Jump to content

Defending the brotherly shove


Matt_In_NH

Recommended Posts

Watching the chiefs game.  I really think the eagles are successful because all guys on offense are working together to push Hurts into the endZone while the defense has a bunch of individuals trying to make a play.   It seems like the defense should match power with power and defenders should push the DTs. No idea if it would work but why not try something different since literally nothing works to defend it.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thread was started the other day on the tush push, and I’ll repeat what I wrote there.  The referees strategy to slow this down is they are watching encroachment closely as the O Linemen on the Eagles sometimes cheat the LOS.

 

It’s a topic of debate as the potential threat to players neck is high with all of those bodies.  It will probably go away after the year.  A traditional QB sneak is just fine and perfectly legal.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, machine gun kelly said:

Another thread was started the other day on the tush push, and I’ll repeat what I wrote there.  The referees strategy to slow this down is they are watching encroachment closely as the O Linemen on the Eagles sometimes cheat the LOS.

 

It’s a topic of debate as the potential threat to players neck is high with all of those bodies.  It will probably go away after the year.  A traditional QB sneak is just fine and perfectly legal.

I would wholeheartedly ban the pushing of any player feom behind whether they be an offensive or defensive player.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spiderweb said:

I would wholeheartedly ban the pushing of any player feom behind whether they be an offensive or defensive player.

Always used to be illegal, until a few years ago…”aiding the runner”.  It’s a matter of time before someone (probably a DT) gets his neck broken in one of those scrums.  It needs to be outlawed now, but the NFL cares nothing about player safety.

Edited by mannc
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see the league banning it *except* on goal-line plays, with the safety angle being “we’re reducing the number of plays where it can be used.”  The league wants scoring, but nobody wants to see that play over and over on 4th and 1 at midfield.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BRH said:

I could see the league banning it *except* on goal-line plays, with the safety angle being “we’re reducing the number of plays where it can be used.”  The league wants scoring, but nobody wants to see that play over and over on 4th and 1 at midfield.  

It’s not exciting to watch a qb sneak td either.  I don’t see a carve out at the goal line.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matt_In_NH said:

Watching the chiefs game.  I really think the eagles are successful because all guys on offense are working together to push Hurts into the endZone while the defense has a bunch of individuals trying to make a play.   It seems like the defense should match power with power and defenders should push the DTs. No idea if it would work but why not try something different since literally nothing works to defend it.  

I haven’t really studied how teams defend the brotherly shove but the biggest issue is the Eagles can easily fake it or run other plays with the personnel they have on the field. They keep AJ Brown and Smith on the field. So the Eagles aren’t subbing in big people. If the defense subs in big people now you’re at a disadvantage.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does pay homage to football's rugby roots.

 

Looked to me like KC still had safeties and light-weight defenders backing their bigger DL players when they probably needed to have those guys backed up by a few other big bodies from the DL or from the OL to give them an equal push.

 

Of course you don't want to see players hurt, and there are some dangers to that play if a player gets caught the middle the wrong way, but it would be interesting to see how that counter strategy would pan out.

 

 

 

 

Edited by WideNine
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WideNine said:

It does pay homage to football's rugby roots.

 

Looked to me like KC still had safeties and light-weight defenders backing their bigger DL players when they probably needed to have those guys backed up by a few other big bodies from the DL or from the OL to give them an equal push.

 

Of course you don't want to see players hurt, but it would be different and entertaining to see how that counter strategy would pan out.

 

 

 

 

You can’t sub more bigger players because the Eagles keep their normal WRs out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

You can’t sub more bigger players because the Eagles keep their normal WRs out there.

 

Have to play man on the receivers. You are subbing LBs and/or S's who are just ramming into the pile from behind any ways.

 

The Eagles are bringing in two extra OL players, you are just matching.

 

Edited by WideNine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I don’t see a safety concern.  It’s probably one of the safest plays in football.  There’s no momentum.  You aren’t going to push on someone’s leg hard enough to break it.   That force requires a lot of speed.

 

that’s why injuries are way up in the NFl.  Everyone went to these spread offenses, the nfl pushed it thinking it would be safer than “3 yards and a cloud of dust”.  You used to have 300# guys standing still pushing each other, and now you have 225# guys running 25mph getting smacked by other 225# guys going 25 mph in the other direction. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...