Jump to content

Gabe Davis- Do you want him back and for how much $


NewEra

Do you want to resign Gabe Davis- If so, how much should we pay him?  

408 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want Gabe Davis back? If so, for how much $?

    • No- I don’t want him back- I’m over him.
    • Yes- but as a WR3-5 and under 5M aav
    • Yes- He’s an average WR2- I’d pay him 5-9M aav
    • Yes- He’s a good WR2- I’d pay him 9m+ aav


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mrags said:

So, to be clear. Out of all the guys in the league. You would rather have 9 guys than Davis. And push at 11. 
 

and my argument is that he’s easily top 50% of #2s in this league. And without looking, I’d imagine he’s got similar yards to at least half of them. And more TDs than most of them. And he was completely MIA for 4-5 games. 
 

I understand what you’re saying. I’m just saying, after all that, you could only come up with 9 guys that you absolutely would rather have than Davis. I would argue that when some of those guys contracts are up, Waddle, Higgins, Smith, Addison, they will all be paid like #1s and are likely considered #1s. 
 

Davis is not a bad #2. The problem is peoples expectations of what a #2 actually is. For the 9 number 2s that you pointed out I bet I could find at least 5+ number 1s that he’s clearly better than. 

I think we basically agree

 

I just think the top teams tend to have better options at that spot

 

As far as Davis' particular skillset and how it impact the offense goes 😂😂 that's a longer conversation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mrags said:

So, to be clear. Out of all the guys in the league. You would rather have 9 guys than Davis. And push at 11. 
 

and my argument is that he’s easily top 50% of #2s in this league. And without looking, I’d imagine he’s got similar yards to at least half of them. And more TDs than most of them. And he was completely MIA for 4-5 games. 
 

I understand what you’re saying. I’m just saying, after all that, you could only come up with 9 guys that you absolutely would rather have than Davis. I would argue that when some of those guys contracts are up, Waddle, Higgins, Smith, Addison, they will all be paid like #1s and are likely considered #1s. 
 

Davis is not a bad #2. The problem is peoples expectations of what a #2 actually is. For the 9 number 2s that you pointed out I bet I could find at least 5+ number 1s that he’s clearly better than. 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/stats/player/_/stat/receiving/table/receiving/sort/receivingYards/dir/desc

 

This is just total receiving yards on the year and I would be hard pressed to find anybody on that list I'm not taking over Gabe. It's about route running. We can't afford to have our #2 option only running routes downfield. Hell, Shakir is debatable as far as who you take. At least Shakir can run the full tree. Davis is a niche player for us which is why he can just be taken out of games. No thanks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

I think we basically agree

 

I just think the top teams tend to have better options at that spot

 

As far as Davis' particular skillset and how it impact the offense goes 😂😂 that's a longer conversation 

Yes. I think the top. Super pass heavy teams. Usually the teams with 2 studs at WR have better options. But only until they become FAs. Like I mentioned. Out of those players you’ve mentioned. I doubt Higgins staying Cincy. He’ll be paid true #1 money elsewhere. When Waddle is up for contract he will get the same. Godwin is too old for that boat. So is Kirk but he already got that treatment years ago. Those teams got lucky by drafting studs and getting multiple players on team friendly, or rookie deals. It won’t last long. 
 

as far as Davis’ skill set. That depends on what you want out of a WR. But I’d guess that McConservative absolutely finds Davis’ skillset to be extremely important. He’s a good blocker. For a conservative run heavy team. Lol

11 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/stats/player/_/stat/receiving/table/receiving/sort/receivingYards/dir/desc

 

This is just total receiving yards on the year and I would be hard pressed to find anybody on that list I'm not taking over Gabe. It's about route running. We can't afford to have our #2 option only running routes downfield. Hell, Shakir is debatable as far as who you take. At least Shakir can run the full tree. Davis is a niche player for us which is why he can just be taken out of games. No thanks.  

