big as Kincaid? Mercenary. Git 'er done!!! (fruity nature show narrator) "a seasonal harbinger akin to the swallows returning to San Juan de Capistrano... his trademark dreadlocks flowing in the breeze..."
-
Ronnie freakin' Harmon. I was 13 and my soul was crushed....
-
2025 Rookie Jersey Numbers Revealed
JohnBonhamRocks replied to KingBoots8's topic in The Stadium Wall
Unfortunately for this thread, half their jersey numbers are covered up or cropped out haha -
You are probably accurate on his market value and the point is, either he wants to win and is willing to take a home team discount or he’s the greedy douche he looks like and is only looking to get paid. I’m sure he’ll look great in a Browns uniform next year.
-
Well if you want to get into it, Revelation 21:2 states that Jesus is the “bridegroom” of the Church, consisting of all believers. The Vatican is simply the See of Rome. While it’s true that early Christian’s were persecuted, the Church still existed. Peter was the first Pope.
-
Political Violence: Where Do You Stand?
BillsFanNC replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
Thought Exercise: Best Bills QB (99-2017) who'd be JA17 backup
NoSaint replied to boyst's topic in The Stadium Wall
the only unlisted consideration is cost they are both good but at the expense of perhaps a heavy role player elsewhere? -
Trump​ ❤️ Tariffs
ComradeKayAdams replied to The Frankish Reich's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
It’s not, though! We can’t just redefine socialism to mean “any government economic interventionism that we don’t like” or “a centrally planned economy.” In Trump’s economy, the workers definitely don’t own the means of production. Corporate oligarchs still have all the power and control the flow of wealth generation. Moreover, I automatically distrust the motives of any neoliberal or libertarian author attempting to equate Trump’s economy with socialism. Most Americans still associate the social democratic policies of Bernie/AOC with that of “socialism,” and so the (inevitable) failure of Trump’s economy can then somehow be blamed on the Democratic Party’s progressive wing. It’s quite the predictable ploy we have grown to expect from our country’s corporate media! Let’s all be clear on how progressive tariffs would differ from Trumpian tariffs. A three-stage plan from progressives: 1. Carefully crafted prior labor regulations that foster an environment for competitive wage growth and healthy work conditions. 2. Keynesian stimulus packages to expedite foundational shovels-in-the-ground projects and workforce training (a good example: 2022 CHIPS Act). 3. Targeted tariffs applied to a specific and limited set of overseas industries (chosen for reasons like national security and domestic macroeconomic growth balance). And by comparison, a three-stage plan from Trump: 1. Broad tariffs imposed on every country and trade ally, with nonsensical and often exorbitant rates. 2. Nose picking as prices predictably soar and markets collapse. 3. Removal of tariff impositions, accompanied with braggadocious “art of the deal” claims. Two key reasons why you should have known all along that Trump was an economic charlatan: 1. He thinks trade “deficits” are inherently bad, as if this kind of deficit is in any way similar to a personal/family budgetary “deficit!” 2. He claims his tariffs are to be used for tax revenue generation, even though successfully applied tariffs are intended to do the exact opposite…INHIBIT international consumption of goods! Kay’s Super Profound Conclusion: So what’s REALLY going on here?? Well, some people in America are certainly benefiting from Trump’s economic machinations! In the progressive vernacular, these people are referred to as “corporate oligarchs.” Others will be much worse off, due to the regressive taxation effect of widespread price inflation on consumer goods (followed by macroeconomic contraction). Let’s call this group the “99%.” So now Little Susie gets 3 dolls for her birthday instead of 30, Little Joey gets 5 pencils for school instead of 250, and Commie Kay gets maybe only a few dozen Squishmallows (at most) for her new queen size bed instead of THOUSANDS. I think I speak for Susie and Joey when I say, “BLEEP you, MAGA Commies!!!” -
From a PBS interview last night. I couldn't agree more. Rev. Thomas Reese: Well, of course, he's been elected pope for the whole world, so he's got to deal with all the world, not just the United States. But because of his knowledge of the United States, I think he will be focused on it. What can we do to reach out to young people? How can we make the church more inviting? Pope Francis was wonderful, but the problem was everybody said to themselves, gee, I wish I had Pope Francis as my pastor. And then they would go into their parish and they often didn't find Pope Francis. So I think that what Pope Leo has to do is help the clergy in the United States get on board with the vision that Pope Francis has, and now the vision that Pope Leo is bringing to the church.
