Jump to content

Traditional vs. 'Modern Day' X Receiver


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said:

I'd like some level of elite traits.  Size for jump balls and radius for josh allens... we'll call it "inconsistent" ball placement.  Speed to create deep separation.  Elite ball tracking on deep balls.  Something that isnt just - he does a lot of stuff well.  

 

The bolded is AD Mitchell IMO. He is the classic he does a lot of stuff well, but I am not sure what the special trait is.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GunnerBill said:

 

The bolded is AD Mitchell IMO. He is the classic he does a lot of stuff well, but I am not sure what the special trait is.

 

yeah - at 28 i don't hate that because you can potentially move them into a #2 type role target-wise and they'll continue to be a good player while you chase traits either next year or with a later pick.  I'm just reluctant to go fishing for that guy.   

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrags said:

I never said there was. I’m simply expressing what I think Bills brass is thinking 

God I hope not bud. Most of his highlights are on a clean release off the LOS.

 

Last thing I want is a primary receiver who can't beat a bump and run or physical DB because he's too light in the arse and can't fight for position and contested catches.

 

I do believe he can thrive but it'll have to be in an offensive scheme where he's not the focus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mrags said:

The more I think about this, the more I think that if the Bills don’t trade up and stay at 28 they will be taking Worthy. 

Maybe put out some fake news and say he was in the car with Sweat so he can drop in the draft too😎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are three Alpha dog receivers with elite traits in this draft. The Bills brass and everyone else knows who they are. The question is can we can get one somehow this draft because they incredibly rare- think Jamar Chase. The rest of the Wrs in this draft look much better as a complement to the  big dogs. The BIlls of course need 2 receivers this draft, I'm hoping an Alpha and one of the next tier guys. With 2 guys on rookie contracts we are ready to roll for awhile.

Edited by D. L. Hot-Flamethrower
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Solomon Grundy said:

Maybe put out some fake news and say he was in the car with Sweat so he can drop in the draft too😎

lol. If worthy does go before we pick it will be glorious. 
 

1st, we won’t end up with him 

 

2nd, it will make someone else available 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Diggs was not a traditional X receiver and that role was more in line with what Davis did for the team. Diggs played some X but he made his money by being a move receiver. A lot of it has to do with coaching too. All receivers must have a pretty extensive route tree or they don't make it on this team. The route concepts have all of the receivers running different kinds of routes from play to play.  Sometimes lining up on the opposite side, sometimes it's a bunch formation. We wanted Davis to run more routes but he seemed to only excel at deep routes and even then the consistency wasn't there.

 

I tend to think that defenses did a great job of taking away the deep routes and forced Josh to hit shorter routes and run the ball more. Even though Diggs wasn't a tradition X, he was still #1 WR on this team.  I look at receivers like Tyreek Hill, who is only 5'10" 191 lbs and he is a #1 WR. It seems today's #1s come in a lot of sizes. I believe speed is desirable along with separation ability and perhaps most importantly an ability to catch almost anything thrown their way. Doesn't matter how big they are as long as they can produce. 

 

I would love to see more seam routes for our TEs. Keep those safeties in the middle of the field covering them and leaving boundary WRs 1 on 1. Or using a TE to cut short toward the sideline while a WR is running deep over the top of him.  Make those safeties guess on every passing down. Don't let them sit back and take the deep ball away all game. Make one come up into the box.  I think Buffalo has some great route concepts, but couldn't expand because of limited ability. Pretty sure the draft will address some of these issues.

 

Be prepared for a lot of presnap motion under Brady. Hope he doesn't get too gadgety....haha. At the same time, I'm anxious to see what he draws up. I'm not sure a tradition X is what gives us the boost we need. It will be a team effort though that takes us over the top. A stud X might be it or maybe not. Might be more of a Diggs 2.0, or a Hill 2.0. A big X that catches more than Davis is certainly a boost but is it a replacement for Diggs production? Going to be an interesting year for sure. Just hope whoever they get is worthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said:

There are three Alpha dog receivers with elite traits in this draft. The Bills brass and everyone else knows who they are. The question is can we can get one somehow this draft because they incredibly rare- think Jamar Chase. The rest of the Wrs in this draft look much better as a complement to the  big dogs. The BIlls of course need 2 receivers this draft, I'm hoping an Alpha and one of the next tier guys. With 2 guys one rookie contracts we are ready to roll for awhile.

Don't think they need two in this draft. They need to land one "alpha," as you put it. They already have 4 other starters catching the other passes (Kincaid, Jimbo, Samuel, Shakir....and also Knox...). If they draft another receiver late and he turns out good, that would be icing on the cake, but not a need.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LeGOATski said:

Don't think they need two in this draft. They need to land one "alpha," as you put it. They already have 4 other starters catching the other passes (Kincaid, Jimbo, Samuel, Shakir....and also Knox...). If they draft another receiver late and he turns out good, that would be icing on the cake, but not a need.