Ugh. Just stop. He’s 39th in the league in yards on that list. You do realize that each team has 2 starting WRs? You do realize that there’s 32 teams in the league? You do know that 32x2 is 64? So obviously he is in the midway point of #2s in the league. Even better than some #1s. Justin Jefferson is below him on that list so he must be better than Justin Jefferson right? 
 

and with all joking aside. He’s top 10 for TDs in the ENTIRE LEAGUE. You can’t ask for much more than that out of a #2 

  • Disagree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, mrags said:

Yes. I think the top. Super pass heavy teams. Usually the teams with 2 studs at WR have better options. But only until they become FAs. Like I mentioned. Out of those players you’ve mentioned. I doubt Higgins staying Cincy. He’ll be paid true #1 money elsewhere. When Waddle is up for contract he will get the same. Godwin is too old for that boat. So is Kirk but he already got that treatment years ago. Those teams got lucky by drafting studs and getting multiple players on team friendly, or rookie deals. It won’t last long. 
 

as far as Davis’ skill set. That depends on what you want out of a WR. But I’d guess that McConservative absolutely finds Davis’ skillset to be extremely important. He’s a good blocker. For a conservative run heavy team. Lol

Ugh. Just stop. He’s 39th in the league in yards on that list. You do realize that each team has 2 starting WRs? You do realize that there’s 32 teams in the league? You do know that 32x2 is 64? So obviously he is in the midway point of #2s in the league. Even better than some #1s. Justin Jefferson is below him on that list so he must be better than Justin Jefferson right? 
 

and with all joking aside. He’s top 10 for TDs in the ENTIRE LEAGUE. You can’t ask for much more than that out of a #2 

Ughh, no dude. Just because his production rate is above league average for a #2 doesn’t mean he can run an in route. His ability to impact a game is measured more by his ability to threaten a defense which he can only do over the top and no, I don’t want my #2 WR to only be a vertical threat. Your analysis doesn’t factor in multiple things that are relevant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mikie2times said:

Ughh, no dude. Just because his production rate is above league average for a #2 doesn’t mean he can run an in route. His ability to impact a game is measured more by his ability to threaten a defense which he can only do over the top and no, I don’t want my #2 WR to only be a vertical threat. Your analysis doesn’t factor in multiple things that are relevant. 

What IS RELEVANT, is that he’s got more TDs in the league than everyone but like 8 players at the position. In an argument, details matter. And the details are that Gabe is more effective and more important to this team than you think. 
 

with that being said, I still don’t want him back at the rate the HE WILL demand and receive from some team out there.  
 

merry Christmas 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrags said:

What IS RELEVANT, is that he’s got more TDs in the league than everyone but like 8 players at the position. In an argument, details matter. And the details are that Gabe is more effective and more important to this team than you think. 
 

with that being said, I still don’t want him back at the rate the HE WILL demand and receive from some team out there.  
 

merry Christmas 

All you’re measuring is production. He has the deepest average depth of target in the NFL. Which is because he can only run half the route tree. Which means he can only assist our offense in routes past 15 yards. Which makes our offense extremely inconsistent. This isn’t baseball. You can’t just look at a players stat line and not evaluate it as far as how it impacts the rest of the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:

All you’re measuring is production. He has the deepest average depth of target in the NFL. Which is because he can only run half the route tree. Which means he can only assist our offense in routes past 15 yards. Which makes our offense extremely inconsistent. This isn’t baseball. You can’t just look at a players stat line and not evaluate it as far as how it impacts the rest of the team. 

K. Merry Christmas 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think anyone would have a problem keeping Gabe at the right price, but that’s the problem. He’s going to get premium WR2 money and I don’t think McBeane are going to pay that to a guy who disappears for 4 games at a time and has a limited skill set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, RunTheBall said:

I don’t think anyone would have a problem keeping Gabe at the right price, but that’s the problem. He’s going to get premium WR2 money and I don’t think McBeane are going to pay that to a guy who disappears for 4 games at a time and has a limited skill set.

This. I’d bet Gabe earns top 3 money for all the FA WRs his season. Higgins and Evans will get more. And I don’t even know who else is available. But I bet he gets paid top 3. Definitely top 5. And let’s be real, Higgins is a 1. Evans is a 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrags said:

This. I’d bet Gabe earns top 3 money for all the FA WRs his season. Higgins and Evans will get more. And I don’t even know who else is available. But I bet he gets paid top 3. Definitely top 5. And let’s be real, Higgins is a 1. Evans is a 1. 

Spotrac says he could get $13.5 AAV in Free Agency.  If he does that Diggs will probably have his agent speed dialing Beane.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...