Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
32 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:


 

If this is true, and I will say if, the Bills need to bring in Paul as LB # 5 and move Shaq Thompson  to the PS 

 

Worth noting the Bills met with him in Indy and also had a private workout session with him.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
1 hour ago, JerseyBills said:

Also worth noting - 

 

 

These players are getting progressively more aggressive with their prices and refusing to play out their contracts 

I'm okay with that.

 

The rules don't apply to the billionaire owners, who are in general garbage humans, so I fully support any player doing whatever he can to get his. We're all supposed to want a free market, right?

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, QCity said:

Worth noting the Bills met with him in Indy and also had a private workout session with him.

 

The Rams are cutting a LB they drafted in the 5th round this year????

 

(tries not to type the name Shaun Dolac)

 

😆

 

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Captain Hindsight said:

The Bills have no interest in developing a QB. It’s why Trubisky, who has not shot to start anywhere else, is the backup. Because he has played a ton of football and can help QB1 succeed. He can step in a run an offense on no reps and be successful. 
 

How many 5th round QB develop behind starters like Allen and are traded for assets? 1 in 15 years? It’s simply not worth it. Give me a shot at Milano or Taron Johnson than a QB who would be behind a guy who hasn’t missed a game since 2018


You can have no interest in developing a QB, no dispute there. But when you have a superstar QB, the development comes from mentoring and guidance from the guy above him as much as it does coaching staff. The point isn’t about drafting a guy to replace or “become the next Josh” but rather an insurance policy incase something happens because if it does this team isn’t going to win much. 
 

The point isn’t every year but once in a while to take a flier on a guy you have as that insurance or are able to exchange for future draft pick/s to get another shot at a Milano, Taron, Shakir or Benford…

 

Mitch was dreadful in Pittsburgh, a team that is very friendly for a QB. They moved on to Kenny Pickett because he wasn’t doing enough, which even then had to be pretty minimal. If you believe Mitch can be successful at leading us to multiple wins if Josh is unavailable, more power to you. I was in that camp prior to his Pittsburgh 2 year deal. Not anymore. There’s better options out there. Grooming a backup versus a guy who’s played a ton of football and done so very averagely since his Sophomore year seems like a smarter option. Especially when you revert it back to your point about rather having a chance at more late round gems; you could get something for him. 

Edited by Sojourner
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 2
Posted

Agent 47 is a wise , old soul 

I was partying,  chasing women at 25 , can'timagine how crazy i would've gotten with his $ , I try to give back now at 35 but still party.. This dude is special 

 

  • Agree 6
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Sojourner said:


You can have no interest in developing a QB, no dispute there. But when you have a superstar QB, the development comes from mentoring and guidance from the guy above him as much as it does coaching staff. The point isn’t about drafting a guy to replace or “become the next Josh” but rather an insurance policy incase something happens because if it does this team isn’t going to win much. 
 

The point isn’t every year but once in a while to take a flier on a guy you have as that insurance or are able to exchange for future draft pick/s to get another shot at a Milano, Taron, Shakir or Benford…

 

Mitch was dreadful in Pittsburgh, a team that is very friendly for a QB. They moved on to Kenny Pickett because he wasn’t doing enough, which even then had to be pretty minimal. If you believe Mitch can be successful at leading us to multiple wins if Josh is unavailable, more power to you. I was in that camp prior to his Pittsburgh 2 year deal. Not anymore. There’s better options out there. Grooming a backup versus a guy who’s played a ton of football and done so very averagely since his Sophomore year seems like a smarter option. Especially when you revert it back to your point about rather having a chance at more late round gems; you could get something for him. 



I have 2 issues with the above:

 

1) When Mitch was in Pittsburgh it was with Canada as OC and it was hilariously bad for QBs.  None of the QBs played well and guys that had been there got worse.  With the o-line and lack of creativity, Mitch looked just like all the other QBs in Pittsburgh.  He will be fine for his role here.

 

2) The reason they don’t draft many QBs is because of roster builds.  They do not want a QB that needs time to develop taking up a roster spot and they are correct.  The Bills keep 2 QB on the roster and want a starter and a guy they can insert and hold on to a win if required.  They also want an experienced QB that can talk with Josh and they can see what the defense is doing to make adjustments.

 

People would lose their minds had the Bills wasted a 5th rd pick on a guy like Milton just to cut and try to put on the PS.  If they are going with a young QB, they want an UDFA or 7th round guy that can go to the PS and develop and they have that in Shane.  The return also hasn’t been worth it.  Milton and another player were traded for a 5th rd pick that was barely 20 spots in front of where he was picked.  NE lost value overall on the trade and although they have drafted several QBs since near the end of Brady - very few have even netted anything close to the draft capital and has been an over net negative.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 3
Posted
6 hours ago, Dick_Cheney said:

I'm okay with that.

 

The rules don't apply to the billionaire owners, who are in general garbage humans, so I fully support any player doing whatever he can to get his. We're all supposed to want a free market, right?


User name does NOT check out. 

  • Haha (+1) 5
Posted (edited)
On 8/24/2025 at 6:53 PM, Ya Digg? said:

Everything I have heard about Milton this preseason is how poorly he has played. He’s not the answer at backup QB 

 

The Cowboys reddit page had a thread about two weeks ago where they were discussing if he was the worst player they'd ever seen.  

Edited by Brandon
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
11 hours ago, JerseyBills said:

Also worth noting - 

 

 

These players are getting progressively more aggressive with their prices and refusing to play out their contracts 

 

Players today know their worth.  They also know they have a small window to secure their post-NFL financial futures, so they are willing to play hard ball with ownership,  especially when they play positions where salaries have exploded in the last 2 or 3 years.

 

3 hours ago, Rochesterfan said:



I have 2 issues with the above:

 

1) When Mitch was in Pittsburgh it was with Canada as OC and it was hilariously bad for QBs.  None of the QBs played well and guys that had been there got worse.  With the o-line and lack of creativity, Mitch looked just like all the other QBs in Pittsburgh.  He will be fine for his role here.

 

2) The reason they don’t draft many QBs is because of roster builds.  They do not want a QB that needs time to develop taking up a roster spot and they are correct.  The Bills keep 2 QB on the roster and want a starter and a guy they can insert and hold on to a win if required.  They also want an experienced QB that can talk with Josh and they can see what the defense is doing to make adjustments.

 

People would lose their minds had the Bills wasted a 5th rd pick on a guy like Milton just to cut and try to put on the PS.  If they are going with a young QB, they want an UDFA or 7th round guy that can go to the PS and develop and they have that in Shane.  The return also hasn’t been worth it.  Milton and another player were traded for a 5th rd pick that was barely 20 spots in front of where he was picked.  NE lost value overall on the trade and although they have drafted several QBs since near the end of Brady - very few have even netted anything close to the draft capital and has been an over net negative.

 

 

 

 

Trubiskey looked significantly better in the pre-season than he did in Pittsburgh or even last season with the Bills.  I think that the Bills roster is considerably better than many on TSW think it is, and Trubiskey helps make it better.  He's highly unlikely to be able to win 5 or 6 games if Allen was out, but I think he could lead the Bills to 3 or 4 wins out of 6 games, depending upon the opponents.  I don't think any team with a high caliber starting QB like Allen could ask for much more if their backup QB has to play a string of games.

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

 

 

1 minute ago, MPL said:

 

 


Someone come up with a good headline that riffs on Boogie Nights 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, RiotAct said:

Git ‘er done, Beane!

Basham is one of those unique players where is floor and his ceiling are at the same place.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...