Did you think they needed one before Diggs was traded, or were you content to take a late round receiver? Because otherwise, I think trading Diggs implies two is better than one. 

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr. Who said:

Did you think they needed one before Diggs was traded, or were you content to take a late round receiver? Because otherwise, I think trading Diggs implies two is better than one. 

No, it was either keep Diggs and add a guy like Samuel, or upgrade from Diggs and add a guy like Samuel.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I've always thought of it:

-the X receiver excels in the vertical dimension (hitches, go routes, fades)
-the Y receiver excels in the horizontal dimension (drags, crosses, ins and outs)

-the Z receiver excels in both dimensions (aka "the true #1")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LeGOATski said:

No, it was either keep Diggs and add a guy like Samuel, or upgrade from Diggs and add a guy like Samuel.

I don't see Samuel as a Davis replacement, so I don't see that move as addressing the loss of the boundary receiver, or now Diggs.

Unless you think Shakir can take over for Davis, I think you still need two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said:

I'd like some level of elite traits.  Size for jump balls and radius for josh allens... we'll call it "inconsistent" ball placement.  Speed to create deep separation.  Elite ball tracking on deep balls.  Something that isnt just - he does a lot of stuff well.  


These kinds of dudes are rare - but probably super valuable here, given what else is on the roster. Think DK Metcalf.  
 

What’s interesting is that in the modern game they’re probably not gonna really reach elite status and they’re fairly limited in what they can do. Like DK won’t run routes that require sharp cuts. He runs posts, flys, crossers, and deep outs.  That’s gonna be Justin Shorter as well. 
 

Jahan Dotson probably profiles as your average X these days. 6-1, and he wins with quickness and moves and route running rather than physicality 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

I don't see Samuel as a Davis replacement, so I don't see that move as addressing the loss of the boundary receiver, or now Diggs.

Unless you think Shakir can take over for Davis, I think you still need two.

We need two because you can’t put that much pressure on Shakir to be a borderline all pro. 
 

In the past the bills could get away with just 5 WRs because of how good Diggs and Davis were. They’re gonna need 6 or 7 IMO 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, appoo said:


These kinds of dudes are rare - but probably super valuable here, given what else is on the roster. Think DK Metcalf.  
 

What’s interesting is that in the modern game they’re probably not gonna really reach elite status and they’re fairly limited in what they can do. Like DK won’t run routes that require sharp cuts. He runs posts, flys, crossers, and deep outs.  That’s gonna be Justin Shorter as well. 
 

Jahan Dotson probably profiles as your average X these days. 6-1, and he wins with quickness and moves and route running rather than physicality 

 

He definitely profiles as average......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Modern NFL offenses are less rigid on roles than they once were.   Bills have TEs and RBs who can play the X, WRs who can run the ball, Slots who can X, etc.  Scheme it up and throw it to the guy with the mismatch, Josh.    All this X, Y and Z stuff is much less relevant in today's NFL.   With Josh's arm, give me guys who can separate and catch and I'm good.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of what you call these guys, every team needs a variety of possession receivers who can separate quickly, with good hands to catch the contested balls that naturally come from shorter routes. (Diggs)
 

Next, every team needs at least one guy who can stretch the defense deep (even if they rarely throw it to him). Someone who can keep the safeties from crowding the line. (Davis)

 

Finally, every team needs a crafty possession receiver in the slot who’s not afraid to go over the middle for a few short yards when you absolutely have to move the chains. (Beasley)
 

Do the Bills currently have all three? If so, who are they? And more importantly if they don’t who’s the rookie to fill the specific hole? 

Edited by SoCal Deek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Modern day? Alignment rules are alignment rules...

 

You need an eligible receiver on each side of the line of scrimmage. They can be close to the ball (tight) or far (split). Either way, they have to line up on scrimmage, which means they cannot be in motion at the snap and the defense can touch them immediately upon the snap...so press man is always an option for covering them. Because of those realities, you'd like your ends to be able to hold up physically.

 

Because tight ends play often play in line and block LB and DL, it is obvious that they should be bigger. Split Ends, on the other hand, usually only have to fight off CB so "bigger" is relative and there is probably a point where they can be too big, especially if it inhibits their explosiveness after the initial 5 yards.

 

Flat out, it is hard to scheme open a split end. If the defense wants to play press man, you can't really stop it. So the most valuable guys at that spot are guys that don't need a scheme to help them get open against any kind of coverage...and those guys tend to be big and fast because they need to be physical and explosive, depending on the coverage. If they aren't physical enough to get off a press, or not explosive enough to eat up a cushion, well then they can be taken away easily and your offense loses a target and that player is kind of a waste.

 

Side note...this is one of the underrated aspects of a two TE offense where both TE are effective pass catchers...it negates the need for a true Split end if both TE line up on the ball...the rest of you eligible receivers no longer have to and you take away their ability to press man on the outside if you want.

Edited by Mikey152
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...