-
Trump​ ❤️ Tariffs
leh-nerd skin-erd replied to The Frankish Reich's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
You worry about the Maple Leafs seceding, we’ll worry about the Penguins. -
I do like the single digits on wr and secondary guys and I noticed that teams are starting to give kickers and punters terrible numbers. Bass's 2 would look much better on someone else. So would Shane Buechele's 6. I love LBs in the 50s and DL in the 90s
-
Thought Exercise: Best Bills QB (99-2017) who'd be JA17 backup
sunshynman replied to boyst's topic in The Stadium Wall
We had the best in Peterman and let him walk away! -
Fixed it for you. It's all corrupt, the Vatican is no different. Humans mess things up, that's why we need God and the only way to Him is through Jesus.
-
Is there an NFL team with a weaker WR group than the Bills?
Kirby Jackson replied to Pete's topic in The Stadium Wall
Production for sure. The WR room has COMBINED for 2 seasons over 800 yards!! Please go through every single team in the league and tell me how many have less? The answer will almost certainly be 0. Shakir is the only guy that’s a top 50 WR in the NFL and he’s probably in the 30 range. If you were to draft every NFL WR start to finish he probably goes around 30 and they may not have another guy picked until 65 or later. There are 32 teams in the league. I’ll throw pedigree in as well. Moore was an early 2 but has disappointed to this point. Coleman was an early 2 but the 8th or 9th WR off the board in his own draft class. Did you he get pushed down because of the strength of the class or pushed up because of the run of them before the next tier dropped off? Palmer was a 3. Shakir was a 5. Samuel was a RB. The pedigree of the Bills WR room pales in comparison to pretty much every team. We went through early in the year using draft trade chart points and how many were allocated to WR. It’s incredibly low. Cooper doesn’t get a pass. He didn’t look like the player he was a year earlier. What, for some reason, is so difficult for you to understand, if the Bills passing game was WAY better in the games he played. You tried to spin that and then I posted the numbers. You then disappeared for 2 days because the truth exposed your narrative. The offense was way better with him. Period. Diggs’ numbers dipped. Diggs also had the best 4 year stretch a Bills receiver ever had. The passing game was better when he was here. There’s no doubt about that. He wasn’t the same player at the end, but if he walked through the door today, coming off the ACL, he’d be the number 1. I challenge you to find any metrics supporting the WRs not being bottom 5. 🤣🤣 There aren’t any other than hope. The OL is excellent. Brady is great. Josh Allen is the best player in football. The WRs are bad compared to other NFL WR groups. Why do you refuse to accept the truth? It doesn’t mean that the Bills can’t produce. Those other factors may be enough to overcome them. It was enough last year. Let’s hope it continues. As an aside, in the future, if you’re going to call someone a liar, please make sure that the numbers won’t tell a different story. You lost a lot of credibility on here trying to spin reality. Whether we agree or not, doesn’t matter. Don’t argue against facts!! The passing game with Cooper was way better than the passing game without. That’s how this whole conversation started. You said that didn’t happen. The numbers said it did. -
look around American politics...
-
My sister (give it up for my sistas) Give it up for my sistas Give it up for my sistas You're all I need Princess of the Nile, an' sweet black sexy child Ooh, I like your style, huh First mother on the planet, I know it's gettin' scary And all these wannabe pimps is all that ya meet But ya gotta shake 'em off like fleas an' n—— meat And use your God-given talents and abilities
-
Who is our worst match up in the AFC as of now?
Another Fan replied to Mikie2times's topic in The Stadium Wall
The answer to this question will always be the Chiefs to me until the Bills dethrone them when it matters. -
Where's all my soul sista's? Lemme hear y'all flow sista's Hey sista', go sista', soul sista', flow sista' (uh) Hey sista', go sista', soul sista', go sista' He met Marmalade down in old Moulin Rouge Struttin' her stuff on the street She said, "Hello, hey Joe! You wanna give it a go?" Oh! Uh-huh