Mike in Horseheads Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 1 minute ago, Niagara Dude said: I'm ok trading him if we can get a first, even a lower first and continue to get this team younger. Were not getting a first for him, maybe a 3rd, you know the one that suddenly disappeared from the comp picks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomur67 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 I would guess he sees his close friends suddenly leaving and thinking it easily could be him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 What would his trade value be ? He is about to turn 30 …and you gotta pay him $15m+ a year as well.. 3rd? Doesn’t make a lot of sense .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 1 minute ago, Aussie Joe said: What would his trade value be ? He is about to turn 30 …and you gotta pay him $15m+ a year as well.. 3rd? Doesn’t make a lot of sense .. Pro-Bowl caliber LT’s don’t grow on trees. I think there would be legit compensation. If that’s what this is… Kromer must love Van Demark. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 Just now, SCBills said: Pro-Bowl caliber LT’s don’t grow on trees. I think there would be legit compensation. If that’s what this is… Kromer must love Van Demark. I put him as a 10-15 guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 3 minutes ago, HurlyBurly51 said: This is rich. Yeah, there's absolutely no difference between the *GM* of the team, who makes the decisions of a players future, *specifically* talking about the future of a player at a position that is overly crowded and a player with little reason to be traded themselves tweeting out something "cryptic" 🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo03 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 16 minutes ago, TheBrownBear said: Wait, you're telling me Millennials have pubes now? Have for nearly 40 years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills742 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt_In_NH Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 18 minutes ago, Mike in Horseheads said: Were not getting a first for him, maybe a 3rd, you know the one that suddenly disappeared from the comp picks what if someone offered a low to mid 2nd? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ya Digg? Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 This place is so weird. When Bates got traded people were disappointed the Bills only got a 5th for him. Now people are speculating that Dawkins might get traded and they might only get a 3rd for him? THIS IS WHY NOBODY HERE IS A GM!!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike in Horseheads Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 2 minutes ago, Matt_In_NH said: what if someone offered a low to mid 2nd? Unless they want to sign him at a reasonable amount, I'd take it 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 45 minutes ago, Steptide said: Cutting/trading him would be absolutely stupid Imo and would really make me question beanes decision making. He's one of the best left tackles in the nfl and a crucial peice to Josh Allen. Why on earth would they get rid of him IMO it only happens if Beane sees his value as Top 15 LT and Dion/agent demand Top 5 LT $ 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike in Horseheads Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 6 minutes ago, Ya Digg? said: This place is so weird. When Bates got traded people were disappointed the Bills only got a 5th for him. Now people are speculating that Dawkins might get traded and they might only get a 3rd for him? THIS IS WHY NOBODY HERE IS A GM!!!! Do you think he's worth a 1st? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ya Digg? Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 1 minute ago, Mike in Horseheads said: Do you think he's worth a 1st? Oh I do - I find it odd that people severely overvalued a rarely used backup lineman but then put such low value onto the starting left tackle who (take it for what it's worth) made the pro bowl on multiple occasions 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 19 minutes ago, bills742 said: Extension highly likely then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan in Owego Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 2 minutes ago, Mike in Horseheads said: Do you think he's worth a 1st? Not with this group of OT prospects that will be drafted in the 1st. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Who Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Extension highly likely then They for sure are not going to create a hole at LT when they already have a big task ahead of them to field a solid team. I think it means they are going to open up enough space to make a somewhat bigger move in free agency, but even if it's not that, it isn't trading away a key piece of the best Oline you've had in years. Especially after letting Morse go. It makes absolutely no sense. Edited March 9 by Dr. Who 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Romes Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 Maybe they are rolling the dice with Vandy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 7 minutes ago, Ya Digg? said: Oh I do - I find it odd that people severely overvalued a rarely used backup lineman but then put such low value onto the starting left tackle who (take it for what it's worth) made the pro bowl on multiple occasions I would trade him for a 1st if anyone is offering,,, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 2 hours ago, The Wiz said: here you go. The nice part is they don't know who Gene Wilder is so it's even better. Millenials definitely know who Gene Wilder is. They’re in their mid 30’s to mid-40’s. They aren’t kids and haven’t been for a long time. For whatever reason whenever somebody ages out of knowing how to use technology every young person in the world going forward is whatever the young generation was at that time. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.